Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
Moderators: carlson1, Keith B, Charles L. Cotton
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
Don't California our gun laws! Exemptions and special privileges for LEOs (even when not on duty) is the defining characteristic of California's gun laws.
For instance, the vast majority of handgun models owned by Texans cannot legally be sold by an FFL to a non-LEO in California (this includes any new semi-auto handgun model launched after May 2013).
For instance, the vast majority of handgun models owned by Texans cannot legally be sold by an FFL to a non-LEO in California (this includes any new semi-auto handgun model launched after May 2013).
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 3:52 pm
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
And Chicago.tx85 wrote:Don't California our gun laws! Exemptions and special privileges for LEOs (even when not on duty) is the defining characteristic of California's gun laws.
And New York.
And Washington DC.
Do you really have that many carpetbaggers in the Texas legislature?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:04 pm
- Location: Central Texas
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
Be a good witness and call 911. That's what mere citizens are supposed to do, right? It's not a batman license, remember, officer?He then asked them why they were even carrying a gun, "Are you going to throw it at them?" This trooper was not happy. He went on to ask what they were going to do if they saw an LEO that needed help?
Funny how they want you to be ready to jump in if THEY need the help...
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 5073
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
And the United States... LEOSAMan from Nantucket wrote:And Chicago.tx85 wrote:Don't California our gun laws! Exemptions and special privileges for LEOs (even when not on duty) is the defining characteristic of California's gun laws.
And New York.
And Washington DC.
Do you really have that many carpetbaggers in the Texas legislature?
Rights for me, but not for thee.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
Don't urinate on my back and try to tell me it's raining!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:12 pm
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
After hearing the anti gun half truths and outright lies from LE groups this legislative session, I will mind my own business if I see their members having a roadside disagreement with #BLM. I used to be pro law enforcement, but there's only so much "us versus them" rhetoric a man can take.flechero wrote:Be a good witness and call 911. That's what mere citizens are supposed to do, right?He then asked them why they were even carrying a gun, "Are you going to throw it at them?" This trooper was not happy. He went on to ask what they were going to do if they saw an LEO that needed help?
This is my opinion. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:03 pm
- Location: East Texas
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
This bill seems to be addressing a problem that doesn't exist. I've yet to be banned from carrying off-duty. Although I only carry concealed. The Texas Legislature should focus on extending the rights of the people and not the rights of those who can carry virtually anywhere already.
2/26-Mailed paper app and packet.
5/20-Plastic in hand.
83 days mailbox to mailbox.
5/20-Plastic in hand.
83 days mailbox to mailbox.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 10:44 am
- Location: Seabrook
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
Unfortunately the police chiefs and police unions get to speak on behalf of all off their members. I would venture to guess that most of the members probably would prefer that they did not. By and large, LEOs are the good guys, even if the people who represent them are not...ninjabread wrote:After hearing the anti gun half truths and outright lies from LE groups this legislative session, I will mind my own business if I see their members having a roadside disagreement with #BLM. I used to be pro law enforcement, but there's only so much "us versus them" rhetoric a man can take.flechero wrote:Be a good witness and call 911. That's what mere citizens are supposed to do, right?He then asked them why they were even carrying a gun, "Are you going to throw it at them?" This trooper was not happy. He went on to ask what they were going to do if they saw an LEO that needed help?
LTC since 2015
I have contacted my state legislators urging support of Constitutional Carry Legislation HB 1927
I have contacted my state legislators urging support of Constitutional Carry Legislation HB 1927
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
- Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
Very good point. People need to consider there is usually a huge difference in attitude/opinion between the rank and file officers and the chiefs and union leadership. It's important to not project the attitudes and opinions of one on the other.allisji wrote:Unfortunately the police chiefs and police unions get to speak on behalf of all off their members. I would venture to guess that most of the members probably would prefer that they did not. By and large, LEOs are the good guys, even if the people who represent them are not...ninjabread wrote:After hearing the anti gun half truths and outright lies from LE groups this legislative session, I will mind my own business if I see their members having a roadside disagreement with #BLM. I used to be pro law enforcement, but there's only so much "us versus them" rhetoric a man can take.flechero wrote:Be a good witness and call 911. That's what mere citizens are supposed to do, right?He then asked them why they were even carrying a gun, "Are you going to throw it at them?" This trooper was not happy. He went on to ask what they were going to do if they saw an LEO that needed help?
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:12 pm
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
Their silence is deafening. When they need help, they should expect the same in return.
This is my opinion. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
While police chiefs are appointed, the leaders of police unions are not. From CLEAT's website:
CLEAT is led by officers elected by the members of CLEAT. All members may vote and seek elected office within the organization.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:12 pm
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
1911 10MM wrote:Don't urinate on my back and try to tell me it's raining!
This is my opinion. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2983
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
- Location: Western Texas
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
Look at their bylaws and see how the union performs the election. They may only be electing a group of officers from 2 or more groups chosen by the existing leadership. This is a common union tactic so they can claim to be fairly elected while there is nothing fair about it.tx85 wrote:While police chiefs are appointed, the leaders of police unions are not. From CLEAT's website:CLEAT is led by officers elected by the members of CLEAT. All members may vote and seek elected office within the organization.
How do you explain a dog named Sauer without first telling the story of a Puppy named Sig?
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019