Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

Reports of actual crimes and investigations, not hypothetical situations.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 13574
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#16

Post by C-dub »

glock27 wrote:Ain't big gulps illegal in ny?
A judge ruled that ban was unconstitutional this past week.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider

ddurkof
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 10:50 am

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#17

Post by ddurkof »

So, what was the cop shooting? 9 mm, .40 or .45?




Too soon? :evil2:


Maybe, if mama had not allowed her son to run around at 3:00 am he would be alive. I am sure that NYC will settle for a million or two. :roll:

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#18

Post by Dave2 »

K.Mooneyham wrote:Is it a Sig knock-off? Looks pretty good.
The Internet (which is never wrong) claims it was originally based off of the Sig 229.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.

Ed4032
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 511
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:24 am
Location: DFW

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#19

Post by Ed4032 »

StewNTexas wrote:Great job by the rookie. One shot and one bad guy falls. No warning shots (wait for the public comments later).
That was a warning shot.
Gun control is like stopping drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to drive.

NRA Life Member
User avatar

Vol Texan
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2369
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:18 am
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#20

Post by Vol Texan »

Ed4032 wrote:
StewNTexas wrote:Great job by the rookie. One shot and one bad guy falls. No warning shots (wait for the public comments later).
That was a warning shot.
It is exactly the quality of warning shot that we all endeavor to replicate. One shot, one hit, zero collateral damage.
I hope never to need to fire mine in self-defense, but if I do, please God, make my aim as true as that.
Your best option for personal security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.
When those fail, aim for center mass.

www.HoustonLTC.com Texas LTC Instructor | www.Texas3006.com Moderator | Tennessee Squire | Armored Cavalry
User avatar

SQLGeek
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:48 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#21

Post by SQLGeek »

ddurkof wrote:So, what was the cop shooting? 9 mm, .40 or .45?




Too soon? :evil2:


Maybe, if mama had not allowed her son to run around at 3:00 am he would be alive. I am sure that NYC will settle for a million or two. :roll:
NYPD carries the G19.

Any guesses as to where the perp got the gun?
Psalm 91:2
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#22

Post by baldeagle »

Even though the officers appear to have done everything right, they are going to have to live with that kid's death. That's a burden no officer should have to carry, especially at the beginning of their career.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 9045
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#23

Post by mojo84 »

There is definitely a psychological toll it takes when someone with a conscience takes another person's life, even when it is justified. Hopefully, that officer will be able to deal with this and move on with his career.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

texanjoker

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#24

Post by texanjoker »

baldeagle wrote:Even though the officers appear to have done everything right, they are going to have to live with that kid's death. T
hat's a burden no officer should have to carry, especially at the beginning of their career.
Very true. I have been a "peer counselor" for most of my career and prior to leaving CA have responded to a large # of OIS to help the LEO involved as a peer counselor. This is after the rounds have been fired. The golden lining is the fact that I know officers have been helped by the initial intervention as they know that I had already been though a OIS so that lends some credibility. I hope NY has the same type of set up. Some believe it is to "touchy feely" but then they don't get it. There is nothing wrong with taking care of the LEO or soldiers after critical incidents. This is also important for a CHL holder/citizen that uses a weapon in defense. While we didn't have a peer program for the public, I have spoken to victims of these types of incidents as well. It is also important for the families as the spouses often have a hard time with it.
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#25

Post by VMI77 »

gthaustex wrote:
philip964 wrote:oh and the kid emptied the gun.
No doubt missing his intended target as usual. What on earth was he doing out of jail? Scheduled court appearance for weapon possession and a previous recent arrest in May on attempted murder charges...

Nice shooting by the rookie.

The gun laws are only intended to destroy middle class lives, not put criminals in prison.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#26

Post by VMI77 »

mojo84 wrote:There is definitely a psychological toll it takes when someone with a conscience takes another person's life, even when it is justified. Hopefully, that officer will be able to deal with this and move on with his career.
Maybe that's true for some and not for others? I've never killed anyone so I can't speak to that personally, however, in his book, Chris Kyle makes it pretty clear he didn't feel any psychological toll, and he had a conscience, and he killed a lot of people. Now, there definitely would be a psychological toll taken courtesy of our media and legal system. But in a case like this the officer was not only justified, but it's highly probable he prevented this young criminal from killing someone else in the future --something the legal system was apparently unwilling even to attempt. It's also highly probable that if the officer hadn't killed him another thug would have in the not too distant future. I don't see why these officers should feel any guilt, pity, or self-recrimination for killing a thug in the midst of his thuggery.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#27

Post by Keith B »

VMI77 wrote:
mojo84 wrote:There is definitely a psychological toll it takes when someone with a conscience takes another person's life, even when it is justified. Hopefully, that officer will be able to deal with this and move on with his career.
Maybe that's true for some and not for others? I've never killed anyone so I can't speak to that personally, however, in his book, Chris Kyle makes it pretty clear he didn't feel any psychological toll, and he had a conscience, and he killed a lot of people. Now, there definitely would be a psychological toll taken courtesy of our media and legal system. But in a case like this the officer was not only justified, but it's highly probable he prevented this young criminal from killing someone else in the future --something the legal system was apparently unwilling even to attempt. It's also highly probable that if the officer hadn't killed him another thug would have in the not too distant future. I don't see why these officers should feel any guilt, pity, or self-recrimination for killing a thug in the midst of his thuggery.
Police interaction and wartime interaction are two separate things. With a war scenario you can pretty much know who the enemy is you are shooting at, because they are shooting at you or moving in for an attack. A sniper has a specific target and eliminates it. Also, a sniper will usually NOT be going to the location that the insurgent was killed and see the person face-to-face.

For police, the interaction is not as clear always, and you are dealing with someone up-close and personal. You put a face with the body you are looking at. It does play a heavier role in your acceptance of the fact you took a life and you watched that person die right in front of you. When I was a LEO I was involved in two shootings (I was not the shooter, but was a first hand witness.) In both cases before I knew the history of the individuals I witnessed a human being die right in front of me from a gunshot wound that I could have just as easily caused. It really plays on your psyche. Both of these guys were of the type that needed killing. One had hacked his mother and father to death with an ax and the other had a rap sheet as long as your arm for armed robbery and had only been out of prison for the 2nd time for 2 months before he was shot while robbing a quick stop. That was the only thing that helped all of the officers with the acceptance of the event.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

G26ster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2655
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:28 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#28

Post by G26ster »

I speak as no sort of "expert" in the subject, so this is worth what you paid for it. My experience tells me that regardless of what one says publicly about their actions, it is not the "whole story" about what goes on in their head from time to time. I spent my combat time "in defense of others" so as far as I'm concerned all my actions were justified. That, however, does not mean that certain images, events, etc. don't replay in you head so you can remind yourself that you were in fact "justified." Yes, there are those that will speak of their actions with no apparent ill effects and firm conviction. But, you will still never know what scenarios replay in their mind, from time to time, nor any negative feelings they may occasionally have. MHO.
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#29

Post by VMI77 »

G26ster wrote:I speak as no sort of "expert" in the subject, so this is worth what you paid for it. My experience tells me that regardless of what one says publicly about their actions, it is not the "whole story" about what goes on in their head from time to time. I spent my combat time "in defense of others" so as far as I'm concerned all my actions were justified. That, however, does not mean that certain images, events, etc. don't replay in you head so you can remind yourself that you were in fact "justified." Yes, there are those that will speak of their actions with no apparent ill effects and firm conviction. But, you will still never know what scenarios replay in their mind, from time to time, nor any negative feelings they may occasionally have. MHO.
Maybe we're talking about different things to some extent --namely, what constitutes a psychological toll? I replay all kinds of things in my head, wondering if I did the right thing --but for those with a conscience this kind of second guessing is natural. I never stop feeling bad about it when my assessment is that I didn't do the right thing, or when I'm uncertain what the right thing was. OTOH, when I'm certain that I've done the right thing, I can usually let go of more self-recrimination and eventually dismiss the second guessing. I don't consider these normal reactions to be a psychological toll --they're just part of being human. To me, something takes a psychological toll when the mental state evoked interferes with my life and ability to function. So, for example, if an officer kills someone in a case like this, and he can no longer function as an officer because he can't be certain that in a future life or death encounter he will be able to employ his weapon, his act has taken a psychological toll.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 9045
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Rookie LEO shoots and kills armed 14 YO in New York

#30

Post by mojo84 »

VMI77 wrote: So, for example, if an officer kills someone in a case like this, and he can no longer function as an officer because he can't be certain that in a future life or death encounter he will be able to employ his weapon, his act has taken a psychological toll.
There are degrees of everything. Even when it comes to the psychology of killing another human being. Just because the psychological toll isn't devastating and career ending doesn't mean it isn't present. That would be like saying going through a toll booth and paying the toll isn't a toll unless it automatically bankrupted the person.

Military training and police training with regard to killing and eliminating the enemy are two different things. Also, not all soldiers are cut out to be snipers from skill, physical and psychological perspectives. We shouldn't discount what all goes on in people's minds.

Here is a good book by Dave Grossman that discusses this issue in depth. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/ ... arcatslair" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I'm not going to argue what may have gone on in Chris Kyle's mind other than to say I suspect he had to deal with some psychological challenges as he went through training and executing his duties whether he discussed it or not in his book. What he did was noble and heroic in my mind.

I can say I've had to draw my weapon a couple of times over the years and if I would have had to take a life, tt would weigh on my mind for ever to some degree even if it was clear cut justifiable.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
Post Reply

Return to “The Crime Blotter”