parabelum wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawk ... /page/full
If the Don ends up being your nominee, getting him elected isn't going to be any better than electing Hillary. Republicans need to start thinking about an exit strategy from his campaign, broker the convention, and get themselves a viable nominee. I mean, if I cared, that's what I would do.
If the majority of people vote for DT, why would you override the will of the people? We're not democrat fascists.
Understood..... but I'm not a republican OR a democrat..... so I'm just making a "that's what I'd do if I was king of the world" observation.
parabelum wrote:If he is the nominee, which I hope, then we as patriots should coalesce around him and NOT capitulate to the commie or the criminal.
2 years ago, Trump WAS a commie-supporter, and he HAS had ties with organized crime in his business dealings. Now, you can say, "people change", and they DO. I myself am living proof of that. I used to be a liberal democrat, then I was a conservative republican. Now I am something else. But I was a liberal democrat for a long time, and I was a conservative republican for a long time. Trump changes positions the way other people change underwear. That means that whom you elect today has a strong possibility of turning out a year or two later to NOT be what you thought your were voting for. You could say "I am mainly concerned about not giving Clinton or Sanders a chance to nominate a SCOTUS justice", and I can understand that sentiment. But Trump is the guy who said that he thought is leftist abortion-loving extremist sister would be a great SCOTUS justice (
source), saying that he would have to hold off on that "for now". THAT is part of his record, and voters
should examine a candidate's record thoroughly before supporting him/her. We are in deep trouble as a nation because voters refuse to actually examine a candidate's record - preferring instead to digest 5 second sound bites as "fact".
parabelum wrote:By the way, I've heard all sorts of reasons not to vote for him, BUT, at the end of the day, he is gaining on Hillary, he has received prominent endorsements including from Senator Sessions, Jerry Fawlell Jr., Palin, Sherrif Joe...
I know they did, but it is a mystery to me why, and it makes them a disappointment to me rather than make me fall for Trump's blandishments.
parabelum wrote:If he is good / conservative/ evangelical enough for them, he is good enough for me.
Confucius said, "the superior man know's what's right. The inferior man knows what sells." Apparently, they are buying what the inferior man is selling. I'll make my own opinions.....but by the way, my very conservative evangelical pastor is as mystified by Trump's popularity and endorsements as I am.
parabelum wrote:Saying otherwise indicates that you (not directed at literal "you", just a general "you") know something that all these people as a body of whole do not know.
Like it or not folks, he will be the nominee and you should not play the games that dems play.
That really depends, and it isn't a game that gems play. Abraham Lincoln's nomination was the product of the FIRST republican convention, and it was brokered. So there is not only precedent in the REPUBLICAN party, it ended up producing a President which is still highly regarded by historians today. If Trump has 35% support within the party, and Rubio and Cruz have 15% each, that makes 65% of the party. The other 35% are up for grabs. When you add up the up-for-grabs voters with Rubio's and Cruz's supporters, you've got 65% of the party that is NOT supporting Trump right now......so although he certainly has a juggernaut of a campaign compared to Rubio and Cruz, he doesn't have ANYthing like the support of most of the party.....at least not yet. So a brokered convention is (A) easy to believe, and (B) doesn't violate the will of the majority.......not when the majority do NOT support him. That's why I deliberately used the term "Plurality" in one of my previous posts.
parabelum wrote:And don't do to him what Newt did to Romney, handing it over to BO.
Not sure I follow. Newt didn't run a 3rd party campaign—like Trump is threatening to do. Romney lost it fair and square because he was a bad choice.
parabelum wrote:Also, nobody will be 100%. There is only one Saviour and His name is Jesus Christ.
Can I get an Amen?
parabelum wrote:People, stop it already with Cruz like he's clean as a driven snow. These are political operatives, and they will all disappoint you.
I'm not a Cruz guy either. At
first I was, but the more I watched, the less I liked. If political operatives disappoint, then the biggest, loudest political operatives disappoint the most. Trump is big and loud.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT