WFAA gun discussions this week

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

TexasJohnBoy
Banned
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: WFAA gun discussions this week

#91

Post by TexasJohnBoy »

They used the Aurora shooter as their example for requiring background checks for body armor. The shooter that passed background checks.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: WFAA gun discussions this week

#92

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

VMI77 wrote:
RPBrown wrote:Most of the body armor they were talking about was Class 4. I don't have an issue with someone obtaining class 4 armor but that stuff is heavy and bulky. If I were to own any, it would be a class 2 or 3 I think.
None of it is pleasant to wear in Texas heat.
You're not kidding! They why so many of us said we'd rather die quickly from a bullet than slowly cook to death.

Chas.
User avatar

fickman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 1711
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:52 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: WFAA gun discussions this week

#93

Post by fickman »

From last night. . . after detailing that the law prevents BATFE from maintaining a database to reconcile gun serial numbers to purchasers and detailing that they have to go to the manufacturer, then to the wholeseller, then to the distributor, then to the FFL / storefront, then to the original purchaser in order to determine ownership. . .

BATFE Agent: Last year we did over 300,000 serial number lookups for criminal investigations.
Reporter: And you had to do all of those manually?
BATFE Agent: Yes
Me (from couch): You're darn right!

. . . I couldn't even muster a crocodile tear.
Native Texian
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: WFAA gun discussions this week

#94

Post by VMI77 »

fickman wrote:From last night. . . after detailing that the law prevents BATFE from maintaining a database to reconcile gun serial numbers to purchasers and detailing that they have to go to the manufacturer, then to the wholeseller, then to the distributor, then to the FFL / storefront, then to the original purchaser in order to determine ownership. . .

BATFE Agent: Last year we did over 300,000 serial number lookups for criminal investigations.
Reporter: And you had to do all of those manually?
BATFE Agent: Yes
Me (from couch): You're darn right!

. . . I couldn't even muster a crocodile tear.
And what they're not telling you is how many paid off....I suspect not many.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 9044
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: WFAA gun discussions this week

#95

Post by mojo84 »

And some thought negative of me for indicating I detected a bit of agenda. :smilelol5:
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Pawpaw
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
Location: Hunt County

Re: WFAA gun discussions this week

#96

Post by Pawpaw »

Relax mojo... That's not the reason we think negative of you. ;-) "rlol"

I still feel the first two episodes were remarkably balanced. Much better than the similar attempt a while back where the BG made it a point to shoot the GG first, every time.

I suppose it was just too much to hope that an ABC affiliate would maintain that balanced approach.

FWIW, You can see all of the episodes here: http://www.wfaa.com/search/Ready.%20Aim.%20Truth/
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams

rentz
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 9:16 am
Location: DFW

Re: WFAA gun discussions this week

#97

Post by rentz »

Pawpaw wrote:Relax mojo... That's not the reason we think negative of you. ;-) "rlol"

I still feel the first two episodes were remarkably balanced. Much better than the similar attempt a while back where the BG made it a point to shoot the GG first, every time.

I suppose it was just too much to hope that an ABC affiliate would maintain that balanced approach.

FWIW, You can see all of the episodes here: http://www.wfaa.com/search/Ready.%20Aim.%20Truth/

to be fair i think much of the slant of the story is due to the reporter covering the section, brett shipp is a good reporter and his two segments appeared very balanced....then they went on to different reporters that seemed to twist it a little more

rentz
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 9:16 am
Location: DFW

Re: WFAA gun discussions this week

#98

Post by rentz »

it would be more balanced if when the reporter discussed short barrel and full auto that they mention the length someone has to go through to get one and that the batfe has all their information PLUS a tax on the item.
You cant just walk out and buy a "machine gun" its very expensive and its registered.
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 9044
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: WFAA gun discussions this week

#99

Post by mojo84 »

Pawpaw wrote:Relax mojo... That's not the reason we think negative of you. ;-) "rlol"

I still feel the first two episodes were remarkably balanced. Much better than the similar attempt a while back where the BG made it a point to shoot the GG first, every time.

I suppose it was just too much to hope that an ABC affiliate would maintain that balanced approach.

FWIW, You can see all of the episodes here: http://www.wfaa.com/search/Ready.%20Aim.%20Truth/
Ouch! My sensitivities are injured. :)

I agree about the first two episodes. It sounds like it took a deep dive on the third one. I haven't seen it yet. Will use your link and check them out.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

TexasJohnBoy
Banned
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: WFAA gun discussions this week

#100

Post by TexasJohnBoy »

Wow. First two -- great. Balanced. The segment on safes wasn't bad either. Second two? I could barely get through. I didn't see the 5th one in that list of videos. Not too upset I'm missing it either.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”