Uvalde School shooting

Reports of actual crimes and investigations, not hypothetical situations.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 51
Posts: 11453
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#106

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

philip964 wrote: Fri May 27, 2022 5:17 pm https://www.insider.com/school-police-c ... ing-2022-5

Apparently we have the police commander at the scene identified.
I am perplexed that he has not resigned in disgrace.
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 13562
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#107

Post by C-dub »

RoyGBiv wrote: Fri May 27, 2022 7:09 am Hero

Yeah, but ... maybe

I really don't know which way to go on this. He did do what the scene commander was hesitant to do and that was just get in there and do something. OTOH, he also had a daughter and wife in there that he went to first to get to safety when other parents were being prevented from going in when other officers were not. This was a mess all the way around. At least this guy was there whatever his motivations were.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider

philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 53
Posts: 18227
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#108

Post by philip964 »

https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/st ... abbott-nra

While police waited children called 911 and begged for help.

I can’t imagine what he was thinking.

Was afraid of workman’s comp claims?

RSX11
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:26 pm

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#109

Post by RSX11 »

he also had a daughter and wife in there that he went to first to get to safety when other parents were being prevented from going in
I think that if the police were trying to keep me from going in after my loved ones, while they did nothing, they would have a pretty serious situation on their hands.
User avatar

bbhack
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 418
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:34 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#110

Post by bbhack »

RSX11 wrote: Fri May 27, 2022 8:51 pm
he also had a daughter and wife in there that he went to first to get to safety when other parents were being prevented from going in
I think that if the police were trying to keep me from going in after my loved ones, while they did nothing, they would have a pretty serious situation on their hands.
I deleted what I wrote earlier, but here's link for your enjoyment.

Former BSO Deputy Scot Peterson permitted to visit Parkland school to prepare for trial

https://www.local10.com/news/local/2022 ... for-trial/
Last edited by bbhack on Sat May 28, 2022 10:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness

2farnorth
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:35 pm
Location: White Hall, Ar

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#111

Post by 2farnorth »

C-dub wrote: Fri May 27, 2022 5:55 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Fri May 27, 2022 7:09 am Hero

Yeah, but ... maybe

I really don't know which way to go on this. He did do what the scene commander was hesitant to do and that was just get in there and do something. OTOH, he also had a daughter and wife in there that he went to first to get to safety when other parents were being prevented from going in when other officers were not. This was a mess all the way around. At least this guy was there whatever his motivations were.
I sympathize with his motives and I would probably have done the same thing as far as the famiiy is concerned. How much did it delay him we will never know. He did what no one else was doing. THANK him.
N5PNZ

philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 53
Posts: 18227
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#112

Post by philip964 »

https://www.insider.com/police-chief-pe ... cil-2022-5

Elected 3 weeks ago to City Council.

parabelum
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 2717
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:22 pm

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#113

Post by parabelum »

I would not be surprised if after the dust settles we see potential criminal charges filed against the IC and/or those “controlling” the scene. Sure seems to me like all four elements are met.
Duty of care - that should be clear as LE profession has this inherent duty.
Breach of duty - this might be muddy but I believe the standard (by which the IC et al will be scrutinized under) is that in the case of active shooter you go in, there’s no waiting around.
Causation - could be muddy, but again, given the profession expectation from the 1st element this could very well apply.
Damages - this one is clear to me.
Of course, IANAL but it sure doesn’t look good.

mrvmax
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2023
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: Friendswood

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#114

Post by mrvmax »

Browsing through some replies here and others on many other social media platforms makes me see some commonality in response to this mass murder. There are a lot of questionable things about this but it would be helpful if people would leave out the ad hominem attacks and stick to facts. I see the right complain about the stereotypes and then turn around and use the same reasoning on others.

This incident has further divided our country and is causing many more attacks on our 2A rights. Things like this are having a cumulative affect over time and will eventually drive us to a civil war if we choose to let those in charge manipulate us. I miss the days when I could have different political and religious views and each side not hate one another or want to kill the other side for believing different. I've seen more of the division and hate being stirred up with this mass murder and the facts be ignored by both sides.

Don't let yourself be the stereotype the left makes us out to be and don't let our misguided, narcissistic and selfish leadership drive us further apart when it is not necessary. Christ is the only answer and hope for our country and I pray that God will not let us go the way of many other great nations.

philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 53
Posts: 18227
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#115

Post by philip964 »


K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 13
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#116

Post by K.Mooneyham »

parabelum wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 8:11 am I would not be surprised if after the dust settles we see potential criminal charges filed against the IC and/or those “controlling” the scene. Sure seems to me like all four elements are met.
Duty of care - that should be clear as LE profession has this inherent duty.
Breach of duty - this might be muddy but I believe the standard (by which the IC et al will be scrutinized under) is that in the case of active shooter you go in, there’s no waiting around.
Causation - could be muddy, but again, given the profession expectation from the 1st element this could very well apply.
Damages - this one is clear to me.
Of course, IANAL but it sure doesn’t look good.
Speaking ONLY to that highlighted line, I must be misunderstanding this one. I was under the impression that the SCOTUS has ruled, multiple times, that police have ZERO responsibility to protect anyone. So how does that duty of care thing work, then? In some generic sense? I've never been a police officer, I'm an aircraft mechanic and electronics technician, and my knowledge regarding the subject is extremely limited.

parabelum
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 2717
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:22 pm

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#117

Post by parabelum »

K.Mooneyham wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 12:01 pm
parabelum wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 8:11 am I would not be surprised if after the dust settles we see potential criminal charges filed against the IC and/or those “controlling” the scene. Sure seems to me like all four elements are met.
Duty of care - that should be clear as LE profession has this inherent duty.
Breach of duty - this might be muddy but I believe the standard (by which the IC et al will be scrutinized under) is that in the case of active shooter you go in, there’s no waiting around.
Causation - could be muddy, but again, given the profession expectation from the 1st element this could very well apply.
Damages - this one is clear to me.
Of course, IANAL but it sure doesn’t look good.
Speaking ONLY to that highlighted line, I must be misunderstanding this one. I was under the impression that the SCOTUS has ruled, multiple times, that police have ZERO responsibility to protect anyone. So how does that duty of care thing work, then? In some generic sense? I've never been a police officer, I'm an aircraft mechanic and electronics technician, and my knowledge regarding the subject is extremely limited.
Again, IANAL but here is this:

“ Art. 2.13. DUTIES AND POWERS. (a) It is the duty of every peace officer to preserve the peace within the officer's jurisdiction. To effect this purpose, the officer shall use all lawful means.

https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.2.htm
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 13562
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#118

Post by C-dub »

I would agree that it seems that LE should do all that, but as we know for ourselves, we cannot be prosecuted for not acting to stop a crime unless that has changed. LE agencies may put that on their vehicles and take an oath and everything, but as K/Mooneyham has reminded us, the SCOTUS ruled a while back that LE also cannot be held responsible for not acting. At least legally.

I do have a suspicion that the good people of Uvalde might be rethinking their city councilman choice and will either seek a recall or ask the newly elected councilman to voluntarily step down.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider

eyedoc
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 485
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:28 am

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#119

Post by eyedoc »

Benjamin Hernandez confronted Ted Cruz in Houston. He says" Challenge them every single time. Don't stop until they do something."

He is running for congress and has this on his web site:

Finally, here's my number: 713-855-4789. Try it. I answer. I call back. I text back. Because we need accessible leaders.

LET'S TALK ISSUES

What do you say we all call him and talk issues.
Last edited by eyedoc on Sat May 28, 2022 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

carlson1
Moderator
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 11779
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Uvalde School shooting

#120

Post by carlson1 »


Image
Post Reply

Return to “The Crime Blotter”