TexasCHLforum.com

http://www.news4jax.com/news/-mental-he ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This is not a positive step foward. I have military friends who I know have PTSD from multiple tours but refuse to get help because they don't want their 2A rights taken away. If this is signed by the governor I guarantee it will lead to more mass shootings and not less in Florida.

There is apparently a huge problem in Florida that needs to be addressed. We all know that most of the massacres that have happened have been with "unstable mentally ill people". We always hear AFTER the massacre, how unstable the individual was and he was a danger. I am all for protecting the rights of everyone under the 2nd Amendment but there are those who circumvent the law and, I believe, this law will close that loophole. It will stop those who use the system as a get out of "jail" free card.

If you chose to "voluntarily" commit yourself instead of facing the legal system, then you should have to answer for your actions. Once you are deemed "safe", you can petition the Court to get your weapons back. There are safeguards in this bill. You cannot lose your rights due to counseling or other therapy.

Either we police ourselves or the Government WILL! The NRA and Florida gun clubs worked hand in hand on this bill. THE NRA has ALWAYS advocated for mental health provisions and to a certain extent, I agree.



From the NRA -

"June 19, 2013.

TO:

USF & NRA Member and Friends.

FROM:

Marion P. Hammer

USF Executive Director.

NRA Past President.

False information is being circulated about House Bill 1355 by people who do not have a clue what the bill actually does or why it is needed. Many gun owners are being deceived by reckless people who are sending out e-mail blasts attacking the bill as being anti-Second Amendment. Unfortunately, some well-meaning folks have asked the Governor to veto HB-1355 based on misinformation. The Governor needs to sign HB-1355.

The truth is HB-1355 is very limited. It does NOT cover people who voluntarily go to private counseling for help. It does NOT cover people who voluntarily go to a doctor for help. It does NOT cover people who voluntarily go to a public clinic for help.

It ONLY applies to people with mental illnesses who are already in a mental health facility under a Baker Act petition AND who have subsequently been diagnosed as being an imminent danger to self or others.

The bill has two triggers: the Baker Act commitment and the diagnosis of being an imminent danger to self or others. The bill has no effect on anyone else.

Currently, people being held in a mental health facility under a Baker Act Commitment and who are subsequently determined to be a danger to themselves or others, may voluntarily agree to be committed for treatment to avoid going to court.

If they don’t voluntarily agree to treatment, a petition is then filed for a court hearing for involuntary commitment. When a court orders a commitment, the person's name is entered into the National Instant Check System (NICS) database of people who are prohibited from purchasing firearms. If they voluntarily agree to commitment their names are NOT entered in to the database.

The problem is that some of these dangerous people with mental illnesses, who are known to be a danger to self or others, immediately revoke their voluntary agreement as soon as they reach the treatment facility. They must then be released within 24 hours. They do it repeatedly. The system has become like a revolving door and is failing. People with mental illnesses, who are KNOWN to be a danger to self or others, are not being stopped from purchasing firearms.

Under HB-1355, people in this category may still agree to voluntary commitment for treatment, but they would be informed (and must sign a statement acknowledging that they have been informed) that because they are deemed to be dangerous, their names will be entered into the NICS database until they have had treatment and are no longer considered a danger to themselves or others and may apply to have their names removed from the database. The process for removing a name from the database is exactly the same as already prescribed in law for those who have been involuntarily committed for treatment.

If the person disagrees or feels strongly about not giving up his gun rights, the person can refuse voluntary commitment and a petition for involuntary commitment would move ahead through the full court process, in which the person has the opportunity to fight it in court.

When the NRA was asked by the Judge who chairs the Florida Supreme Court Task Force on Mental Illness (Judge Steve Leifman) and by Representative Barbara Watson to help solve the problem of constructing language to give the maximum protection to the rights of dangerous people with mental illnesses, we agreed to try.

The NRA worked with the Judge, bill sponsors, Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and legislative staff in the House and Senate to protect gun rights as well as find a way to help keep dangerous people with mental illnesses from being able to purchase firearms. That's what this bill does.

Right now, the head of an organization based in Colorado, who has not been involved in the legislative process here in Florida, who has not worked with the Judges or bill sponsors, or FDLE or the FBI, who has not been in Florida for committee hearings or meeting with legislators and who appears to be deliberately misrepresenting the effect of the bill and existing law – has been sending out erroneous, inflammatory information in the form of e-mail blasts encouraging people to ask the Governor to veto this bill.

They are essentially telling the Governor and gun owners all over the country that they think it's OK for dangerous people with mental illness to be able to purchase guns. That is irresponsible. Unfortunately, some folks have taken those false e-mails at face value, and asked the Governor to veto the bill based on erroneous information.

The NRA and Unified Sportsmen of Florida support the bill. We worked hard to protect the rights of the mentally ill as well as the rights of those who might fall victim to dangerous people with mental illnesses. All too often the perpetrators of mass tragedies who used guns were known to have mental illness, but nobody did anything. We believe that lives can be saved by keeping dangerous people with mental illnesses from being able to purchase guns.

Please e-mail Governor Scott right away and urge him to sign HB-1355.

IN THE SUBJECT LINE PUT: PLEASE SIGN HB-1355.
rick.scott@eog.myflorida.com

PLEASE E-MAIL GOVERNOR SCOTT TODAY."

^^^^ Thanks for posting that.

We can only hope that the best intentions of the NRA are not perverted by the anti-gun Liberals in FL. Any State that elects Debbie WS has way too many Liberals to be safe with the most iron clad agreements. I'm reminded of the activity in CA relative to mental health and hope that this law does prevent such activity.

Governments continually prove to me that once a "list" is created, it is very hard to get off of it.

chasfm11 wrote:We can only hope that the best intentions of the NRA are not perverted by the anti-gun Liberals in FL. Any State that elects Debbie WS has way too many Liberals to be safe with the most iron clad agreements. I'm reminded of the activity in CA relative to mental health and hope that this law does prevent such activity.

Governments continually prove to me that once a "list" is created, it is very hard to get off of it.

I think that's the same fear that drive soldiers from seeking help. The mental health professionals of Florida are pushing against the bill for the same reasons.

Cprems points are great and I don't disagree with them. I fear that without strong, clear language and safeguards, people will fear they are irrevocably surrendering their 2A rights if they seek treatment.

Great discussion though.

Im just some guy on the internet........ But a Bill like that WILL further stigmatize mental health care and WILL cause more of those in need to not seek help.
And no, Im not guessing.

From what has been written about this bill from the co-authors (NRA etc) this bill will provide protections against that. The only way I can see it affecting those who fail to seek help, is that they have something to hide and know they are a danger and they will be added to NCIC.

If you (generalized) need help, seek it. Don't let the rest of us take the fall for your actions. It's all about being a responsible gun owner. Knowing when you need help and NOT getting it, will lead to us having NOTHING left to shoot.

Be reasonable and stop thinking about yourself (generalized) It's this line of thinking that gets us labeled as "gun nuts"!

cprems wrote:From what has been written about this bill from the co-authors (NRA etc) this bill will provide protections against that. The only way I can see it affecting those who fail to seek help, is that they have something to hide and know they are a danger and they will be added to NCIC.

If you (generalized) need help, seek it. Don't let the rest of us take the fall for your actions. It's all about being a responsible gun owner. Knowing when you need help and NOT getting it, will lead to us having NOTHING left to shoot.

Be reasonable and stop thinking about yourself (generalized) It's this line of thinking that gets us labeled as "gun nuts"!

I understand what you are saying. But I'm a pragmatic guy so I have a couple of questions.

1. Exactly what problem are we solving? More specifically, which of incidents in the past 5 years would have been prevented if this law had been in place and what percentage of the overall incidents were those preventions?
2. What does the risk analysis say about the potential for "exceptions" and what safeguards have been put into place to prevent those?

The simple fact is that the "rest of us" will ALWAYS take the fall for the actions in every single gun related incident. That is the way this works. Liberals believe in 100% prevention (i.e. "if is saves the life of just one child, it is worth it.") A FL Liberal one told me that she would shut down every coal mine in the country to save just one person with breathing problems, whether those breathing problems could be directly attributed to the coal mines or not.

I do not want to see guns in the hands of the mentally ill. Having watched the mental illness industry in action much closer than I wanted to, I have zero confidence in anything good coming out of it. If we really want to fix the problem, we need to fix the underlying problems with mental health care. That isn't even on anyone's radar.

chasfm11 wrote:

cprems wrote:From what has been written about this bill from the co-authors (NRA etc) this bill will provide protections against that. The only way I can see it affecting those who fail to seek help, is that they have something to hide and know they are a danger and they will be added to NCIC.

If you (generalized) need help, seek it. Don't let the rest of us take the fall for your actions. It's all about being a responsible gun owner. Knowing when you need help and NOT getting it, will lead to us having NOTHING left to shoot.

Be reasonable and stop thinking about yourself (generalized) It's this line of thinking that gets us labeled as "gun nuts"!

I understand what you are saying. But I'm a pragmatic guy so I have a couple of questions.

1. Exactly what problem are we solving? More specifically, which of incidents in the past 5 years would have been prevented if this law had been in place and what percentage of the overall incidents were those preventions?
2. What does the risk analysis say about the potential for "exceptions" and what safeguards have been put into place to prevent those?

The simple fact is that the "rest of us" will ALWAYS take the fall for the actions in every single gun related incident. That is the way this works. Liberals believe in 100% prevention (i.e. "if is saves the life of just one child, it is worth it.") A FL Liberal one told me that she would shut down every coal mine in the country to save just one person with breathing problems, whether those breathing problems could be directly attributed to the coal mines or not.

I do not want to see guns in the hands of the mentally ill. Having watched the mental illness industry in action much closer than I wanted to, I have zero confidence in anything good coming out of it. If we really want to fix the problem, we need to fix the underlying problems with mental health care. That isn't even on anyone's radar.

As I see it, the problem they are solving is in regards to those who use the "voluntary" commitment as a revolving door to escape criminal behavior. I believe this would have solved the VA shooting, Colorado movie theater shooting and I possibly the Sandy hook school schooling. Why, you ask? Because they could have been reported and action taken. Look at the school shooting. His mother tried to get him committed but could not under their current laws. Taking him out of the equation could have prevented this tragedy.

I believe that "mental illness" needs to be CLEARLY defined and on a CASE BY CASE basis. No roping those who suffer from PTSD for example in one category. Even patients who are medicated for Bi-Polar disorders should be evaluated as an individual. I know several people who are medically compliant but cannot own a firearm due to the grouping into a "category".

Safeguarding an individuals right is paramount. The medical Mental illness needs to be completely revamped. The problem is, is that it is a massive money maker. The more medications dispensed, the more money these companies with the "mental health" agenda will push to come up with new "disorders". In the last 20 years we've seen new "disorders" almost triple. We've taken God out of school and taken discipline away from the parents. Until we get a do-over, we are stuck and have to work within the parameters that are set by those whose pockets are greased.

We need to do a better job of report mentally unstable people (posing a danger to themselves or others), then and only then, can we get a handle on this issue. Once their crisis has passed, they can get re-evaluated.

Now we can get into the realm of who rights trump whose. Where do their rights end and ours begin? Who is to decide it? While I do not trust either the Government in its current form, I also do not (to a much lesser extent) trust the medical community. They all have their agendas. Now, add political left leanings and anti gun hysteria into the mix and we have what we have, now!

cprems wrote:

chasfm11 wrote:

cprems wrote:From what has been written about this bill from the co-authors (NRA etc) this bill will provide protections against that. The only way I can see it affecting those who fail to seek help, is that they have something to hide and know they are a danger and they will be added to NCIC.

If you (generalized) need help, seek it. Don't let the rest of us take the fall for your actions. It's all about being a responsible gun owner. Knowing when you need help and NOT getting it, will lead to us having NOTHING left to shoot.

Be reasonable and stop thinking about yourself (generalized) It's this line of thinking that gets us labeled as "gun nuts"!

I understand what you are saying. But I'm a pragmatic guy so I have a couple of questions.

1. Exactly what problem are we solving? More specifically, which of incidents in the past 5 years would have been prevented if this law had been in place and what percentage of the overall incidents were those preventions?
2. What does the risk analysis say about the potential for "exceptions" and what safeguards have been put into place to prevent those?

The simple fact is that the "rest of us" will ALWAYS take the fall for the actions in every single gun related incident. That is the way this works. Liberals believe in 100% prevention (i.e. "if is saves the life of just one child, it is worth it.") A FL Liberal one told me that she would shut down every coal mine in the country to save just one person with breathing problems, whether those breathing problems could be directly attributed to the coal mines or not.

I do not want to see guns in the hands of the mentally ill. Having watched the mental illness industry in action much closer than I wanted to, I have zero confidence in anything good coming out of it. If we really want to fix the problem, we need to fix the underlying problems with mental health care. That isn't even on anyone's radar.

As I see it, the problem they are solving is in regards to those who use the "voluntary" commitment as a revolving door to escape criminal behavior. I believe this would have solved the VA shooting, Colorado movie theater shooting and I possibly the Sandy hook school schooling. Why, you ask? Because they could have been reported and action taken. Look at the school shooting. His mother tried to get him committed but could not under their current laws. Taking him out of the equation could have prevented this tragedy.

I believe that "mental illness" needs to be CLEARLY defined and on a CASE BY CASE basis. No roping those who suffer from PTSD for example in one category. Even patients who are medicated for Bi-Polar disorders should be evaluated as an individual. I know several people who are medically compliant but cannot own a firearm due to the grouping into a "category".

Safeguarding an individuals right is paramount. The medical Mental illness needs to be completely revamped. The problem is, is that it is a massive money maker. The more medications dispensed, the more money these companies with the "mental health" agenda will push to come up with new "disorders". In the last 20 years we've seen new "disorders" almost triple. We've taken God out of school and taken discipline away from the parents. Until we get a do-over, we are stuck and have to work within the parameters that are set by those whose pockets are greased.

We need to do a better job of report mentally unstable people (posing a danger to themselves or others), then and only then, can we get a handle on this issue. Once their crisis has passed, they can get re-evaluated.

Now we can get into the realm of who rights trump whose. Where do their rights end and ours begin? Who is to decide it? While I do not trust either the Government in its current form, I also do not (to a much lesser extent) trust the medical community. They all have their agendas. Now, add political left leanings and anti gun hysteria into the mix and we have what we have, now!

That is where I thought that you were heading. I'm a project manager by trade. We used to put together critical paths on projects and use a "ATAMO" block. It stands for "and then a miracle occurs" We did it to demonstrate that a project was set up so that only a miracle would allow it to finish on time and within budget.

You are absolutely right about needing to do a better job of reporting mentally unstable people but that part of the flow chart needs an ATAMO block. In fact, every one of the examples you gave (and I'll add Lochner to your list) is an example the specific failure of the system to which we will be turning for resolution.

This comes down to the reality of making it work versus the possibility that it could work. Of the latter, I have no doubt. It could work. But I'm looking for just one example where it did work. I have yet to find one.

Someone we know was treated multiple times for mental difficulties. It turned out to be a serotonin imbalance and has been corrected with medication. The difficulty with SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) is that they all come with side effects, mild to to severe depending on the individual. While the serotonin condition being treated can be stable, the side effects often persuade an individual taking the drugs to go off of them. I have no experience with those with bipolar disorder but I'm told the side effects from the drug combinations used to treat that condition produce even worse side effects and that it is a constant struggle to keep those who need to be taking the drugs doing so. And these are all the milder forms of some of these conditions that do not require long term institutional care.

One last point. If you believe the stories, there are 30M people without healthcare coverage. Among those, only the most severe are treated for their mental problems, usually because they draw the attention of the police and are driven to a community hospital like John Peter Smith for an "evaluation." Our daughter is a police dispatcher and she deals with a group of people who go through this cycle repeatedly There is no impetus to help help them today. They receive their evaluation and are turned back into society. Until something different happens, I remain unconvinced that what you suggest needs to happen will happen. There are a number of ATAMO blocks in the process.

It IS a slippery slope if the safeguards are not implemented. It will also, I believe, strengthen the law and get those who are in real need of help, the help they need.

I understand what you say in regards to the evaluations in Texas. We have a revolving door and no way of treating them. If you have insurance, they'll use up all of your coverage and then throw you out. I have seen this first hand when I worked the ER. We'd have people come in who were in desperate need of help and got the "evaluation" and then were kicked out after 72 hours. They were given a weeks worth of medication with no follow up. The system is broken and mental illness is treated like leprosy. Until the attitude towards mental illness is welcomed in social circles and seen as an issue that we NEED to fix, then nothing permanent will be done. Those who have mental illnesses are shunned by society.

Some medications that are currently available in Europe cannot be used in the USA. We can thank the over regulation of the USDA for that. My point being is that those medications have fewer side effects and are relatively cheap. I have no doubt the big pharmaceutical companies are behind it. Cheaper drugs that work = less profit for them.

Nexium is one such drug. I know its not a drug used to treat mental illness but it's available in Canada and Europe in generic form and costs about 10 cents a pill.

I agree with what you have stated. The system is broken. It cannot be fixed without being completely revamped. Get rid of these stupid "disorders" and let the parents actually parent and discipline the little darlings.

When I grew up, I knew that if I messed up, 1. My parents were going to find out about it. 2. That I was in serious trouble and was probably going to get disciplined. The feeling and fear of letting my parents down was worse than any discipline that I eventually got. I do NOT advocate in beating children - far from it. But a good spanking never hurt any kid.

The system IS broken. We need State hospitals brought back. We need to make sure that those who need the help are actually helped and not tossed out with a fistful of medications and no follow up. MHMR needs to better funded.

"Hammer said after a person with mental illness is treated, they’ll be able to petition the court to get their gun rights back.

“They will not be able to purchase a gun until they have been treated, and a psychiatrist says they need relief from disability,” said Hammer."

The problem here is that there is no adjudication. This effectively strips a person of their rights without due process. Having a system to 'petition' the state to get back something they should have never had stripped is the antithesis of liberty.

Surely, nobody wants dangerous individuals to commit acts of violence against others; but at what cost of liberty are we willing to do it? If it means we are no longer free, then I'll certainly pass on the government's false sense of security.

Here are just a few of the listed mental disorders from Wikipedia. A voluntary committal for treatment of any of these could strip away the person's 2A rights.
1. Acute stress reaction (also called acute stress disorder, psychological shock, mental shock, or simply shock) is a psychological condition arising in response to a terrifying or traumatic event.
2. Adjustment disorder occurs when an individual is unable to adjust to or cope with a particular stressor, like a major life event. Since people with this disorder normally have symptoms that depressed people do, such as general loss of interest, feelings of hopelessness and crying, this disorder is also sometimes known as situational depression.
3. Anorexia nervosa is an eating disorder characterized by immoderate food restriction and irrational fear of gaining weight, as well as a distorted body self-perception.
4. Bereavement (also called Grief) is a multi-faceted response to loss, particularly to the loss of someone or something to which a bond was formed.
5. Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common eating disorder in the United States affecting 3.5% of females and 2% of males and is prevalent in up to 30% of those seeking weight loss treatment.
6. Bulimia nervosa is an eating disorder characterized by binge eating and purging, or consuming a large amount of food in a short amount of time followed by an attempt to rid oneself of the food consumed (purging), typically by vomiting, taking a laxative or diuretic, and/or excessive exercise, because of an extensive concern for body weight.
7. Caffeine-induced sleep disorder is a psychiatric disorder that results from overconsumption of the stimulant caffeine. "When caffeine is consumed immediately before bedtime or continuously throughout the day, sleep onset may be delayed, total sleep time reduced, normal stages of sleep altered, and the quality of sleep decreased.
8. Childhood amnesia (also called infantile amnesia) is the inability of adults to retrieve episodic memories before the age of 2–4 years, as well as the period before age 10 of which adults retain fewer memories than might otherwise be expected given the passage of time.
9. Dyslexia is characterized by difficulty in learning to read fluently and with inaccurate comprehension despite normal intelligence.[1][2] This includes difficulty with phonological awareness, phonological decoding, processing speed, orthographic coding, auditory short-term memory, language skills/verbal comprehension, and/or rapid naming.
10. Nocturnal enuresis or nighttime urinary incontinence, commonly called bedwetting, or "'sleepwetting'" is involuntary urination while asleep after the age at which bladder control usually occurs.
11. Insomnia, or sleeplessness, is a sleep disorder in which there is an inability to fall asleep or to stay asleep as long as desired.
12. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is sexual dysfunction characterized by the inability to develop or maintain an erection of the penis during sexual performance.[
13. Dyscalculia is difficulty in learning or comprehending arithmetic, such as difficulty in understanding numbers, learning how to manipulate numbers, and learning math facts. It is generally seen as a specific developmental disorder like dyslexia.
14. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, similar to hyperkinetic disorder in the ICD) is a psychiatric disorder[1] or neurobehavioral disorder[2] characterized by significant difficulties either of inattention or hyperactivity and impulsiveness or a combination of the two.
15. Nicotine withdrawal is the group of symptoms that occur upon the abrupt discontinuation or decrease in intake of nicotine.
16. Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is an anxiety disorder characterized by intrusive thoughts that produce uneasiness, apprehension, fear, or worry; by repetitive behaviors aimed at reducing the associated anxiety; or by a combination of such obsessions and compulsions.
17. A phobia is, when used in the context of clinical psychology, a type of anxiety disorder, usually defined as a persistent fear of an object or situation in which the sufferer commits to great lengths in avoiding, typically disproportional to the actual danger posed, often being recognized as irrational. In the event the phobia cannot be avoided entirely, the sufferer will endure the situation or object with marked distress and significant interference in social or occupational activities.
18. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a severe condition that may develop after a person is exposed to one or more traumatic events, such as sexual assault, serious injury or the threat of death.
19. Sleepwalking, also known as somnambulism or noctambulism, is a sleep disorder belonging to the parasomnia family.[2] Sleepwalkers arise from the slow wave sleep stage in a state of low consciousness and perform activities that are usually performed during a state of full consciousness.
20. Stuttering , also known as stammering, is a speech disorder in which the flow of speech is disrupted by involuntary repetitions and prolongations of sounds, syllables, words or phrases as well as involuntary silent pauses or blocks in which the person who stutters is unable to produce sounds.

So, just to be clear... seek help for any of the above in Florida, and lose your rights.

lbuehler325 wrote:"Hammer said after a person with mental illness is treated, they’ll be able to petition the court to get their gun rights back.

“They will not be able to purchase a gun until they have been treated, and a psychiatrist says they need relief from disability,” said Hammer."

The problem here is that there is no adjudication. This effectively strips a person of their rights without due process. Having a system to 'petition' the state to get back something they should have never had stripped is the antithesis of liberty.

Surely, nobody wants dangerous individuals to commit acts of violence against others; but at what cost of liberty are we willing to do it? If it means we are no longer free, then I'll certainly pass on the government's false sense of security.

Here are just a few of the listed mental disorders from Wikipedia. A voluntary committal for treatment of any of these could strip away the person's 2A rights.
1. Acute stress reaction (also called acute stress disorder, psychological shock, mental shock, or simply shock) is a psychological condition arising in response to a terrifying or traumatic event.
2. Adjustment disorder occurs when an individual is unable to adjust to or cope with a particular stressor, like a major life event. Since people with this disorder normally have symptoms that depressed people do, such as general loss of interest, feelings of hopelessness and crying, this disorder is also sometimes known as situational depression.
3. Anorexia nervosa is an eating disorder characterized by immoderate food restriction and irrational fear of gaining weight, as well as a distorted body self-perception.
4. Bereavement (also called Grief) is a multi-faceted response to loss, particularly to the loss of someone or something to which a bond was formed.
5. Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common eating disorder in the United States affecting 3.5% of females and 2% of males and is prevalent in up to 30% of those seeking weight loss treatment.
6. Bulimia nervosa is an eating disorder characterized by binge eating and purging, or consuming a large amount of food in a short amount of time followed by an attempt to rid oneself of the food consumed (purging), typically by vomiting, taking a laxative or diuretic, and/or excessive exercise, because of an extensive concern for body weight.
7. Caffeine-induced sleep disorder is a psychiatric disorder that results from overconsumption of the stimulant caffeine. "When caffeine is consumed immediately before bedtime or continuously throughout the day, sleep onset may be delayed, total sleep time reduced, normal stages of sleep altered, and the quality of sleep decreased.
8. Childhood amnesia (also called infantile amnesia) is the inability of adults to retrieve episodic memories before the age of 2–4 years, as well as the period before age 10 of which adults retain fewer memories than might otherwise be expected given the passage of time.
9. Dyslexia is characterized by difficulty in learning to read fluently and with inaccurate comprehension despite normal intelligence.[1][2] This includes difficulty with phonological awareness, phonological decoding, processing speed, orthographic coding, auditory short-term memory, language skills/verbal comprehension, and/or rapid naming.
10. Nocturnal enuresis or nighttime urinary incontinence, commonly called bedwetting, or "'sleepwetting'" is involuntary urination while asleep after the age at which bladder control usually occurs.
11. Insomnia, or sleeplessness, is a sleep disorder in which there is an inability to fall asleep or to stay asleep as long as desired.
12. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is sexual dysfunction characterized by the inability to develop or maintain an erection of the penis during sexual performance.[
13. Dyscalculia is difficulty in learning or comprehending arithmetic, such as difficulty in understanding numbers, learning how to manipulate numbers, and learning math facts. It is generally seen as a specific developmental disorder like dyslexia.
14. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, similar to hyperkinetic disorder in the ICD) is a psychiatric disorder[1] or neurobehavioral disorder[2] characterized by significant difficulties either of inattention or hyperactivity and impulsiveness or a combination of the two.
15. Nicotine withdrawal is the group of symptoms that occur upon the abrupt discontinuation or decrease in intake of nicotine.
16. Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is an anxiety disorder characterized by intrusive thoughts that produce uneasiness, apprehension, fear, or worry; by repetitive behaviors aimed at reducing the associated anxiety; or by a combination of such obsessions and compulsions.
17. A phobia is, when used in the context of clinical psychology, a type of anxiety disorder, usually defined as a persistent fear of an object or situation in which the sufferer commits to great lengths in avoiding, typically disproportional to the actual danger posed, often being recognized as irrational. In the event the phobia cannot be avoided entirely, the sufferer will endure the situation or object with marked distress and significant interference in social or occupational activities.
18. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a severe condition that may develop after a person is exposed to one or more traumatic events, such as sexual assault, serious injury or the threat of death.
19. Sleepwalking, also known as somnambulism or noctambulism, is a sleep disorder belonging to the parasomnia family.[2] Sleepwalkers arise from the slow wave sleep stage in a state of low consciousness and perform activities that are usually performed during a state of full consciousness.
20. Stuttering , also known as stammering, is a speech disorder in which the flow of speech is disrupted by involuntary repetitions and prolongations of sounds, syllables, words or phrases as well as involuntary silent pauses or blocks in which the person who stutters is unable to produce sounds.

So, just to clear... seek help for any of the above in Florida, and lose your rights.

The problem is clear - this is a laundry list designed to ensare a large segment of the people and to be used to strip them of gun ownership. What do urinary problems or ED have to do with mental competence to own a gun?

What do urinary problems or ED have to do with mental competence to own a gun?

I have a response (joke) to that, but I don't want to get kicked off the forum!
Seriously though, NOTHING! And that's the problem with lumping everything into one group, "mental health issues".