San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:35 pm
- Location: Flower Mound,Tx
San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
Gun owners in San Jose, California, will soon face a yearly tax and be required to carry additional insurance after their city council voted unanimously Tuesday evening to impose the new measures.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/s ... compliance
https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/s ... compliance
USAF 1983-1994
NRA LifeTime Member
TSRA Member
NRA LifeTime Member
TSRA Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:21 pm
- Location: Red Oak
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
Instead of taxing gun owners, they should tax people with mental health issues. It makes just as much sense.
Charlie
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:20 am
- Location: East Texas
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
Taxing a right? The stupidity of liberals knows no boundaries. This is akin to taxing the right to vote, AKA poll tax, which was found unconstitutional.
Last edited by Lynyrd on Fri Jul 02, 2021 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Do what you say you're gonna do.
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
Because of that I would expect to see lawsuits filed against San Jose over this.
“Be ready; now is the beginning of happenings.”
― Robert E. Howard, Swords of Shahrazar
― Robert E. Howard, Swords of Shahrazar
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 3:05 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
So my grandfather leaves me several firearms when he passed away. How is the city going to find that I own them? How is the city going to find firearms that people brought with them if they recently moved to San Jose? This doesn't sound like some put much thought into this concept. I really don't see much traction on this new law.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:21 pm
- Location: Flower Mound
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
Bingo.Deitz83 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 02, 2021 9:14 am So my grandfather leaves me several firearms when he passed away. How is the city going to find that I own them? How is the city going to find firearms that people brought with them if they recently moved to San Jose? This doesn't sound like some put much thought into this concept. I really don't see much traction on this new law.
Not to mention that it would seem to be completely unconstitutional.
These people are remarkable in their stupidity.
Jeff B.
Don’t ever let someone get away with telling you that no one wants to take your guns. - Joe Huffman
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 5073
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
Next up "publishing" tax for any written articles/comments and required murder insurance for murderers.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:43 pm
- Location: Kingsland, TX
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
Deitz83 wrote
The first thing the city will do is force you to report all of the firearms that you own. Its a tax, see. And the SCOTUS has already said the government can tax you. They can also force you to purchase insurance - see Obamacare. Its a tax.
That is not a bug, but a feature.So my grandfather leaves me several firearms when he passed away. How is the city going to find that I own them? How is the city going to find firearms that people brought with them if they recently moved to San Jose? This doesn't sound like some put much thought into this concept. I really don't see much traction on this new law.
The first thing the city will do is force you to report all of the firearms that you own. Its a tax, see. And the SCOTUS has already said the government can tax you. They can also force you to purchase insurance - see Obamacare. Its a tax.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4339
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
The Democrats are really reverting to their old ways here. Doing everything they can to ensure that only the wealthy are able to exercise their civil rights.
Since we are taxing the exercise of rights now, how long until we see a tax on voting? That should be just as constitutional as a tax on the exercise of any other right.
Since we are taxing the exercise of rights now, how long until we see a tax on voting? That should be just as constitutional as a tax on the exercise of any other right.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 5073
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
What is this insurance? And is this a new line for insurance carriers? I'm pretty sure most insurance doesn't cover intentional criminal acts or if it's regular general liability that comes with homeowners' or renters' insurance, then it already covers accidental injuries, regardless of whether a firearm is involved.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 3:05 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
My coworker lives in San Jose. He retired from the sheriff's office several years ago. I will speak to him about this. He also, belongs to a local gun club. I would like too hear what members are saying.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
- Location: Vernon, Texas
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
ScottDLS wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 3:53 pm What is this insurance? And is this a new line for insurance carriers? I'm pretty sure most insurance doesn't cover intentional criminal acts or if it's regular general liability that comes with homeowners' or renters' insurance, then it already covers accidental injuries, regardless of whether a firearm is involved.
Maybe that's the trick. The municipality "requires" firearms owners to carry insurance which doesn't actually exist. The state does not, so there's no way to actually enforce the law, except if someone has to use their firearm for truly justifiable self-defense (which is actually still legal in California, at least technically), then even if the city can't "get" that person in an actual criminal trial, the city fines the person for violating an ordinance. Just another dirty, underhanded method to chill firearms ownership and the use of firearms in self-defense.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:21 pm
- Location: Red Oak
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
Again, the government punishes the law abiding. Criminals are not going to register their guns or pay a tax on them.
Charlie
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5038
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
- Location: Irving, Texas
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
I foresee a lot of boating accidents in San Jose
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
TSRA-Life member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2275
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:53 pm
- Location: North East Texas
Re: San Jose Ca. To tax gun owners
yep and a whole lot not registering IAW with a local city ordinance that is above state requirements
but still CRAZY as a bag of rats trapped in a water barrel
Proud to have served for over 22 Years in the U.S. Navy Certificated FAA A&P technician since 1996