I found the following very interesting.
"After three decades of quiescence in the arena of gun control politics, the turmoil of the 1960s unleashed a wave of demand for new gun control legislation. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas on November 22, 1963, prompted the country to focus on the regulation of firearms. Then the urban riots beginning in 1964 and the 1968 assassinations of Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. and Senator Robert F. Kennedy fueled an inferno of outrage that demanded congressional action. In the wake of these acts of violence the U.S. Congress enacted the Gun Control Act (P.L. 90-618, 82 Stat. 1213) which President Lyndon B. Johnson signed in 1968. Although the Gun Control Act did not contain the owner licensing and gun registration provisions that President Johnson desired, the act, along with the Safe Streets and Crime Control Act passed by Congress months earlier, contained the most significant restrictions on firearms since Congress enacted the National Firearms Act (NFA) in 1934."
The remainder of the article is here.
http://www.answers.com/topic/gun-control-act-of-1968" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I've never liked LBJ, not because of the Civil Rights legislation he supported and signed into law, but because of how I perceived his handling of the Vietnam War. I never knew he wanted owner licensing and registration of guns. It has been 40 years and the forces that be still want owner licensing and registration.
I know that a lot of gun owners feel that we should not compromise and many opponents feel the same way. The gun owners fear is that any leeway given erodes our right to keep and bear arms eventually leading to confiscation. As long as we have the Second Amendment, and the Heller ruling stating that ownership of guns is an individual right, I think we are safe with our guns. We are not safe from licensing and registration though. We still have to keep vigilant but not paranoid.
If history repeats itself, the continued mass killings we have seen recently will fuel the outrage once again and there may be a turn around of public opinion and the demand for congressional action. I wish I had an answer on how to stop this, but I don't.
Anyway, the article was good reading.
National Gun Registration - still at it after 40 years
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:06 am
- Location: Austin.TX
National Gun Registration - still at it after 40 years
The Republican Party has been taken over by the Four Horsemen of Calumny,
Fear, Ignorance, Bigotry and Smear.
Fear, Ignorance, Bigotry and Smear.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: National Gun Registration - still at it after 40 years
dont let a crisis go to waste
CHL class taken: 6/08/08
CHL application received in Austin: 6/12/08
Current Status: Processing Application
Application Completed - license issued or certificate active: 1/06/09
XD 9mm Service, XD 9mm Subcompact, AR15 16" Midlength, AK47
CHL application received in Austin: 6/12/08
Current Status: Processing Application
Application Completed - license issued or certificate active: 1/06/09
XD 9mm Service, XD 9mm Subcompact, AR15 16" Midlength, AK47
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 12329
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Angelina County
Re: National Gun Registration - still at it after 40 years
Agree on not liking Johnson for VietNaim
Also did not remember him wanting liscensing. That means he was worse than I thought & I dislike him more than I did.
Also did not remember him wanting liscensing. That means he was worse than I thought & I dislike him more than I did.


Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
- Location: Free Republic of Texas
Re: National Gun Registration - still at it after 40 years
>The gun owners fear is that any leeway given erodes our right to keep and bear arms eventually
>leading to confiscation.
Its not a fear, so much as its history in other countries. Its the divide and conquer approach. First register the machine guns, then the evil looking semi-auto guns, then confiscate the machine guns or at least add more restrictions, then restrict the semi-autos more, then ban the 'saturday night specials', then ban standard magazines by calling them 'high capacity' and declaring that no one needs them. Follow that with more onerous licensing requirements, then make owners re-register firearms that have already been registered, then.......
Basically, the above is what has happened in Canada.
>leading to confiscation.
Its not a fear, so much as its history in other countries. Its the divide and conquer approach. First register the machine guns, then the evil looking semi-auto guns, then confiscate the machine guns or at least add more restrictions, then restrict the semi-autos more, then ban the 'saturday night specials', then ban standard magazines by calling them 'high capacity' and declaring that no one needs them. Follow that with more onerous licensing requirements, then make owners re-register firearms that have already been registered, then.......
Basically, the above is what has happened in Canada.
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio Operator
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
- Location: Galveston
- Contact:
Re: National Gun Registration - still at it after 40 years
I believe we are the only country in in history that has actually reversed a disarmament momentum without an actual overthrow of the government. It seems once the trend is started the endpoint is eventual. It only proves just how resilient our form of government is and how effective the NRA can be once it is woken up.ghostrider wrote:>The gun owners fear is that any leeway given erodes our right to keep and bear arms eventually
>leading to confiscation.
Its not a fear, so much as its history in other countries. Its the divide and conquer approach. First register the machine guns, then the evil looking semi-auto guns, then confiscate the machine guns or at least add more restrictions, then restrict the semi-autos more, then ban the 'saturday night specials', then ban standard magazines by calling them 'high capacity' and declaring that no one needs them. Follow that with more onerous licensing requirements, then make owners re-register firearms that have already been registered, then.......
Basically, the above is what has happened in Canada.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
- Location: Free Republic of Texas
Re: National Gun Registration - still at it after 40 years
Actually, I believe the govt of Ireland just started returning handguns it had confiscated from the people over 30yrs ago, but that's a very unusual occurrence.
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio Operator