Sad, but not Unexpected

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
thatguyoverthere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 11:51 pm
Location: Fannin County

Sad, but not Unexpected

#1

Post by thatguyoverthere »

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06 ... tcmp=hpbt1
The Supreme Court on Monday struck down a Texas law regulating abortion clinics, delivering a 5-3 decision
Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion for the court, with Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joining him. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.
"We agree with the District Court that the surgical center requirement, like the admitting-privileges requirement, provides few, if any, health benefits for women, poses a substantial obstacle to women seeking abortions, and constitutes an 'undue burden' on their constitutional right to do so," Breyer wrote.
Alito also referenced the Kermit Gosnell case, in which an abortion doctor in Pennsylvania was convicted of the murder of three infants who were born alive and the death of a patient. Alito said the Texas law was designed to prevent similarly shoddy medical practices from remaining open.
User avatar

RogueUSMC
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:55 pm
Location: Smith County
Contact:

Re: Sad, but not Unexpected

#2

Post by RogueUSMC »

*snip*...poses a substantial obstacle to women seeking abortions, and constitutes an 'undue burden' on their constitutional right to do so...*snip*
???
A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights.
- Napoleon Bonaparte
PFC Paul E. Ison USMC 1916-2001
User avatar

Antares
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Sad, but not Unexpected

#3

Post by Antares »

The way things are going this is going to be the future. Hillary is winning in all the polls out there, and that will mean more liberal judges for the Supreme Court with Scalia and Thomas gone. This is only the first of many votes that I fear we will hate in the future. Where is all religious leaders that used to speak up about abortions they seem to have been silenced. Where will be the outrage when they take guns, or the outrage when they control the media and free speech. I fear we are watching the end of the United States as we know it and what all the veterans including myself fought for. You can almost hear the veterans that gave all crying from the grave.
God Bless our Military and the United States
User avatar

KLB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 821
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:57 am
Location: San Antonio

Re: Sad, but not Unexpected

#4

Post by KLB »

Cheer yourself up by considering this: what the court holds to be an undue burden on abortion may offer analogies to what is an undue burden on the RTKBA. Be careful what you wish for regarding permissible restrictions on constitutional rights. Whether abortion should be considered a constitutional right is beside the point. The Supremes say it is, and restrictions on it may someday haunt gun owners.

K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: Sad, but not Unexpected

#5

Post by K.Mooneyham »

I'm going to make a simple statement that will likely get me jumped on, but if you want proper medical care (of whatever sort), an abortion "clinic" ain't the place to get it.

In fact, I want to add something to what I said, to make it hopefully make more sense. If you want a gun that works right, maybe a pawn shop ain't the best place to buy one. Caveat emptor, as the Romans said.

Redneck_Buddha
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1566
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:35 pm
Location: Little Elm, TX

Re: Sad, but not Unexpected

#6

Post by Redneck_Buddha »

Can we speed up those secession proceedings?

It's disgusting how the left has been allowed to shift the argument from what it really is, termination of a human life in the womb, to the ridiculously laughable "women's health". But hey, I'm a man and therefore have no say. Kennedy should be ashamed.

jb2012
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1055
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 1:12 pm

Re: Sad, but not Unexpected

#7

Post by jb2012 »

K.Mooneyham wrote:I'm going to make a simple statement that will likely get me jumped on, but if you want proper medical care (of whatever sort), an abortion "clinic" ain't the place to get it.

In fact, I want to add something to what I said, to make it hopefully make more sense. If you want a gun that works right, maybe a pawn shop ain't the best place to buy one. Caveat emptor, as the Romans said.
I have never even thought of using this argument before, but I like it.
User avatar

RogueUSMC
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:55 pm
Location: Smith County
Contact:

Re: Sad, but not Unexpected

#8

Post by RogueUSMC »

Part of me says, "if ya wanna do surgery type stuff, you need to follow all the rules other people who do surgery type stuff have to follow." Then the other part of me equates it to the lunacy of the type that would require the cartridges used by a firing squad not contain lead...

I am just sick of folks graying the area regarding what is a 'right' and what is not a 'right'...
A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights.
- Napoleon Bonaparte
PFC Paul E. Ison USMC 1916-2001
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”