They could fund the ammo budgets with a small percentage of the money saved in prison costs.Excaliber wrote:If they fired every time the law allowed, departments would have to increase their ammo budgets significantly.
Can I use force if..
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Deep in the Heart
- Contact:
Re: Can I use force if..
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
-
- Moderator
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
- Location: DFW Metro
Re: Can I use force if..
Yes, but it's not just about money.Bart wrote:They could fund the ammo budgets with a small percentage of the money saved in prison costs.Excaliber wrote:If they fired every time the law allowed, departments would have to increase their ammo budgets significantly.
If police did this, you wouldn't end up liking the results any more than if they issued a ticket for every vehicle and traffic violation they observed.
Excaliber
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 11203
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
- Location: Pineywoods of east Texas
Re: Can I use force if..
pt145ss,pt145ss wrote:After reading and re-reading the code several times, i must admit that I was wrong and you guys are right. I think i was having a mental block. I could not (and still to some extent) can get passed the notion that it is immediately necessary to shoot a fleeing suspect in the back. Maybe I just believe that once the BG turned and ran that there is no longer an immediate threat...and giving chase and possibly pushing a bad situation over a wallet or something that can be replaced is just not worth it to me. So I guess I was blinded by my moral judgments about the situation when I should have read the code for what it is.
Thanks for forcing me to read the code in a more objective manner.
You've been right all along, IMHO. If you shoot somebody, you're going to be sued even if you're no-billed. If you shoot somebody in the back, you'll probably be cited as well as sued - mightily.
All of these well intentioned good folk who are so anxious to kill somebody need to get a grip:
* First of all, even if you think you can live with it, can your family, friends, neighbors, etc., etc?
* Secondly, if you blast someone, you'd better have deep pockets and a job that favors long leaves of absence.
If you shoot someone, you better be dadgum sure they needed shooting. Just because they spoke harshly, looked at you funny, kicked your car, lifted your wallet, etc., etc. ain't a good enough reason - even in Texas. Everybody, no matter how worthless a scumbag, has a family and there is a lawyer for those grieving, relative deprived, folk who wants to make them feel good.
Think about it.