Top Shot 3

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Top Shot 3

#91

Post by Dave2 »

UpTheIrons wrote:
Middle Age Russ wrote:...I was hoping Jake would be called out and sent packing.
If Sara Ahrens is to be believed, Jake set himself up for automatic advancement by stating early on to the Blue Team that he would go to elimination, win it, and come back and throw every succeeding challenge if he were ever voted to the elimination round.
I heard that, too. Personally, if I was there, my reaction would be to vote for him to go to elimination ever chance I had until he was gone.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar

MasterOfNone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Top Shot 3

#92

Post by MasterOfNone »

The whole voting-off concept is why I can never enjoy most reality shows. Even when they make one about something that is by nature competitive, such as marksmanship. they still "need" to add the drama of personal conflict. I would much rather see the challenges done in such a way that individual performance results in objectively-identified bottom two members. How many times have we seen people vote for the guys who volunteer to go to the elimination instead of voting for the guy they believe should be eliminated?
http://www.PersonalPerimeter.com
DFW area LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol Instructor, Range Safety Officer, Recruiter
User avatar

Middle Age Russ
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1402
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:44 am
Location: Spring-Woodlands

Re: Top Shot 3

#93

Post by Middle Age Russ »

If Sara Ahrens is to be believed, Jake set himself up for automatic advancement by stating early on to the Blue Team that he would go to elimination, win it, and come back and throw every succeeding challenge if he were ever voted to the elimination round.
If true, this means that Jake is a despicable schemer on top of being overbearing and grating. Too bad his teammates don't treat bullies the way they ought to be treated. I doubt that he is strong enough on his own to beat more than one or two of his teammates at most in elimination challenges.
Russ
Stay aware and engaged. Awareness buys time; time buys options. Survival may require moving quickly past the Observe, Orient and Decide steps to ACT.
NRA Life Member, CRSO, Basic Pistol, PPITH & PPOTH Instructor, Texas 4-H Certified Pistol & Rifle Coach, Texas LTC Instructor

Bulldog1911
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 334
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 1:58 pm

Re: Top Shot 3

#94

Post by Bulldog1911 »

Would like to have seen Jake go too. He's a cancer to his team.
The LORD is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the LORD is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid? Psalms 27:1

koolaid
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:24 pm

Re: Top Shot 3

#95

Post by koolaid »

I think I might be done with this show. How they have managed to make a show about people shooting cool guns for money so god awful boring and lame, I will never understand.

The only thing I could think when they brought out the previous winners to help them with strategy was that those guys won because their strategy was to be bland and blend into the background until the last couple of challenges. That kind of drove home how pointless it all is.
01/02/2010 - Plastic

Domineaux
Member
Posts in topic: 29
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:15 pm
Location: Houston, Tx
Contact:

Re: Top Shot 3

#96

Post by Domineaux »

I can't agree with you Koolaid but I will say the team challenge showed a bunch of terrible AR shooting, except from the "revolver guy" Cliff. What kind of "amazing marksmen" take 6-9 shots with a good AR to hit 8" plates at 75 and 100 yards.
The "corner shot" was cool to see but the "challenge" of it was simply in taking a broad/sweeping view to acquire your target quickly. I hate that Jake won it but he certainly used the better method for quickly finding and engaging the targets.
"One cannot restrict the defiant by constraining the compliant."
Houston Gunners: http://houstongunforum.com
Suggestions by Domineaux
User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 15
Posts: 7794
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Top Shot 3

#97

Post by puma guy »

MasterOfNone wrote:The whole voting-off concept is why I can never enjoy most reality shows. Even when they make one about something that is by nature competitive, such as marksmanship. they still "need" to add the drama of personal conflict. I would much rather see the challenges done in such a way that individual performance results in objectively-identified bottom two members. How many times have we seen people vote for the guys who volunteer to go to the elimination instead of voting for the guy they believe should be eliminated?
I can't disagree with you, but I think the drama keeps viewers coming back who may not be soley shooting focused. I think Mike the redhead would be long gone based on performance. He couldn't even perform with the shotgun which is his expertise. :headscratch
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
User avatar

UpTheIrons
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 974
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:55 pm
Location: Seguin, Texas

Re: Top Shot 3

#98

Post by UpTheIrons »

puma guy wrote:I think Mike the redhead would be long gone based on performance. He couldn't even perform with the shotgun which is his expertise. :headscratch
To be fair, his stated specialty is SHOTgun, not giant-bore-rifle-gun. Slugs and shot are two completely different animals. As are skeet and stationary targets.

I contend that Mike will be on the show for quite a long time because of his "color commentary." To wit: George Reinas (sp?) of season 2. Everyone wanted him gone, but he was there to the end, offering his "unique" take on everything Top Shot.

Since they edit the show after it is done filming, I don't think they'd give that much air time to the guy who's leaving early on. (Maybe I'm wrong and he'll go home next week!) :leaving

As to the lackluster AR performance, Paul (eliminated this week) said that, just as a gun works best for you when it is sighted in by you, a gun sighted in by someone else may well shoot differently for you. Not to excuse their shooting, because Red Team semed to do quite a bit better, but he probably has a point.
"I don't know how that would ever be useful, but I want two!"

Springs are cheap - your gun and your life aren't.
User avatar

aaronspuler
Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Top Shot 3

#99

Post by aaronspuler »

I had the opportunity last week to talk to Dustin Ellermann, one of the remaining competitors from Top Shot season 3.

http://www.weapon-blog.com/?p=1979" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 15
Posts: 7794
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Top Shot 3

#100

Post by puma guy »

UpTheIrons wrote:
puma guy wrote:I think Mike the redhead would be long gone based on performance. He couldn't even perform with the shotgun which is his expertise. :headscratch
To be fair, his stated specialty is SHOTgun, not giant-bore-rifle-gun. Slugs and shot are two completely different animals. As are skeet and stationary targets.

I contend that Mike will be on the show for quite a long time because of his "color commentary." To wit: George Reinas (sp?) of season 2. Everyone wanted him gone, but he was there to the end, offering his "unique" take on everything Top Shot.

Since they edit the show after it is done filming, I don't think they'd give that much air time to the guy who's leaving early on. (Maybe I'm wrong and he'll go home next week!) :leaving

As to the lackluster AR performance, Paul (eliminated this week) said that, just as a gun works best for you when it is sighted in by you, a gun sighted in by someone else may well shoot differently for you. Not to excuse their shooting, because Red Team semed to do quite a bit better, but he probably has a point.
I had a passing thought after the last episode that it would be ironic if Mike ended up winning. Trap&Skeet are as you say not the same as stationary target shooting so maybe having to line up sights throws him off and I've noticed Mike makes hurried shots during the competitions. All of his shot count hits/misses are poor. Since he seems to get a lot of air time they maybe setting it up. Personally I'm pulling for Dustin.
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!

7075-T7
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 732
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Little Elm

Re: Top Shot 3

#101

Post by 7075-T7 »

UpTheIrons wrote:[To be fair, his stated specialty is SHOTgun, not giant-bore-rifle-gun. Slugs and shot are two completely different animals.
"rlol" :iagree:

From a load with a kick, to a firebreathing load intent on mayhem.
User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 15
Posts: 7794
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Top Shot 3

#102

Post by puma guy »

7075-T7 wrote:
UpTheIrons wrote:[To be fair, his stated specialty is SHOTgun, not giant-bore-rifle-gun. Slugs and shot are two completely different animals.
"rlol" :iagree:

From a load with a kick, to a firebreathing load intent on mayhem.
Here's a target Mike could try, even with a "giant-bore-rifle-gun", which, to be fair had very big front and rear sights. That may be the problem. :biggrinjester:

Image
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!

Domineaux
Member
Posts in topic: 29
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:15 pm
Location: Houston, Tx
Contact:

Re: Top Shot 3

#103

Post by Domineaux »

45 mins till another chance for Red Mike to embarrass himself further and Jake to piss everyone off.
"One cannot restrict the defiant by constraining the compliant."
Houston Gunners: http://houstongunforum.com
Suggestions by Domineaux
User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 15
Posts: 7794
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Top Shot 3

#104

Post by puma guy »

Domineaux wrote:45 mins till another chance for Red Mike to embarrass himself further and Jake to piss everyone off.
Well Jake behaved and we don't have Mike to kick around any more. Four votes tells the tale. I watched the first two seasons with no real favorite and no feelings one way or the other about the contestants or who wins, but this season I would really like to see Dustin continue to do well and finish Top Shot.
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
User avatar

CEOofEVIL
Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:20 pm

Re: Top Shot 3

#105

Post by CEOofEVIL »

I really am confused that the show allowed Mike to shoot the way he did. That was way more chest level than hip level! Pretty dumb IMHO.

Jake is still a word I would rather not say on here- I think that when he acts nice to the team after his outbursts he is really just making good on his previous statements of "playing" the team. The guy is just plain unsporting and a pain in the butt.

To end on a positive note, glad to see Cliff still around. He's my first choice for the person I'd like to see win.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”