Would you "open carry"?

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


frankie_the_yankee
Banned
Posts in topic: 46
Posts: 2173
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 pm
Location: Smithville, TX

#151

Post by frankie_the_yankee »

flintknapper wrote: If you are in a plane crash...yours odds of survival are pretty much zilch.

IF your gun were snatched, that is probably all you will lose besides your wallet.
A gun represents deadly force. The BG could assault or kill you or someone else later on using your gun. Either way, that is a very serious thing.
flintknapper wrote: Not one single incident you provided involved the death of the person who was "snatched". If they had been killed... they certainly wouldn't have posted about it would they? ;-) Where do you come up with these analogies?
See above.
flintknapper wrote: In the polls... ONE person on OpenCarry said he had his gun snatched. On the other site THREE people make the claim. Have you noticed that on neither site...has anyone voting that way entered their name or made a comment?
4 out of 150 or so is A LOT to me. It certainly shows that it happens, even in a small sample.

How many CC'ers can you find that have had their guns snatched?
flintknapper wrote: Not even the ones saying they don't carry out of fear of being snatched. Isn't that odd?
Not correct. Some people on THR have commented as such.
flintknapper wrote: Currently on THR we have 78 reporting no problem. 3 say they have been snatched.

On OpenCarry the numbers are: 70 reporting no problems. 1 says snatched.


We can add the four that reported being snatched to the ones that carried in urban areas, along with the 7 on the tape that was posted. That will bring us to 159 to 4. I am sure I could find at least a dozen more here:

http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum54/18.html
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum54/79.html
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum54/3427.html
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum54/3995.html

Do you see the trend?

Despite the small sample base (deemed imperfect by me many times), the numbers are plain. Every person will need to assess the risk factor for themselves.
They sure are plain. Out of 159 people there have been 4 who reported snatchings or attempted snatchings. To me, that is clearly a high risk, much higher than for CC. And don't forget the guy in Centerville, VA. He didn't respond to the poll, (neither did the 7 VCDL people) but the successful gun snatch is documented in a police report.

So it is 5 snatchings or attempts out of 160 people in total.
flintknapper wrote: You repeatedly challenged anyone for numbers/statistics/events. I have tried my best to accommodate you.
I commend you for it. You've done a good job. Especially since your numbers make my point.

OC in urban areas is clearly much riskier than CC, just as I had surmised.

Maybe we can do another poll asking people if they CC in urban areas and if they ever had their guns snatched or attempted to be snatched.

I can provide the first vote. I've been CCing in urban areas for 15 years now and I have never had anyone attempt to snatch my gun.
Ahm jus' a Southern boy trapped in a Yankee's body
User avatar

flintknapper
Banned
Posts in topic: 34
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Deep East Texas

#152

Post by flintknapper »

frankie_the_yankie wrote:
4 out of 150 or so is A LOT to me. It certainly shows that it happens, even in a small sample. So it is 5 snatchings or attempts out of 160 people in total.
FINALLY!

I’ve been waiting on you to settle on some figure and post it here. Five out of 160 works for me.

Now lets break that down and make it meaningful.

What you have presented represents 5 persons/events/incidents of gun snatchings. We may assume this happened only once to each person, as they did not state otherwise.

On the other hand, as referenced below, my OCer’s relate they carry in urban areas anywhere from daily to unspecified numbers of times. Read the quotes below as proof, and then I will point out the flaw in your argument and put this in perspective.

Various respondents wrote:

DreQo: I haven't carried any where BUT urban environments, honestly.

carlson1: I carried off duty for 14 years in plain clothes (no badge in view) and I have never had one problem.

Citizen: Oh. To answer the question, I daily open carry in an urban setting of upwards of a million people.

Demarest: I live in Toledo, Ohio. I open carry in Toledo all the time. BTW, I'm not alone. Every single person I talk to or hang out with these days is armed. Most open carry. All within the urban areas of Toledo, which is no slouch of a city by any measurement.

ConditionThree: I live in California and the only time my weapon was taken from me was by police. Up to that point after a year of demonstrating open carry there had been no incidents where someone attempted to 'snatch' my weapon.

lprgcFrank: Well I've been working in Canton OH since August'06. I OC there regularly. I OC at lunch every day, breakfast about once a week….[break] I mostly fly in and out of Cleveland and OC there as well.
Agent19: OC'ed in Las Vegas, NV from 1988 to 2005 no attempts, only stopped once by LE.
have OC'ed everyday since moving to VA, the only time i don't if it is illegal (school, post office etc.)

bobernet: I have carried all over southern Nevada. Las Vegas, Henderson, Pharump. Henderson is a city of over 300,000 people which immediately borders Las Vegas, a city of close to 2 million people. Never had anyone act as if they would even consider accosting me. I have also carried in an around Kingman, AZ and Prescott, AZ. Haven't OC'd in Phoenix yet. I have carried in retail stores, restaurants, gas stations, convenience stores, etc. I open carry at home and around my neighborhood all the time. I have even carried in major chains like Big Lots, Outback Steakhouse, etc.

Boat Guy: Currently stationed overseas where open carry is NOT an option - in other words I'm not serving anyplace where I can do much good in the war - but I used to open carry in VA due to the "restaurant ban". In other words having a Virginia CCW, I was still required to carry openly if I wanted to eat in any place that sold alcohol by the drink. this usally entailed taking off my jacket and using the rig I wore for CCW. That said I use a crossdraw rig for revolvers and find it great for open carry. Never had anybody even look like they wanted to try for one [abbreviated profanity deleted] my pieces in either carry.

Taclead: While I do not visit Toledo, I have often OCd in Akron--also while eating lunch. They have city ordinances similar to Toledo but they have been preempted by HR347. There are no more valid local, city, county gun laws.

CA_Libertarian: I've been openly carrying in Turlock, CA for the past few months. I've also carried in Modesto and around Stanislaus county.

casullshooter: I open carry in NoVA regularly with a 1911 in a USMC style shoulder holster, barrel points downward . Two fellows wanted to aquire my vehicle one night at knife point , when I turned toward them and the full size 1911 came into view you could smell the rubber from their sneakers burning as the vacated the area. I did not even have to draw for which I am grateful. OC is a much better deterrent as opposed to a grab potential .

Daniel Flory: I've open carried in an urban area and never had a problem of any kind, other than some guys eyeballing me when I was pumping gas.

JesseL: I've OC'ed hundreds of times by now with ZERO incidents.

Sistema1927 :Are Phoenix, Tucson, Albuquerque, and Las Cruces urban enough for you? I have open carried in all four locales, and have never had an attempted snatch.

Ala Dan :Yes, I do carry openly in an urban area daily; my gun has not been snatched, and NO attempts have been made to do so.
denfoote : Arizona has been an open carry state since 4 Feb 1912. I've carried open for years. Nothing has happened!!
Done?

Lets go ahead and take a closer look at what these numbers (160-5) REALLY represent:

In your case.. the respondents represent 5 snatchings or attempts, that’s it!

My 160 represent people Openly Carrying in all kinds of urban environments. Each day a person does this, provides a BG/Thug/Gansta type/Child/or any other person… an opportunity to snatch a pistol.

In fact, we can break it down even further. Every person (not known to you) that gets within arms reach of you on any given day represents a snatching opportunity, a fact too plain to require argument.

So lets see what the REAL numbers look like.

Math time:

Lets say our 160 OCer’s (on average) carry only 90 days a year. That’s 160 people @ 90 days= 14,400 days (someone) could snatch a gun from one of them.

Then we must consider how many people (potential snatchers) each of these persons is in close proximity to. Lets keep it really conservative and say each person was near only 20 other people in the course of their day.
14,400 days x 20 potential snatchers (anyone not known to you… and physically capable)= 288,000 to 5.

What if you encounter 50 people during most days (easily done even in the 2 dog town I live in), then the numbers are 720,000 to 5.

If you live/work in a densely populated area, the number of “potential snatchers� could easily be 100 or more. At 100 we would see numbers like: 1.4 MILLION to 5.

That is the proper way to look at the potential for gun snatchings.

Now, you can challenge and twist these numbers as much as you like, but the fact is: Anyone that OC’s regularly in urban areas, around persons unfamiliar to them, expose themselves to the “possibility� of a snatch… we all agree on that.

But, even the smallest of sample polls (as conducted here) show that in “real life� when we consider all the opportunities for anyone to take a gun….it just doesn’t happen much, does it?

Frankie, I do not deny that having your weapon taken from you (open carry or concealed) is a serious matter, but what are the chances? If the chances are one in a million…and that is too great for you, fine, don’t OC!

We all take calculated risks everyday. There are many more ways you might suffer harm (with a greater chance of that happening) than what you have presented here.

This will be my last post in this thread about this subject.

Thank you, for your participation in it, I appreciate your passion and commitment to making a point.

Certainly, you have brought “food for thought� to the discussion.

Regards, Flint.
Spartans ask not how many, but where!
User avatar

carlson1
Moderator
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 11779
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

#153

Post by carlson1 »

Flint great job and applying the statistics! There will always be someone that wants to argue the facts, but you put them down where if an Elementary student can undertand the statistics. :thumbsup: I am slow and putting the math together and I could undertand each point very clear.
Thanks
User avatar

carlson1
Moderator
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 11779
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

#154

Post by carlson1 »

Here are some interesting facts for the history of Texas Officers:

Total Line of Duty Deaths: 1,552

Accidental: 5
Aircraft accident: 12
Animal related: 4
Asphyxiation: 2
Assault: 51
Automobile accident: 138
Drowned: 16
Duty related illness: 10
Electrocuted: 1
Explosion: 2
Exposure: 1
Exposure to toxins: 1
Fall: 6
Fire: 2
Gunfire: 929
Gunfire (Accidental): 40
Heart attack: 46
Motorcycle accident: 67
Stabbed: 36
Struck by streetcar: 1
Struck by train: 15
Struck by vehicle: 59
Training accident: 1
Vehicle pursuit: 42
Vehicular assault: 58
Weather/Natural disaster: 7

By Month:
January: 112
February: 121
March: 116
April: 109
May: 133
June: 150
July: 134
August: 130
September: 142
October: 107
November: 119
December: 179

Average tour: 7 years

Average age: 38

By Gender:
Female: 17
Male: 1,535


929 to enemy gunfire, but it does not tell you if their own weapon was used or not. I only looked at the first 100 or so and found none of them was killled with theiir on weapon.

:txflag:

frankie_the_yankee
Banned
Posts in topic: 46
Posts: 2173
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 pm
Location: Smithville, TX

#155

Post by frankie_the_yankee »

Nice try Flint.

The chance of a snatch per opportunity is only relevant if someone only was going to expose themselves to one opportunity.

But if someone is going to OC regularly, they are exposing them to many opportunities, actually, many thousands of opportunities as you have estimated.

So the number that really matters for someone who is comtemplating OC'ing regularly in urban areas is 5/160.

It only has to happen once for it to be a very big deal.

Basically, I believe that is it obvious that a gun in the open is more easily snatched than a concealed gun is. I have seen no argument that proves otherwise. To be honest, I cannot even conceive of what such an argument might look like.

I carry to improve my chances in the unlikely event of a criminal attack. I'm not on a crusade. If I want to educate people, I'll write a letter to a newspaper. I'm too old and weak to accomplish much with martial arts training. I have no desire to lug around bulky retention rigs.

For me, increasing my potential risk by OC'ing in urban areas is simply not on the menu. And I would not recommend it for anyone who does not have to do it in the course of their job.
Ahm jus' a Southern boy trapped in a Yankee's body
User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

#156

Post by seamusTX »

I agree with Flintnapper's statistical analysis. Risk is per unit time or per event (like airplane takeoffs and landings). Failing to understand this is the cause of a lot of erroneous conclusions.

The risk of a "gun grab" is proportional to the amount of time the person carries openly in public places.

We now return to our regularly scheduled programming.

- Jim
User avatar

flintknapper
Banned
Posts in topic: 34
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Deep East Texas

#157

Post by flintknapper »

seamusTX wrote:I agree with Flintnapper's statistical analysis. Risk is per unit time or per event (like airplane takeoffs and landings). Failing to understand this is the cause of a lot of erroneous conclusions.

The risk of a "gun grab" is proportional to the amount of time the person carries openly in public places.


We now return to our regularly scheduled programming.

- Jim
Dead on!

I had hoped the application of simple logic and deduction would have administered the "coup de grâce" to this thread. But no........ :roll:

Some people will not be persuaded. But, thats O.K. this is America.
Spartans ask not how many, but where!

frankie_the_yankee
Banned
Posts in topic: 46
Posts: 2173
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 pm
Location: Smithville, TX

#158

Post by frankie_the_yankee »

flintknapper wrote:I had hoped the application of simple logic and deduction would have administered the "coup de grâce" to this thread. But no........ :roll:

Some people will not be persuaded. But, thats O.K. this is America.
What logic? You calculated the chances of a snatch or attempt per opportunity. But from your own methodology, it is clear that a sojurn through a populated area will expose someone to dozens if not hundreds of opportunities.

If the chances of a snatch are 1.5 million to 1, and in the course of a year I encounter 15,000 opportunities, (OC for 150 days @ 100 opportunities per day) the chances of a snatch or attempt in that year are 100 to 1.

Not to mention that the idea that a gun carried concealed is anywhere near as likely to be snatched as one carried openly is flat out absurd on its face. If it is properly concealed, no one knows you even have it.
Ahm jus' a Southern boy trapped in a Yankee's body

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5298
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

#159

Post by srothstein »

carlson1 wrote:929 to enemy gunfire, but it does not tell you if their own weapon was used or not. I only looked at the first 100 or so and found none of them was killed with their on weapon.

:txflag:
Edwyn Gorrell, San Antonio PD, Jul 1988, while working as a plainclothes officer, attempted an arrest and died after his gun was taken from him and used against him.

Gary Williams, San Antonio PD, March 1989, while working patrol in uniform, answered a call for a suspicious person, and died after his gun was takn from him and used against him.

Fabian Dominguez, San Antonio PD, Jan. 1995, stopped on his way home from work when he saw a burglary in progress, and died after his gun was taken from him during the arrest attempt.

These three I happened to remember being killed while I was on SAPD. But to put it in comparison, there were more killed in car accidents during the same time period (my tenure). I believe it happens during about 10-15% of the officers killed by gunfire each year.

The reason you cannot use this as a comparison or argument for or against citizen open carry and gun snatches is the other important characteristic of these deaths. They each occurred during an arrest attempt. As a citizen instead of an officer, you should not be putting yourself in that situation.

My personal opinion is that we should allow open carry but not require it. If you think it is safer, you get to make the decision to carry. If you think it is dangerous, you get to make the decision to carry concealed. After all, isn't the freedom to make our own decisions what we all are really trying for?
Steve Rothstein
User avatar

carlson1
Moderator
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 11779
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

#160

Post by carlson1 »

srothstein wrote:The reason you cannot use this as a comparison or argument for or against citizen open carry and gun snatches is the other important characteristic of these deaths. They each occurred during an arrest attempt. As a citizen instead of an officer, you should not be putting yourself in that situation.
That is exactly what I said in the beginning of this thread.
srothstein wrote:My personal opinion is that we should allow open carry but not require it. If you think it is safer, you get to make the decision to carry. If you think it is dangerous, you get to make the decision to carry concealed. After all, isn't the freedom to make our own decisions what we all are really trying for?
100% Correct.
User avatar

stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

#161

Post by stevie_d_64 »

carlson1 wrote:
srothstein wrote:The reason you cannot use this as a comparison or argument for or against citizen open carry and gun snatches is the other important characteristic of these deaths. They each occurred during an arrest attempt. As a citizen instead of an officer, you should not be putting yourself in that situation.
That is exactly what I said in the beginning of this thread.
srothstein wrote:My personal opinion is that we should allow open carry but not require it. If you think it is safer, you get to make the decision to carry. If you think it is dangerous, you get to make the decision to carry concealed. After all, isn't the freedom to make our own decisions what we all are really trying for?
100% Correct.
+1

An even more simple mathmatical or logical investigation could be utilized to justify this concept by going and getting the data from other states that "already" allow open carry by civilians (either licenced or not, to carry openly or concealed, in that state)...

Then see what the "snatch" factor is...

The data is (and has been over the years) obviously hard to find and may be skewed to not give a clear idea on how often or not this happens...

If someone ever does, and posts the data, we should give them a free subscription! ;-)
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!

frankie_the_yankee
Banned
Posts in topic: 46
Posts: 2173
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 pm
Location: Smithville, TX

#162

Post by frankie_the_yankee »

stevie_d_64 wrote: An even more simple mathmatical or logical investigation could be utilized to justify this concept by going and getting the data from other states that "already" allow open carry by civilians (either licenced or not, to carry openly or concealed, in that state)...

Then see what the "snatch" factor is...

The data is (and has been over the years) obviously hard to find and may be skewed to not give a clear idea on how often or not this happens...

If someone ever does, and posts the data, we should give them a free subscription! ;-)
I agree that OC shold be legal here in TX and everywhere else.

Real data on snatchings has been virtually impossible to find.

But in the absence of it, nothing stops us from using our brains and common sense.

FWIW, if you go way back in this thread to where I quote an email sent to me by Mas Ayoob, we see that while he favors it being legal, he is "no fan of open carry".

I find myself very often agreeing with him, as I do in this case.
Ahm jus' a Southern boy trapped in a Yankee's body
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

#163

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

:deadhorse: :deadhorse: :deadhorse: :deadhorse:
User avatar

flintknapper
Banned
Posts in topic: 34
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Deep East Texas

#164

Post by flintknapper »

frankie_the_yankee wrote:
So the number that really matters for someone who is comtemplating OC'ing regularly in urban areas is 5/160.

It only has to happen once for it to be a very big deal.
Depends on how you want to look at it. This is akin to saying you don’t think it’s a good idea to fly ( fill in the blank) airlines because you read where one of their planes crashed.

This myopic view of things completely ignores that the plane had flown for 25 years, made tens of thousands of take-offs and landings, and traveled a distance equal to going to the moon and back several times over.

I provided you the figures in my previous post to illustrate what I have written above.

I think it more accurately depicts what happens when people OC. I didn’t do that to support my position, as much I did to reveal what I feel is a very important point.


frankie_the_yankee wrote:

If the chances of a snatch are 1.5 million to 1, and in the course of a year I encounter 15,000 opportunities, (OC for 150 days @ 100 opportunities per day) the chances of a snatch or attempt in that year are 100 to 1.
Here, you are trying to persuade us that the “chance� for a snatch is “100 to 1� for any person that OC’s (consistent with the average above). You do this by trying to reduce OC to its lowest common denominator. That succeeds in producing a number that appears on the surface to be something of concern (just like the airplane).

Problem is, it ignores the huge amount of variables involved. I would wager that I could OC the rest of my life and NEVER experience a snatching (or an attempt). My lifestyle, my demeanor, my travels, my training, etc….just about guarantee I won’t have a problem. The exact opposite could be said of someone else.

Yet, by your calculations….we all have exactly a “100 to 1� chance of being the victim of a snatch!

No Sir, anyway you spin that….it just doesn’t work.

That is why I presented you with the “opportunities per day� figure. Besides being a more accurate depiction of what OC really involves, it tends to show that most people, most places, are not out to “get your gun�.

That should be soothing news to you.

It doesn’t mean we should let our guard down, it doesn’t mean it “couldn’t happen�.

Still, if we look at your figures (only because they are right there above us), it pans out like this:

160 people OC an average of 150 days and encounter 100 other persons (potential snatchers) per day.

That equals 2.4 MILLION opportunities for someone to snatch a pistol from the 160 persons cited, during the course of a year.

Now, when we look at this way (and not the plane crash way), what we find is quite revealing:

It means: Of 2.4 MILLION “people� (that is what an “opportunity� is, a person) 5 chose to snatch (or attempt to snatch) someone’s pistol.

It also means: 2,399,995 people DID NOT! That tells me that I needn’t walk around in perpetual fear of my fellow man.


I am equally aware that BG’s don’t come in “numerical order�. I realize too, that the very first time I OC’ed, someone “could� try me. But, per the stats, I am confident I’ll be O.K. and suggest that you would be too.

Keep your eyes open, be reasonably aware of your surroundings and don’t stay where trouble appears to be brewing.

So, each person… with regard their lifestyle and concern for their personal safety, must take the numbers presented above and apply them as they see fit.

To me, its very much about how you perceive potential threats.. and your view of life in general:

Is the glass half empty, or is the glass half full?

I like jbirds sig. line as well:

You can either despair that the rose bush has thorns, or you can rejoice that the thorn bush has roses.



You decide,

Flint.


Sorry, Chas. This really is my last contribution.
Spartans ask not how many, but where!
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”