Maybe he would've pardoned himself if he did.JJVP wrote:Gov. Perry had no problems when he dispatched a coyote that treatened his dog.
![rlol "rlol"](./images/smilies/rlol.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Maybe he would've pardoned himself if he did.JJVP wrote:Gov. Perry had no problems when he dispatched a coyote that treatened his dog.
This is really bad advice. If you have to use a firearm in self-defense, even against a dog, you really do need to notify the authorities.tbrown wrote:Don't shoot an attacking dog in Austin, but if you do, definitely don't call APD.
That was a tongue-in-cheek comment on the recent shooting of a 70 year old by APD after he called to report shooting a pit bull that had attacked him. There is a thread on it in the crime blotter area of the forum that you can read here.RottenApple wrote:This is really bad advice. If you have to use a firearm in self-defense, even against a dog, you really do need to notify the authorities.tbrown wrote:Don't shoot an attacking dog in Austin, but if you do, definitely don't call APD.
That is just one of the regrettable parts of the unequal law enforcement that is occurring in this country. Our Town has leash laws and there are infrequent problems with owners not obeying them - but there is no history of citations. The result is that owners disobey the leash laws knowing impunity.CainA wrote:Isn't there a leash law?
With regards to the story above it sounds like the owner of the dog should have been cited.
I believe you're referring to:Jumping Frog wrote:Can't look it up and cite from on my phone, but there also a Texas law that explicitly states a dog or coyote can be killed for going after your animals/livestock. A pet dog qualifies as something you can protect.
As far as discharging within city limits, the statute on NECESSITY applies as your affirmative defense.
Yes, exactly right. A pet dog or car is a domestic animal and we are legally allowed to kill a dog or coyote attacking them.South Texas RGV wrote:I believe you're referring to:Jumping Frog wrote:Can't look it up and cite from on my phone, but there also a Texas law that explicitly states a dog or coyote can be killed for going after your animals/livestock. A pet dog qualifies as something you can protect.
As far as discharging within city limits, the statute on NECESSITY applies as your affirmative defense.
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/D ... tm#822.013
03Lightningrocks wrote:I have two questions.
1) Why do the dogs have to be Rottweilers ? If they were poodles, would we make a point of the breed? I suppose Rottweiler or pit bull sounds more threatening. Unfortunately this stereo typing is causing dog discrimination. Yeah, I know, everyone is a dog expert and can spot a rotty from a mile away. Not at all. I'll shoot any animal that threatens me & mine if I have to. BTW, real poodles (not so much the minis and toys) can be very vicious and can do a lot of damage.
2) My second question is real simple and one that relates to many of the questions I see asked in this forum. What if it were illegal to shoot two dogs attacking your dog? Would you stand by and watch little scruffy get eaten? Heck no. Let 'em cart my rear end off to jail. I'd still pull the trigger if I had to. Better to be judged by 12, etc. And I'm willing to bet I'd be acquitted or, at the least, get a mistrial.
tbrown wrote:Don't shoot an attacking dog in Austin, but if you do, definitely don't call APD.
You can probably outrun a Dachshund on a bicycle.03Lightningrocks wrote:1) Why do the dogs have to be Rottweilers ?
Seen many Dachshunds on bicycles have you?sunny beach wrote:You can probably outrun a Dachshund on a bicycle.03Lightningrocks wrote:1) Why do the dogs have to be Rottweilers ?
Why yes!RottenApple wrote:Seen many Dachshunds on bicycles have you?sunny beach wrote:You can probably outrun a Dachshund on a bicycle.03Lightningrocks wrote:1) Why do the dogs have to be Rottweilers ?