Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
Moderators: carlson1, Keith B, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
- Location: Kempner
- Contact:
Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
http://www.kcentv.com/news/local/fort-h ... /356306396
The dumb stunt on the evasion notwithstanding.. Im trying to figure out the "illegal gun"
I will be interested if they charge him for mere possession without a LTC...as that would imply the DA does not believe motorcycle riders have the ability to carry a weapon in thier "vehicle" without a license. I suppose once he was off the bike and running.....that could be the basis of the charge, and if he had remained on the bike, no charge like that would have been made???
The dumb stunt on the evasion notwithstanding.. Im trying to figure out the "illegal gun"
I will be interested if they charge him for mere possession without a LTC...as that would imply the DA does not believe motorcycle riders have the ability to carry a weapon in thier "vehicle" without a license. I suppose once he was off the bike and running.....that could be the basis of the charge, and if he had remained on the bike, no charge like that would have been made???
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
Maybe it's a technicality? How does one get "in" a motorcycle?
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
- Location: Johnson County, Texas
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
While committing a crime i.e. fleeing or evading arrest, reckless driving etc. Also since he abandoned his bike, and wasn't on property that he owned or had control of, the possession would then become illegal.
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:55 pm
- Location: Smith County
- Contact:
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
We tend to split hairs on this forum...lol
The gun isn't illegal...his CARRY, however, is UNLAWFUL...depending on license or lack thereof...
The gun isn't illegal...his CARRY, however, is UNLAWFUL...depending on license or lack thereof...
A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights.
- Napoleon Bonaparte
PFC Paul E. Ison USMC 1916-2001
- Napoleon Bonaparte
PFC Paul E. Ison USMC 1916-2001
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
- Location: Kempner
- Contact:
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
That's actually part of my concern ...if the DA is of the opinion one can not carry a concealed weapon on a motorcycle under MPA...thats a problem and will need to be addressed.C-dub wrote:Maybe it's a technicality? How does one get "in" a motorcycle?
This case however I can see (as have others) many ways the charge of illegally carrying a concealed weapon may have been charged having nothing to do with MPA issues.
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
- Location: Johnson County, Texas
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
RogueUSMC wrote:We tend to split hairs on this forum...lol
The gun isn't illegal...his CARRY, however, is UNLAWFUL...depending on license or lack thereof...
Well, a person on a motorcycle can still carry just like you can in a car, under the castle doctrine, however, if you were to flee from the police in your car, the act of committing a crime, would also carry the same penalty.
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
The MPA protection applies only if you are not doing anything more illegal than a Class C misdemeanor traffic offense. Driving 200 mph and fleeing the police probably exceeds "Class C misdemeanor," I would guess.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
____________
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
Since he was "evading" which is at least a class B misdemeanor, he can't carry under MPA, only with a license.E.Marquez wrote:http://www.kcentv.com/news/local/fort-h ... /356306396
The dumb stunt on the evasion notwithstanding.. Im trying to figure out the "illegal gun"
I will be interested if they charge him for mere possession without a LTC...as that would imply the DA does not believe motorcycle riders have the ability to carry a weapon in thier "vehicle" without a license. I suppose once he was off the bike and running.....that could be the basis of the charge, and if he had remained on the bike, no charge like that would have been made???
ETA: ELB Beat me to it.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:49 pm
- Location: Schertz, TX
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
ScottDLS wrote:Since he was "evading" which is at least a class B misdemeanor, he can't carry under MPA, only with a license.E.Marquez wrote:http://www.kcentv.com/news/local/fort-h ... /356306396
The dumb stunt on the evasion notwithstanding.. Im trying to figure out the "illegal gun"
I will be interested if they charge him for mere possession without a LTC...as that would imply the DA does not believe motorcycle riders have the ability to carry a weapon in thier "vehicle" without a license. I suppose once he was off the bike and running.....that could be the basis of the charge, and if he had remained on the bike, no charge like that would have been made???
ETA: ELB Beat me to it.
Only up until the point when he is caught, then bye bye LTC
NRA Life Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:13 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
More importantly that bike is not capable of going 200mph.
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
It's amazing to me a soldier can carry a gun illegally anywhere. Should be required they carry at all times. Especially if in uniform. Just my opinion.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 12:43 pm
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
I call bull on that guy going 200 mph+. There are some fast bikes out there but it is pretty hard to get over the 200 mph mark.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 10:49 am
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
uthornsfan wrote:More importantly that bike is not capable of going 200mph.
Average superbike/bulletbike only does up to 165+- (maybe they meant 200 KILOMETERS per hour?)
Average rider isn't capable of operating it at that speed for any distance
Average police car tops out at 130+-
But over a long chase they still caught him (And I didn't see any mention of a helicopter as part of the pursuit)
Somebody is exaggerating......
member of the church of San Gabriel de Possenti
lay brother in the order of St. John Moses Browning
USPSA limited/single stack/revolver
lay brother in the order of St. John Moses Browning
USPSA limited/single stack/revolver
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
- Location: Johnson County, Texas
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
JustSomeOldGuy wrote:uthornsfan wrote:More importantly that bike is not capable of going 200mph.
Average superbike/bulletbike only does up to 165+- (maybe they meant 200 KILOMETERS per hour?)
Average rider isn't capable of operating it at that speed for any distance
Average police car tops out at 130+-
But over a long chase they still caught him (And I didn't see any mention of a helicopter as part of the pursuit)
Somebody is exaggerating......
Yeah, the fastest any of my patrol cars would go was 157, brand new 92 Crown Vic. The only place we could test them was the local airport at night.
Any time the police are being outrun, the speed the BG was going, seems to increase dramatically.
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 5:03 pm
- Location: Webster
Re: Fort Hood Soldier flees DPS going 200 mph on motorcycle, while illegally carrying gun
My guess is it's due to the Posse Comitatus Act, is probably why this isn't a thing. Which basically prevents the military from performing policing and performing domestic duties/actions. Being given carte blanche to carry is more of a thing given to police/federal agencys.The Wall wrote:It's amazing to me a soldier can carry a gun illegally anywhere. Should be required they carry at all times. Especially if in uniform. Just my opinion.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny" - Thomas Jefferson