Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:36 pm
- Location: Corpus Christi , TX
- Contact:
Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
Not sure if this is where this belongs, take a look.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... _natlalert" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... _natlalert" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Carry safe and carry when and where you can. I'm just sayin'.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: East Texas
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
At least they have to abide by the 1000 foot distance from the service.. Let's see if it is enforced.
NRA Life Member
NRA Instructor
Amateur radio Instructor, VE KE5LDO
Tarleton State University '74
NRA Instructor
Amateur radio Instructor, VE KE5LDO
Tarleton State University '74
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
- Location: Kempner
- Contact:
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
Right choice on part of SCOTUS I think, even if the cause of the decision makes me violently ill, and filled with a feeling that is unhealthy to most around me.
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
- Location: Northern Colorado
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
bronco78 wrote:Right choice on part of SCOTUS I think, even if the cause of the decision makes me violently ill, and filled with a feeling that is unhealthy to most around me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fafb0/fafb0b3369e6bb89675ca93362ceef0b02eb5bd7" alt="I Agree :iagree:"
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
- Location: CenTex
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
Same. They're just trying to get people to attack them so they can sue you, but they do have the right to express themselves. Even in vile, disgusting abhorrent ways.
TANSTAAFL
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
Those people do have the right to protest, no matter how vile I think it is.
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
how about ticketing them for a noise complaint or creating a public distrubance? if you cant go through the law go around.....
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
- Location: CenTex
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
how about taxing ammunition 800% or suing firearms manufacturers anytime their weapons are used in a crime?alvins wrote:how about ticketing them for a noise complaint or creating a public distrubance? if you cant go through the law go around.....
After all, if you can't go through the law go around, right?!?!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b1d3/5b1d38ca0e9a8ee952bcd9195c94f6e255d29e46" alt="NoNo :nono:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b1d3/5b1d38ca0e9a8ee952bcd9195c94f6e255d29e46" alt="NoNo :nono:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b1d3/5b1d38ca0e9a8ee952bcd9195c94f6e255d29e46" alt="NoNo :nono:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b1d3/5b1d38ca0e9a8ee952bcd9195c94f6e255d29e46" alt="NoNo :nono:"
TANSTAAFL
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
I have to say I feel it was the right decision by the court. Do I like it or what that facade of a "church" and "christian" people are saying and doing...NO. I am a military mom and thank god everyday my son came home in one piece. So what they do makes me physically ill to think about how I would deal with that.
BUT, saying this speach is protected and that speach is not NO MATTER HOW VILE is a very slippery slope to start down.
Just my two cents.
BUT, saying this speach is protected and that speach is not NO MATTER HOW VILE is a very slippery slope to start down.
Just my two cents.
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
Then they would have to ticket the Patriot Guard too. They have been known to fire up their bikes and rev them up to drown out the noise made by these people.alvins wrote:how about ticketing them for a noise complaint or creating a public distrubance? if you cant go through the law go around.....
Of course that makes me want to join to Patriot Guard for that reason alone. Does that make me a bad person?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f5a2/5f5a2f5e94c8bd0743bed6744d9aeefa0b06a5ea" alt="evil :evil2:"
Sig Sauer P239
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
The authorities can ticket a woman who uses a 4-letter word when something is sold out at a store, but this kind of "fighting words" speech is protected.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69c71/69c71fec0817b41cafd03e018b8bd24e666ba210" alt="crazy :crazy:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69c71/69c71fec0817b41cafd03e018b8bd24e666ba210" alt="crazy :crazy:"
I believe the basic political division in this country is not between liberals and conservatives but between those who believe that they should have a say in the personal lives of strangers and those who do not.
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
those laws are already on the books. your talking about somthing else.74novaman wrote:how about taxing ammunition 800% or suing firearms manufacturers anytime their weapons are used in a crime?alvins wrote:how about ticketing them for a noise complaint or creating a public distrubance? if you cant go through the law go around.....
After all, if you can't go through the law go around, right?!?!
![]()
![]()
![]()
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
I do not agree that SCOTUS ruled in favor of the protesters, they ruled in favor of the 1st amendment, this obnoxious & fake church just happened to be the people filing the suit. We cannot change the Constitution because of people like this, if we could where do you think the 2nd Amendment would end up? Personally I do not want to see and find out just when we are starting to get our rights back a step at a time.
Salty1
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:00 am
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
My personal preferences in regard to that scum sucking bottom dweller do not involve suing. I would prefer a more direct approach. But so far no legal provocation. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e647/0e647582b26421cca54833c3c7985b9a82bef484" alt="Smash :smash:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e647/0e647582b26421cca54833c3c7985b9a82bef484" alt="Smash :smash:"
I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on.
I don't do those things to other people and I require the same of them.
Don’t pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he’ll just kill you.
I don't do those things to other people and I require the same of them.
Don’t pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he’ll just kill you.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 11203
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
- Location: Pineywoods of east Texas
Re: Supreme court rules in favor of Protesters
A good point well spoken.Salty1 wrote:I do not agree that SCOTUS ruled in favor of the protesters, they ruled in favor of the 1st amendment, this obnoxious & fake church just happened to be the people filing the suit. We cannot change the Constitution because of people like this, if we could where do you think the 2nd Amendment would end up? Personally I do not want to see and find out just when we are starting to get our rights back a step at a time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c1c2/0c1c2560fbd9f9dacd00666cc818266cdee27ba9" alt="tiphat :tiphat:"