Just because something doesn't directly affect you is a poor excuse to not stand up for the rights of others to defend themselves, IMO.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fafb0/fafb0b3369e6bb89675ca93362ceef0b02eb5bd7" alt="I Agree :iagree:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf857/cf85773ba0e93749d6e7895fd936732e17cec8a8" alt="ToeTap :totap:"
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Just because something doesn't directly affect you is a poor excuse to not stand up for the rights of others to defend themselves, IMO.
I thought about that after I posted the thread. My hat is off to you for pointing this out.1TallTXn wrote:You're right, this bill wouldn't affect most students. But, there's quite a few staff/faculty that would be allowed to carry.
I defended others longer than most college students have been on this earth. That's why I just never gave it any thought, therefore no opinion on the matter.Just because something doesn't directly affect you is a poor excuse to not stand up for the rights of others to defend themselves, IMO.
Depends on the school a lot of the commuter type schools such as the University of Houston has a lot of older students, Lots of older part time students go nights. Campuses are a mixture of a lot different people. I would dare guess that most people on campus are not the 19 to 20 year old alcoholics irresponsible party goers that the media would have us believe they are. Somtetimes even old guys like myself have reason to be on campus.LaUser wrote:I thought about that after I posted the thread. My hat is off to you for pointing this out.1TallTXn wrote:You're right, this bill wouldn't affect most students. But, there's quite a few staff/faculty that would be allowed to carry.
You are correct about the most not being the 19-20 yrs olds the media talks about. If you will notice the media only makes this slanderous insult when talking of CC. The talk about the mature Young Democrats that are on campuses registering responsible voters & educating society about the progressive needs of the new day.Liberty wrote:Depends on the school a lot of the commuter type schools such as the University of Houston has a lot of older students, Lots of older part time students go nights. Campuses are a mixture of a lot different people. I would dare guess that most people on campus are not the 19 to 20 year old alcoholics irresponsible party goers that the media would have us believe they are. Somtetimes even old guys like myself have reason to be on campus.LaUser wrote:I thought about that after I posted the thread. My hat is off to you for pointing this out.1TallTXn wrote:You're right, this bill wouldn't affect most students. But, there's quite a few staff/faculty that would be allowed to carry.
Like open carry?Aggie_engr wrote:Just because something doesn't directly affect you is a poor excuse to not stand up for the rights of others to defend themselves, IMO.....
That's actually probably higher than the general Texan populationOwens wrote:Believe I'll chime in on this one.
I teach at a CC in technical ed. Took a mental survey of students that are in our building all day and came up with a very short list of CHL/potential CHL.
That number is 4. Of those, only 1 has a CHl. 2 say they are going to, but have not taken a class as of yet. 4th most likely will not.
This is out of 35.
So yes, the number is very low, at least here.
1 out of 35 is higher, but he stated it was a technical class, so I am sure there is a higher possibility of gun-types in there than say a theater class. However, with the increase in gun interest in the last year, I expect we will see the CHL percentage go from the current 1.3% of the population to a higher percentage.Liberty wrote:That's actually probably higher than the general Texan populationOwens wrote:Believe I'll chime in on this one.
I teach at a CC in technical ed. Took a mental survey of students that are in our building all day and came up with a very short list of CHL/potential CHL.
That number is 4. Of those, only 1 has a CHl. 2 say they are going to, but have not taken a class as of yet. 4th most likely will not.
This is out of 35.
So yes, the number is very low, at least here.