Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Topic author
ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#1

Post by ELB »

This seems to flying around the other gun boards, hadn't seen it land here yet... some excerpts below, definitely go RTWT

http://www.examiner.com/x-2782-DC-Gun-R ... rying-guns" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
On September 8, 2009, United States District Judge Bruce D. Black of the United States District Court for New Mexico entered summary judgment in a civil case for damages against Alamogordo, NM police officers.

...
...the police entered the movie theater, physically seized Mr. St. John from his seat, took him outside, disarmed him, searched him, obtained personally identifiable information from his wallet, and only allowed him to re-enter the theater after St. John agreed to secure his gun in his vehicle. Mr. St. John was never suspected of any crime nor issued a summons for violating any law.

...

On these facts, Judge Black concluded as a matter of law that the police violated Matthew St. John's constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment because they seized and disarmed him even though there was not "any reason to believe that a crime was afoot."

...

Notably, Judge Black denied the police officers' requested "qualified immunity," a judicially created doctrine allowing government officials acting in good faith to avoid liability for violating the law where the law was not "clearly established." In this case, Judge Black concluded that:

[see article for what the judge said. ;-) ]
USAF 1982-2005
____________
User avatar

AEA
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#2

Post by AEA »

Cool!........

Too bad we can't send this Judge to the Supreme Court!
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#3

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

This is a great and correct decision. Detaining someone for that which is not illegal is a clear §1983 violation. I hope it's upheld at the appellate level.

Chas.

DONT TREAD ON ME

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#4

Post by DONT TREAD ON ME »

This is great. Too bad more judges cant be like this.

Sent an e-mail to the lawyer thanking him for standing up for the 2A!

:patriot:
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#5

Post by joe817 »

Thanks ELB for posting a great news article! :tiphat:
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
User avatar

pdubyoo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 381
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:23 am
Location: Spring, TX

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#6

Post by pdubyoo »

AEA wrote:Cool!........

Too bad we can't send this Judge to the Supreme Court!
Can you imagine the angry astroturf mobs with swastikas?? :shock:
Nov. 2010...Check!
Nov. 2012...Don't Give Up!
Jan. 2013...True Change!
User avatar

lonewolf
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1064
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:40 pm
Location: Euless

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#7

Post by lonewolf »

It's very nice to hear that there is a judge somewhere that has some common sense. It's unfortunate that so many of our laws have been subject to "interpretation" over the years. There is always someone, somewhere legislating from the bench.
User avatar

Seburiel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 300
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:05 am
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#8

Post by Seburiel »

Not to be dense (though, at times, I am) What does this mean for Texans?
Obviously we can't OC handguns here at the present time, but what about longarm carry? Will this mean that we shouldn't worry about the 'investigative stop' scenario here?
just curious.
User avatar

mgood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 964
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:07 am
Location: Snyder, Texas
Contact:

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#9

Post by mgood »

Yes, open carry is perfectly legal in New Mexico. But it is still unusual enough that a lot of people there don't even know it's legal and it still raises eyebrows at times.
I worked at a gun shop in New Mexico where we were encouraged to open carry. Frequently, while going to lunch or to or from work, I open carried into other businesses. Never got harassed or anything though some people would ask if I was a cop or ask me about the legality of carrying.

My boss, the owner of the gun shop, frequently explained to people that while open carry is legal, any business has a right to refuse service to anyone as long as they don't discriminate against race, sex, religion, national origin, or sexual preference. He said that if he goes into a store and the manager says, "Sir, would you mind not bringing that in here? It makes my other customers nervous." No problem. He would go out and lock it in his vehicle and then he'd be free to come back in.

From that article, it looks like the theater people never said anything to Mr. St. John. They just saw a "man with a gun" and called the police.
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 13568
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#10

Post by C-dub »

Seburiel wrote:Not to be dense (though, at times, I am) What does this mean for Texans?
Obviously we can't OC handguns here at the present time, but what about longarm carry? Will this mean that we shouldn't worry about the 'investigative stop' scenario here?
just curious.
I don't know that it means anything for us in Texas. It does, however, mean that when visiting any of the other states that we would be allowed to openly carry we can be just a little more assured that we won't have our rights violated.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider

wheelgun1958
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1129
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:40 pm
Location: Flo, TX

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#11

Post by wheelgun1958 »

mgood wrote:He said that if he goes into a store and the manager says, "Sir, would you mind not bringing that in here? It makes my other customers nervous." No problem. He would go out and lock it in his vehicle and then he'd be free to come back in.
A better answer would be "Fine, I'll take my business elsewhere."

:thumbs2:
User avatar

mgood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 964
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:07 am
Location: Snyder, Texas
Contact:

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#12

Post by mgood »

wheelgun1958 wrote:
mgood wrote:He said that if he goes into a store and the manager says, "Sir, would you mind not bringing that in here? It makes my other customers nervous." No problem. He would go out and lock it in his vehicle and then he'd be free to come back in.
A better answer would be "Fine, I'll take my business elsewhere."

:thumbs2:
I agree, and I don't think he shopped at many places that wouldn't allow him to carry. But that was just his spiel when explaining the law to customers of his. This man firmly believes you should be able to purchase hand grenades at drive-through windows. The people here would like him.
:patriot:
Last edited by mgood on Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Jeremae
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 595
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Highlands,Tejas

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#13

Post by Jeremae »

As a cartoon once said (dogbert I think)

I long to buy booze, cigarettes and ammunition from the same drive thru and use it all up before I get home.

:thumbs2:
Reasonable gun control is hitting your target with the first shot.
User avatar

GaryAdrian
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:19 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#14

Post by GaryAdrian »

Jeremae wrote:As a cartoon once said (dogbert I think)

I long to buy booze, cigarettes and ammunition from the same drive thru and use it all up before I get home.

:thumbs2:
Then you need to live in Uvalde, Texas. There they have an ATF store. It sells Liquor , Guns and the best Cigars in the county! :patriot: :txflag:

This is not my picture but I have been to this place. http://www.pbase.com/dgaar/image/104620387
The brick side is the liquor store and the tan connecting bld. is the gun store.
ONLY in TEXAS! :txflag: :fire :cheers2:
NRA Life Member
Texas State Rifle Association
NRA-Certified Firearms Instructor
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18502
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for OC

#15

Post by Keith B »

GaryAdrian wrote:
Jeremae wrote:As a cartoon once said (dogbert I think)

I long to buy booze, cigarettes and ammunition from the same drive thru and use it all up before I get home.

:thumbs2:
Then you need to live in Uvalde, Texas. There they have an ATF store. It sells Liquor , Guns and the best Cigars in the county! :patriot: :txflag:

This is not my picture but I have been to this place. http://www.pbase.com/dgaar/image/104620387
The brick side is the liquor store and the tan connecting bld. is the gun store.
ONLY in TEXAS! :txflag: :fire :cheers2:
Combination package liquor and sporting goods stores are actually an old concept. Growing up as a kid in Missouri I know of at least 5 or 6 of them in my small hometown alone. It is only in the last 15 - 20 years that they have become seperated. However, a couple of them still exist and do a good business in all arenas. ;-)
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”