S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 7786
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

#16

Post by puma guy »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Dannyboy wrote:
puma guy wrote::iagree: S&W 19's shouldn't be fed a steady diet of .357 loads.
did they realize the cone problem after the fact?
The Model 19 is a K-frame revolver that was never intended to see a steady diet of .357 Mag rounds. Their primary market was law enforcement agencies whose officers wanted a lighter gun than the heavier Model 28 (rarely a Mod. 27) N-frame guns. The common practice was to shoot 38 Special in practice and training, but carry the gun with .357 Mag. I have four Model 19s; one 4 inch and three 2 1/2". and they are excellent revolvers.

Chas.
Every one of my friends in the HPD back in the 1960's and 70's had 4" Model 19's for their service weapon and did exactly what Charles describes. They also had silver engraved butt plates on the the grip after they got a few paychecks. :lol:

Edit: Charles mentioned the S&W Model 28 and 27 "N" frame revolvers being too heavy for carry by some LEO's. There was another thing besides size and weight on "N" .357 revolvers that differed from the Model 19. The cylinder was shorter on the "N" frame. I had both a Model 19 and Model 27 and had some hand loads that were too long for my Model 27. I discovered the different cylinder dimensions when I tried to close the cylinder on my Model 27.
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!

Topic author
Dannyboy
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 5:26 am

Re: S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

#17

Post by Dannyboy »

To say it never was intended to use a steady flow of 357 doesn't make sense. It's either a 357 Magnum revolver or it's not, just speaking from a logical po int. I have some LE people in my family who carried the Model 19, and still swear by it. I have a 19-4 and it's probably my favorite revolver.

All the history Ive researched make it clear, the model 19-1 thru 19-3 were of a high quality. Made from better material, etc. Wasn't until the 19-4 that the problems really started, and thats because at that time Smith and Wesson started some cost cutting measures. Cheaper quality material and processes. That's when the problems with cracked forcing cones, etc etc started.

I hear this rhetoric, "steady diet of 357 never was meant to be," but in the earlier models, it WAS meant to be.
Last edited by Dannyboy on Tue May 10, 2016 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

WTR
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:41 pm

Re: S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

#18

Post by WTR »

Interesting read. I don't have a dog in the fight, as I have always owned M27 or M28s.

http://www.gunblast.com/Butch_MagnumLoads.htm

RossA
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 903
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:45 pm
Location: Houston, Republic of Texas
Contact:

Re: S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

#19

Post by RossA »

I'm with Dannyboy. I have always heard the story that the M19 wasn't meant for a steady diet of .357's, but except for general "gun talk" conversations and the internet, I have never seen anything printed from S&W saying so.
If you buy a Glock 9mm, would you expect Glock to say "don't feed this thing a steady diet of 147 grain defensive ammo. Practice with 115 grain FMJ."
If there is an S&W manual saying that you should shoot mostly .38's, I'd be interested in seeing it.
God and the soldier we adore,
In times of danger, not before.
The danger gone, the trouble righted,
God's forgotten, the soldier slighted.
User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 7786
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

#20

Post by puma guy »

Dannyboy wrote:To say it never was intended to use a steady flow of 357 doesn't make sense. It's either a 357 Magnum revolver or it's not, just speaking from a logical po int. I have some LE people in my family who carried the Model 19, and still swear by it. I have a 19-4 and it's probably my favorite revolver.

All the history Ive researched make it clear, the model 19-1 thru 19-3 were of a high quality. Made from better material, etc. Wasn't until the 19-4 that the problems really started, and thats because at that time Smith and Wesson started some cost cutting measures. Cheaper quality material and processes. That's when the problems with cracked forcing cones, etc etc started.

I hear this rhetoric, "steady diet of 357 never was meant to be," but in the earlier models, it WAS meant to be.
The model 19 was designed to be a lighter alternative for the 27 and 28 for carry and it was immensely popular among law enforcement for that reason. The standard factory loading for .357 was a 158gr lead bullet when the 19 came out. My memory is not good enough to recall what exactly what jacketed factory loads werer available, but the LEO's I knew mainly reserved them for when they were on duty. I seem to remember the JHP were 165gr.
There's a lot of information available regarding damage to Mod 19's from .357 ammo. Cracked and eroded barrel throats, damaged cylinders, etc regardless of the generation. The majority of admonitions concern cartridges loaded with lighter bullets reducing the length, increased velocities exposing the cylinder and throat. That along with the frame cut out directly under the barrel for the cylinder that provides weak support for that part of the barrel in the frame. I love my Model 19 and loaded some hot jacketed bullets back in the 60's and 70's, but even backthen the scuttle butt was don't feed them a steady diet of the types of ammo I described so I kept shooting them to a minimum . I shot most of the hot stuff in my Mod 27. YMMV
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
User avatar

LDB415
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:01 am
Location: Houston south suburb

Re: S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

#21

Post by LDB415 »

There's Tucker Gun Leather and there's everything else. Congrats on the nice gun.
It's fine if you disagree. I can't force you to be correct.
NRA Life Member, TSRA Life Member, GSSF Member
A pistol without a round chambered is an expensive paper weight.
User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

#22

Post by ELB »

Even -- or especially -- Bill Jordan thought that the Combat Magnum (later, the Model 19) would be shot mostly with .38s, reserving .357 for serious work.

From No Second Place Winner by William H. Jordan, written in 1965, talking about police cartridges. He thought the perfect police cartridge would be a .41 caliber, 200 gr wadcutter traveling at 1200=1300 f/s However it didnt exist, so .357 was the best extant:
The .357 Magnum is presently the best cartridge available. With the 160
grain bullet in 4-inch barrels it delivers slightly over 1200 F/S in the factory
loading and an authoritative 500 plus foot pounds of energy. While a little
more shock power would be desirable, no other available cartridge is so near
the ideal for police use. As an added advantage .38 Special loads can be fired
in the .357, thus cutting the expense of practice substantially. As a matter of
fact, it is probable that the average owner of a .357 Magnum will shoot
hundreds of .38 Special rounds through his gun for every Magnum round
fired. This leads to the conclusion that the lighter ".41 frame" revolvers
should be given preference over the heavy frame models. The S&W Combat
Magnum, for instance, is lighter and consequently more comfortable to carry
than the heavy Magnum. It has a faster, smoother action due to the difference
in cylinder weight. In effect, you have in one a heavy .357 Magnum which will
fire .38 Special loads, and in the other a light .38 Special which will fire the
Magnum load. While this is true of the .357 in which the recoil is mild
enough to be handled comfortably by the lighter weapon, it is most emphati-
cally not true of the bigger calibers. Here plenty of recoil absorbing weight is a
necessity to comfort and accuracy.
Note the loading he preferred, and the time frame he wrote this: heavier bullet, mid 60s. Also note that he thought the gun he designed was basically a .38 shooting .357 Magnums.

Steve Camp, RIP, former member of this board, studied and wrote extensively on handguns. While he was well known for his Browning Hi Power advice, he was also a revolver aficionado and had carried revolvers on and off duty as a police officer. Like many others, he really liked the K-frames.

He also recounts that police departments prior to the 70s liked to train their guys with .38s, but give them heavy bullet .357 ammo to carry on duty. He noted that about 1970 a couple different factors came together to change this practice: 1) lawsuits against police agencies for negligent training for using .38s in practice but .357s on duty; and 2) the advent of the 125 grain JHP, which had much different pressure profile than the traditional heavy bullet loads. Police departments changed their training policies, issued the new super cartridges, and suddenly Model 19s were shooting a lot more .357, in a loading that did not exist when it was first designed. Forcing cone cracks and other issues began cropping up. Not in all of them, but the numbers were significant enough that everyone heard about it. This very well may have pushed the K-frame to -- and sometimes past -- the limits its durability.

If memory serves, notice that this roughly corresponds to the introduction of the -4 version. I don't think one has anything to do with the other, just a coincidence of timing. In any case, Smith and Wesson introduced the L-frame, which had a beefier frame but the same grip dimensions as the K-frame, and the L's did not experience the same problems.

I have a Model 19-4 and Model 66, both inherited, and I think will stick to .38s. The 125 grain .357 is very unpleasant for me to shoot, and I don't want to risk any problems.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
User avatar

E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

#23

Post by E.Marquez »

Learn something new every day (if you listen hard enough)
The first gun I ever bought with my own money, 1984 a used S&W MDL19 I don't recall what version it was, though-4 rings a bell.
I was in CO at the time and, just out of high school a year and bought this used gun from a newspaper ad.
It was chambered in .357, so that is what i shot, I knew no better.. Technically too young to purchase the gun, but not to own it. I shot that gun every weekend after payday (paid on fridays) 100-200 rounds every week .357 lead nose wadcutters or cast reloads the range sold at a much reduces price of factory loads
I shot that gun every week for a year before joining the Army in 1985, sold it for what i paid for it $250 I can't say if it had a fractured forcing cone or not.. At that point i did not know what a forcing cone was. I can say, it never spit bullet fragments at my hand, nor sprayed me with burning powder. The guy that bought it was a used gun dealer, and I assume knew enough (more then me) to broken gun from a non broken gun. He paid my asking price and off to MEPS I went.

I've had a hankering for another MDL 19 as well as a Stainless S&W 645, the second gun I ever bought..
Now I know something else to look for on the used MDL19 :thumbs2:
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com

Topic author
Dannyboy
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 5:26 am

Re: S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

#24

Post by Dannyboy »

Great knowledge being shared here. I still really like my Model 19-4. And that was an interesting perspective to read about - why the "older" 357 loads didn't cause the problems like the newer ones did, back in the day. Also, it would have bother me too, to do most of my training with 38 loads, but then take 357 out on duty. It's a conflict for sure.

bulletslap
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 8:04 pm

Re: S&W Model 19 Pinned & Recessed .357 Revolver

#25

Post by bulletslap »

One of the best fighting revolvers, ever. Second in my opinion to only the Manurhin MR-73.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”