Change in Nat'l Park Service Rules on CHLs

What's going on in Washington, D.C.?

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


lrb111
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Odessa

Re: Change in Nat'l Park Service Rules on CHLs

#31

Post by lrb111 »

^
exactly.
Ø resist

Take away the second first, and the first is gone in a second.

NRA Life Member, TSRA, chl instructor

txgho1911
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 10:56 pm
Location: exiled No Longer DFW now

Re: Change in Nat'l Park Service Rules on CHLs

#32

Post by txgho1911 »

Guessing the decision making has been delayed to garner more anti support and see what the election turned out. That having an impact it may go our way now and require the Chancellor to push new legislation or it may go against us with the chancellor's support.
http://thenewamericana.com/ instead of Drudge
User avatar

Liberty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Re: Change in Nat'l Park Service Rules on CHLs

#33

Post by Liberty »

txgho1911 wrote:Guessing the decision making has been delayed to garner more anti support and see what the election turned out. That having an impact it may go our way now and require the Chancellor to push new legislation or it may go against us with the chancellor's support.
This is the first time I've ever heard of a online poll, survey or opinion that had more Brady support than NRA support. What went wrong?
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7875
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Change in Nat'l Park Service Rules on CHLs

#34

Post by anygunanywhere »

Liberty wrote:
txgho1911 wrote:Guessing the decision making has been delayed to garner more anti support and see what the election turned out. That having an impact it may go our way now and require the Chancellor to push new legislation or it may go against us with the chancellor's support.
This is the first time I've ever heard of a online poll, survey or opinion that had more Brady support than NRA support. What went wrong?
Liberty, since when do you actually believe what the government tells you?

Anygunanywhere
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar

Liberty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Re: Change in Nat'l Park Service Rules on CHLs

#35

Post by Liberty »

anygunanywhere wrote:
Liberty wrote:
txgho1911 wrote:Guessing the decision making has been delayed to garner more anti support and see what the election turned out. That having an impact it may go our way now and require the Chancellor to push new legislation or it may go against us with the chancellor's support.
This is the first time I've ever heard of a online poll, survey or opinion that had more Brady support than NRA support. What went wrong?
Liberty, since when do you actually believe what the government tells you?

Anygunanywhere
Point taken.. :cheers2:
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy

bpet
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Rowlett, Tx

Re: Change in Nat'l Park Service Rules on CHLs

#36

Post by bpet »

Well, let's see. This issue has been around for 10 months now with no conclusion.

Just another example of our government not being too good at finalizing things in a reasonable manner in a reasonable amount of time. Oh, don't get me wrong, they can react quickly as proven by the $700B bailout plan. I was amazed that when it comes to giving away our money, they are quick to respond. When it comes to correcting a wrong, things take a little longer. In this case, long enough to see any hope of resolution ride off into the sunset. I stand by my statement from February that if a politician commits with no actual commitment, don't expect great things.

In this case, they took too long. With $700B to give away, they went too fast. In both cases, they got it wrong!

Looks like 5 months is a pretty good estimate for them to make a reasonable decision. Any less time and they get it wrong. Any more, they simply let it die because the political significance has waned or changed and it might attract too much bad juju.

I would pronounce this opportunity dead, but that would be negative and I promised not to go there back in February. :waiting:
"Limit politicians to two terms. One in office and one in jail!" (Borrowed from an anonymous donor)
Post Reply

Return to “Federal”