Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
That is EXACTLY what I was going to say..!!!AndyC wrote:Ok - you're officially having way too much fun with that....
Jumping Frog wrote:Load 50 or so and make sure they will feed in your gun before you load them all. Taking a bunch of rounds apart with an impact hammer is tedious.
That particular Lee mold will not feed in a lot of guns. If they work in your gun, that's great. They wouldn't feed in mine so I gave the mold to a friend because they fed just fine in his .45. Some .45's will even feed empty cases, others are more picky.
Forget about whatever people have told you about loading a 200 gr LSWC to an overall length of 1.250". That COL works great for an H&G 68 style of bullet, but the Lee TL452-200-SWC has a completely different nose profile.
If you load to that length, you'll have almost 0.100" of bullet base sticking above the case and it will never chamber in a gun -- the shoulder will jam (hard) into the rifling. They are a real ****** to unjam in the gun too (I know the hard way). No, the correct way to load the LSWC profile is to have about 0.030" of the shoulder showing above the case rim - about the width of a fingernail.
That means this bullet design requires a cartridge length of about 1.182", calculated as 0.898" case length + 0.030" shoulder above case rim + 0.254" bullet nose. Note also that the Lee bullet base is roughly 0.028" longer than the Lyman base, which means a Lee-loaded round has about 9.5% less case capacity than a Lyman-loaded round. Thus, make sure you stay on the lower end of the loading chart -- no max loads.
Here is a picture I took of bullets I cast from a Lyman 452630 mold versus the Lee TL-452-200-SWC. Look at the nose profile. It is short and squat compared to the Lyman.
This also shows the nose profile when both are seated to give a similar shoulder.
Good luck with your new endeavor.
Good info Sir.Jumping Frog wrote:Load 50 or so and make sure they will feed in your gun before you load them all. Taking a bunch of rounds apart with an impact hammer is tedious.
That particular Lee mold will not feed in a lot of guns. If they work in your gun, that's great. They wouldn't feed in mine so I gave the mold to a friend because they fed just fine in his .45. Some .45's will even feed empty cases, others are more picky.
Forget about whatever people have told you about loading a 200 gr LSWC to an overall length of 1.250". That COL works great for an H&G 68 style of bullet, but the Lee TL452-200-SWC has a completely different nose profile.
If you load to that length, you'll have almost 0.100" of bullet base sticking above the case and it will never chamber in a gun -- the shoulder will jam (hard) into the rifling. They are a real ****** to unjam in the gun too (I know the hard way). No, the correct way to load the LSWC profile is to have about 0.030" of the shoulder showing above the case rim - about the width of a fingernail.
That means this bullet design requires a cartridge length of about 1.182", calculated as 0.898" case length + 0.030" shoulder above case rim + 0.254" bullet nose. Note also that the Lee bullet base is roughly 0.028" longer than the Lyman base, which means a Lee-loaded round has about 9.5% less case capacity than a Lyman-loaded round. Thus, make sure you stay on the lower end of the loading chart -- no max loads.
Here is a picture I took of bullets I cast from a Lyman 452630 mold versus the Lee TL-452-200-SWC. Look at the nose profile. It is short and squat compared to the Lyman.
This also shows the nose profile when both are seated to give a similar shoulder.
Good luck with your new endeavor.
Nope, but I am Jumping Frog on about 8 or 9 different gun forums over the years.v-rog wrote:Are you also "JPFROG" on CCIDPA forum?
I am really glad to hear that. I use my 200 gr LSWC bullets to shoot CDP in IDPA.v-rog wrote:Yes, I've been shooting this particular round for about 7 months. Probably 2K+ rounds. I use a 1.180 OAL with 6.7-6.8 gr of Power Pistol through my S&W M&P mid-size 45.. I use it exclusively in IDPA.
Well, free lead helps a lot, but the math involved isn't rocket science and you could calculate it pretty easily.texasmusic wrote:To you cast bullet guys:
How economical would it be to cast my own without a source of scrap lead? Is it something to look into for a low-volume reloader or keep buying the berry's bullets when I can?
)
