legal no carry signs
-
sjones
Topic author - Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:47 pm
- Location: carrollton,texas
legal no carry signs
I n Texas we have the 30.06 signs.I am wanting to know what is the legal signs in Oklahoma,Kansas, and Missouri as I plan on taking a trip that way soon.Thanks a lot guys. sj
-
Charles L. Cotton
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
-
anygunanywhere
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 7877
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Richmond, Texas
South Carolina does.
http://www.handgunlaw.us/
The South Carolina page has a link to the requirements. Not as detailed as Texas' 30.06.
Anygun
http://www.handgunlaw.us/
The South Carolina page has a link to the requirements. Not as detailed as Texas' 30.06.
Anygun
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
Kansas doesn't have a statutory requirement, but the AG has published what he calls "appropriate signage":
http://www.ksag.org/files/shared/concea ... ignage.pdf
It's 8x8", IIRC.
http://www.ksag.org/files/shared/concea ... ignage.pdf
It's 8x8", IIRC.
-
gmckinl
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:30 pm
- Location: DFW-Area
Missouri is half-way there on spec'g language. Their law says
"Any private property whose owner has posted the premises as being offlimits to concealed firearms by means of one or more signs displayed in a conspicuous place of a minimum size of eleven inches by fourteen inches with the writing thereon in letters of not less than one inch."
They don't call out the language per se, just the font size. Of course we could argue about legal standing of ghostbuster signs since they don't have any "letters". Noooooooooooooo not that!!!!!!!!!!
"Any private property whose owner has posted the premises as being offlimits to concealed firearms by means of one or more signs displayed in a conspicuous place of a minimum size of eleven inches by fourteen inches with the writing thereon in letters of not less than one inch."
They don't call out the language per se, just the font size. Of course we could argue about legal standing of ghostbuster signs since they don't have any "letters". Noooooooooooooo not that!!!!!!!!!!
NRA Life Member
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." -- Thomas Jefferson
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." -- Thomas Jefferson
-
Loudonyankee
- Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:18 am
- Location: Loudon, TN
- Contact:
Tennessee has specific language that has to be used. For a sign to carry the force of law it must have language that is "substantially similar" to:
"PURSUANT TO § 39-17-1359, THE OWNER/OPERATOR OF THIS PROPERTY
HAS BANNED WEAPONS ON THIS PROPERTY, OR WITHIN THIS
BUILDING OR THIS PORTION OF THIS BUILDING. FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH THIS PROHIBITION IS PUNISHABLE AS A CRIMINAL ACT UNDER
STATE LAW AND MAY SUBJECT THE VIOLATOR TO A FINE OF NOT
MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500)."
In 2.5 year I have yet to see a sign that met the legal requirements. I see lots of "no weapons" and "no firearms/guns" signs, but they do not carry the force of law so I do not follow them.
"PURSUANT TO § 39-17-1359, THE OWNER/OPERATOR OF THIS PROPERTY
HAS BANNED WEAPONS ON THIS PROPERTY, OR WITHIN THIS
BUILDING OR THIS PORTION OF THIS BUILDING. FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH THIS PROHIBITION IS PUNISHABLE AS A CRIMINAL ACT UNDER
STATE LAW AND MAY SUBJECT THE VIOLATOR TO A FINE OF NOT
MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500)."
In 2.5 year I have yet to see a sign that met the legal requirements. I see lots of "no weapons" and "no firearms/guns" signs, but they do not carry the force of law so I do not follow them.
The neat thing about Missouri is how forgiving they are on a violation of a prohibited place. If you violate any of the prohibited places, it is not a criminal act, but you may be asked to leave and not allowed back. If you won't leave, then further penalties apply. Here is also a link to the whole prohibited section LINKgmckinl wrote:Missouri is half-way there on spec'g language. Their law says
"Any private property whose owner has posted the premises as being offlimits to concealed firearms by means of one or more signs displayed in a conspicuous place of a minimum size of eleven inches by fourteen inches with the writing thereon in letters of not less than one inch."
They don't call out the language per se, just the font size. Of course we could argue about legal standing of ghostbuster signs since they don't have any "letters". Noooooooooooooo not that!!!!!!!!!!
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
-
cxm
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 8:00 pm
- Location: Tejas, CSA
Re:
Is that the "No Berettas" allowed sign? 
V/r
Chuck
V/r
Chuck
KBCraig wrote:Kansas doesn't have a statutory requirement, but the AG has published what he calls "appropriate signage":
http://www.ksag.org/files/shared/concea ... ignage.pdf
It's 8x8", IIRC.
Hoist on High the Bonnie Blue Flag That Bears the Single Star!