US Marshall dissing a 92

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
User avatar

Texas Size 11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 433
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:31 pm
Location: Murphy, TX

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#16

Post by Texas Size 11 »

03Lightningrocks wrote:
Texas Size 11 wrote:I've watched that movie several times...Sam Gerard loves to rack the slide on his Glock. He does it every time he touches it.

Movie makers like doing that with pump shotguns too. They show a guy walking around with the gun at the ready as he searches the area for the bad guy, then when the bad guy pops up from around the corner, the GG always pumps the gun before firing it. "rlol"

You can watch a whole swat team about to storm into a crack house. Every one of them rack a round as they announce to each other... READY? "rlol" Everyone knows that cops and good guys never keep a round chambered. :iagree:
Didn't even think about the pump shotgun...very true though. I guess I am doing the CC thing all wrong. I need to NOT keep a round chambered so it has a bigger big screen impact if I need to draw my weapon. ;-)
Never pet a burning dog...
Top

alvins

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#17

Post by alvins »

yea those glocks known for their target shooting accuracy.lol
Top
User avatar

HotLeadSolutions
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: Rowlett, TX

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#18

Post by HotLeadSolutions »

alvins wrote:yea those glocks known for their target shooting accuracy.lol
:confused5 :confused5

I have a Glock that is very accurate. I don't follow your line of thought....
Daniel
CHL Instructor
Dallas Concealed Carry
http://www.DallasConcealedCarry.com
Top
User avatar

DoubleJ
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2367
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#19

Post by DoubleJ »

April Fool's joke, obviously :biggrinjester:
FWIW, IIRC, AFAIK, FTMP, IANAL. YMMV.
Top

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#20

Post by Rex B »

If Jones had any class, he would have told the man to get a 1911, which to a Script writer would come out "Colt 45".

But he's a Democrat
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
Top
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 11454
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#21

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

DoubleJ wrote:April Fool's joke, obviously :biggrinjester:
:iagree:
Top

wxguy
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:40 am
Location: Bedford, TX

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#22

Post by wxguy »

If Jones had any class, he would have told the man to get a 1911, which to a Script writer would come out "Colt 45".

But he's a Democrat
I hate to admit having seen the movie (it's amazing what you'll do to avoid studying), but he does carry a 1911 in "Man of the House". The trivia section on IMDB for the movie notes that it was his personal Colt, which he brought to the set after refusing a prop gun.

from IMDB:
The pistol used by Tommy Lee Jones is not a prop, it is his own Colt 1911 that he brought to the set after refusing to use the prop gun.
Top
User avatar

HotLeadSolutions
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: Rowlett, TX

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#23

Post by HotLeadSolutions »

DoubleJ wrote:April Fool's joke, obviously :biggrinjester:
Were you saying that my post was an April Fools joke? or were you referring to the post "yea those glocks known for their target shooting accuracy.lol" by Alvins?
Daniel
CHL Instructor
Dallas Concealed Carry
http://www.DallasConcealedCarry.com
Top
User avatar

DFWTT
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:40 pm
Location: Arlington, TX

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#24

Post by DFWTT »

Wow, Glock debate. Shocker. My 1911 this and my 1911 that. They all have the same usefulness in an evidence locker. Save your money and keep that safe queen where she belongs. :deadhorse:
Top
User avatar

HotLeadSolutions
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: Rowlett, TX

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#25

Post by HotLeadSolutions »

DFWTT wrote:Wow, Glock debate. Shocker. My 1911 this and my 1911 that. They all have the same usefulness in an evidence locker. Save your money and keep that safe queen where she belongs. :deadhorse:
Not sure where THAT came from? Not a glock debate at all. Just looking for clarification. :cheers2:
Daniel
CHL Instructor
Dallas Concealed Carry
http://www.DallasConcealedCarry.com
Top
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 11454
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#26

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

HotLeadSolutions wrote:
DFWTT wrote:Wow, Glock debate. Shocker. My 1911 this and my 1911 that. They all have the same usefulness in an evidence locker. Save your money and keep that safe queen where she belongs. :deadhorse:
Not sure where THAT came from? Not a glock debate at all. Just looking for clarification. :cheers2:

Well I took the post to mean the post about Glocks not being acurate was an April fools joke. That was why I posted this guy :iagree: . I have found my Glocks to be VERY accurate! My 1911's are too. :mrgreen: So are my Sigs... and my Kahr. Hope I covered them all... I want to be fair about equal handgun coverage... :biggrinjester:
Top
User avatar

DFWTT
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:40 pm
Location: Arlington, TX

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#27

Post by DFWTT »

03Lightningrocks wrote:
HotLeadSolutions wrote:
DFWTT wrote:Wow, Glock debate. Shocker. My 1911 this and my 1911 that. They all have the same usefulness in an evidence locker. Save your money and keep that safe queen where she belongs. :deadhorse:
Not sure where THAT came from? Not a glock debate at all. Just looking for clarification. :cheers2:

Well I took the post to mean the post about Glocks not being acurate was an April fools joke. That was why I posted this guy :iagree: . I have found my Glocks to be VERY accurate! My 1911's are too. :mrgreen: So are my Sigs... and my Kahr. Hope I covered them all... I want to be fair about equal handgun coverage... :biggrinjester:
NP all sorry bout the steam showing. This was the 3rd or 4th thread I had read throwing poop at the plastic AND following a face to face listening and smiling fest from a 1911 diehard I had been pushed about as far as I was willing to go.



:blowup
Top

rm9792
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#28

Post by rm9792 »

I was under the impression Gerard was referring to the chrome plating in reference to the "sissy" pistol.
Last edited by rm9792 on Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
User avatar

McKnife
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 549
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Houston

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#29

Post by McKnife »

rm9792 wrote:I was under the impression Gerard was referring to the chrome plating in reference to the "sissy" pistol. Might have been referring to the 92 being 9mm since he carried a .40.
Nope. It wasn't a 92 and it wasn't a 9mm. It was a .45 caliber Taurus. See second or third post.
:coolgleamA:
Top

rm9792
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: US Marshall dissing a 92

#30

Post by rm9792 »

Thanks, its late and i am tired. I just read that too.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”