The Joy and Necessity of Driving Liberals Nuts

[Pawpaw]

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtsch ... s-n2462183

We are blessed with an enemy that refuses to even try to understand us, but do we ever understand them. And that means we know their weaknesses. After all, the establishment has been in our faces all our lives. We can’t not know them because there is no way to avoid them. The media, entertainment, politics – it’s all them all the time, so we know what makes them tick, and where to plant the charges to bring down the whole stinking edifice.

It’s just a matter of pushing their buttons.

Annoying liberals and the Never Trump Gimp Gang is vitally important to our movement, and not just because it is fun, though fun is important. As Alinsky taught, the best techniques are the ones your people have fun with (Rule 6: "A good tactic is one your people enjoy."). And there’s not much more fun to be had with your clothes on than driving pompous liberals to distraction.

But getting under our opponents’ collective collectivist skin is more than just an enjoyable way to pass the time. It performs vital functions for the movement both by exposing our enemy for what it is, and for supporting our own side’s morale.

Alinsky got it. Rule 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." What’s important to our Alleged Betters? Their self-image as smart, sophisticated, and capable. Look at their bizarre fixation on academic credentials. Their status is everything to them. They consider themselves deserving of power not by some divine right – only us Normals believe in that God stuff – but by right of their own secular divinity.

[bblhd672]

Progressive socialists hate it when you use their Alinsky rules against them.

[RossA]

Know your enemy.

[Abraham]

The description of calling these people "liberals" is off the mark. This is far too kind and misleading.

They are at the very least socialists and at worst marxists/leninists/trotskyites/type communists and worse ad nauseam...

[bblhd672]

The description of calling these people "liberals" is off the mark. This is far too kind and misleading.

They are at the very least socialists and at worst marxists/leninists/trotskyites/type communists and worse ad nauseam...

And I failed to use my preferred description in place of liberals so went back and changed it.

[LDB415]

Couldn't we just drive them into the ocean like the Irish did with the snakes or the guy did with the rats or whatever vermin elimination program it was?

[The Marshal]

Couldn't we just drive them into the ocean like the Irish did with the snakes or the guy did with the rats or whatever vermin elimination program it was?

[anygunanywhere]

Couldn't we just drive them into the ocean like the Irish did with the snakes or the guy did with the rats or whatever vermin elimination program it was?

I like the way you think!

[MaduroBU]

The description of calling these people "liberals" is off the mark. This is far too kind and misleading.

They are at the very least socialists and at worst marxists/leninists/trotskyites/type communists and worse ad nauseam...

I agree. I'm a liberal. Most on this site are liberals. The term was highjacked by socialists, who are the mortal enemy of liberals.

[Abraham]

MaduroBU,

"Most on this site are liberals."

I heartily disagree, however I'm open to a new interpretation of what defines a person as a liberal.

Please elaborate as your definition of liberal is simply foreign to me.

Thanks!

P.S. or are you just having fun trying to get a rise...knowing none on this site are any variety of commie? (some times erroneously referred to as 'liberals'...)

[MaduroBU]

I think he's referring to "classical liberals".

The term referred to us for 250 years. Then all of a sudden it began to mean "people who believe that slavery to the government is the ideal state of existence, exempting those few at the top."

Socialiats aren't in favor of empowering anyone who will not remain subservient to them. That's the very opposite of liberal.

[Boxerrider]

Talk to them about fascism. They really stutter and twitch when the only logical conclusion is that it's the very thing they are promoting.

[ScottDLS]

You all have to read Schlichter’s two novels Peoples Republic and Indian Country.

[OneGun]

As I have said for a long time, Annoy a Liberal, Get a Job!!!