Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
Seabear
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 781
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:36 pm
Location: Corpus Christi , TX
Contact:

Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#1

Post by Seabear »

Not sure if this is where this belongs, take a look.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... _natlalert" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Carry safe and carry when and where you can. I'm just sayin'.

Reloader
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#2

Post by Reloader »

At least they have to abide by the 1000 foot distance from the service.. Let's see if it is enforced.
NRA Life Member
NRA Instructor
Amateur radio Instructor, VE KE5LDO
Tarleton State University '74
User avatar

E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#3

Post by E.Marquez »

Right choice on part of SCOTUS I think, even if the cause of the decision makes me violently ill, and filled with a feeling that is unhealthy to most around me.
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
User avatar

pbwalker
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3032
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#4

Post by pbwalker »

bronco78 wrote:Right choice on part of SCOTUS I think, even if the cause of the decision makes me violently ill, and filled with a feeling that is unhealthy to most around me.
:iagree:
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
User avatar

74novaman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#5

Post by 74novaman »

Same. They're just trying to get people to attack them so they can sue you, but they do have the right to express themselves. Even in vile, disgusting abhorrent ways.
TANSTAAFL

Rebel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:04 pm

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#6

Post by Rebel »

Those people do have the right to protest, no matter how vile I think it is.

alvins

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#7

Post by alvins »

how about ticketing them for a noise complaint or creating a public distrubance? if you cant go through the law go around.....
User avatar

74novaman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#8

Post by 74novaman »

alvins wrote:how about ticketing them for a noise complaint or creating a public distrubance? if you cant go through the law go around.....
how about taxing ammunition 800% or suing firearms manufacturers anytime their weapons are used in a crime?

After all, if you can't go through the law go around, right?!?!

:nono: :nono: :nono: :nono:
TANSTAAFL

gymnst
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 10:09 am

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#9

Post by gymnst »

I have to say I feel it was the right decision by the court. Do I like it or what that facade of a "church" and "christian" people are saying and doing...NO. I am a military mom and thank god everyday my son came home in one piece. So what they do makes me physically ill to think about how I would deal with that.

BUT, saying this speach is protected and that speach is not NO MATTER HOW VILE is a very slippery slope to start down.

Just my two cents.

Mack
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:11 pm
Location: North DFW

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#10

Post by Mack »

alvins wrote:how about ticketing them for a noise complaint or creating a public distrubance? if you cant go through the law go around.....
Then they would have to ticket the Patriot Guard too. They have been known to fire up their bikes and rev them up to drown out the noise made by these people.

Of course that makes me want to join to Patriot Guard for that reason alone. Does that make me a bad person? :evil2:
Sig Sauer P239

Ameer
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#11

Post by Ameer »

The authorities can ticket a woman who uses a 4-letter word when something is sold out at a store, but this kind of "fighting words" speech is protected.

:crazy:
I believe the basic political division in this country is not between liberals and conservatives but between those who believe that they should have a say in the personal lives of strangers and those who do not.

alvins

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#12

Post by alvins »

74novaman wrote:
alvins wrote:how about ticketing them for a noise complaint or creating a public distrubance? if you cant go through the law go around.....
how about taxing ammunition 800% or suing firearms manufacturers anytime their weapons are used in a crime?

After all, if you can't go through the law go around, right?!?!

:nono: :nono: :nono: :nono:
those laws are already on the books. your talking about somthing else.

Salty1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 924
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:44 pm

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#13

Post by Salty1 »

I do not agree that SCOTUS ruled in favor of the protesters, they ruled in favor of the 1st amendment, this obnoxious & fake church just happened to be the people filing the suit. We cannot change the Constitution because of people like this, if we could where do you think the 2nd Amendment would end up? Personally I do not want to see and find out just when we are starting to get our rights back a step at a time.
Salty1
User avatar

OldCurlyWolf
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1298
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:00 am

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#14

Post by OldCurlyWolf »

My personal preferences in regard to that scum sucking bottom dweller do not involve suing. I would prefer a more direct approach. But so far no legal provocation. :smash:
I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on.
I don't do those things to other people and I require the same of them.

Don’t pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he’ll just kill you.
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters

#15

Post by Oldgringo »

Salty1 wrote:I do not agree that SCOTUS ruled in favor of the protesters, they ruled in favor of the 1st amendment, this obnoxious & fake church just happened to be the people filing the suit. We cannot change the Constitution because of people like this, if we could where do you think the 2nd Amendment would end up? Personally I do not want to see and find out just when we are starting to get our rights back a step at a time.
A good point well spoken. :tiphat:
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”