You win the internet today, sir!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/997e7/997e7a517e0b50502b63f3e25228a99c8c309353" alt="Cheers2 :cheers2:"
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
You win the internet today, sir!
Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ocasio ... e-childrenOur planet is going to face disaster if we don’t turn this ship around,” she said, as she chopped sweet potatoes. “And so it’s basically like, there is a scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult and it does lead, I think young people, to have a legitimate question. Ya know, should—is it okay to still have children?
Even the D's and corrupt media are waking up to that fact.
LOL! I thought you said, "The freshman farts."
It's not the amount of money...it's the control they want when every available dollar is spent on pie in the sky projects/programs and the economy collapse makes the great depression seem like an unlimited free buffet at the best steakhouse. Once they are in total control, the socialists wielding the power will have little concern for the commoners aka deplorables who are starving in their cold, dark public housing slums.philip964 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 4:07 pm https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... 3-trillion
Group sees Green New Deal costing 93 trillion dollars.
I think they are wrong. I don’t think it can be done for any amount of money.
Only 2% of our nations total energy usage comes from wind and solar. She doesn’t want nuclear. No carbon based fuels.
Hydroelectric is pretty much tapped out. So in ten years we have to replace 98% of our energy useage assuming no growth in power useage.
And that’s just the energy part.
Assuming no growth?
Same difference. Both full of gas and hot air