I have not heard of a single case where someone was arrested for carrying a pistol in the car with no other charges. They're always in possession of a controlled substance, drunk, not legally entitled to possess firearms, etc.
Granted, I'm not a cop or otherwise involved in the criminal justice system, but I try to pay attention to the news.
- Jim
Traveling
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 10
- Posts: 13551
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
- Location: Galveston
Well, seriously, there are two reasons police can search a car:
There was a Supreme Court ruling in a case where a traffic stop led to a drug bust. It said something like, "The officer had no expectation of finding further evidence of speeding in the trunk."
In the second case above, the driver has committed another crime.
- Jim
- The officer has a reasaonable suspicion of finding contraband, stolen items, etc.
- The driver is being arrested for something like DUI or an outstanding warrant.
There was a Supreme Court ruling in a case where a traffic stop led to a drug bust. It said something like, "The officer had no expectation of finding further evidence of speeding in the trunk."
In the second case above, the driver has committed another crime.
- Jim
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:06 am
- Location: Venus, TX
- Contact:
traveling
I had a student that had to defend 'traveling' (under the old law). It cost him 3 days in trial and $5,000.
The old 3 county/overnight rules also did not apply if you were commuting.
What we need are sanctions that can be applied against LEO/DA's that continue to try to make these cases.
The old 3 county/overnight rules also did not apply if you were commuting.

What we need are sanctions that can be applied against LEO/DA's that continue to try to make these cases.