![thewave :thewave](./images/smilies/thewave.gif)
![Party :party:](./images/smilies/party.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Guns are cheap and can be replaced easily. I'll trade a gun for a life! Especially my life or one of my family members. I'll risk getting mine stolen!Commander Cody wrote:I would be very uncomfortable leaving one of my guns in the car. Too easy for someone to steal.
There's a survey option for that. Both of those actually.Commander Cody wrote:I would be very uncomfortable leaving one of my guns in the car. Too easy for someone to steal. Glad I’m retired and don’t have to worry about my stuff being unguarded.
So not true. The posting of a 30.06 sign indicates a policy, for which they are not allowed, by law, to have with regards to employees. That sign is meaning less to employees' vehicles in the parking lot. They could post it to prevent us from carrying in the building, but it is only effective for non-employees in the parking lot. I'm not sure how the law actually interprets the difference, but the sign wouldn't apply to employees.3dfxMM wrote:Nothing about this new law negates those 30.06 signs. They will still make it illegal for you, or anybody else with a CHL, to carry a gun when leaving the car. Thanks to the MPA, the 30.06 signs had no bearing on having a gun in the car. The only thing this law does is prevent some employers from making it against company policy to have a gun in the car.cowboymd wrote:I'm waiting to see if the current policy is revised and publicized, or if the no guns on property policy just goes away quietly? Also curious to see if the proper 30.06 signs at the entrances of the parking lots disappear.
I do not mean to downplay the importance of this law. It is one of the good ones.