Moby wrote:In a letter obtained by WAVY.com, school principal Matthew Delaney found that the "children were firing pellet guns at each other, and at people near the bus stop." Delaney states in the letter that one child "was only 10 feet from the bus stop, and ran from the shots being fired, but was still hit."
Typical twisting of the truth. The boys were shooting at other kids waiting for the bus. Non participants to the fun and games.
A little different than innocent playing in their own yard. they were shooting "outside" of their yard at others not playing with them.
You make a good point. But here are some other considerations:
- I would like to hear from the witnesses. The principal's information is 2nd hand (at least).
- I'm still concerned about the jurisdiction of the school in this matter. My follow up question is: where does it end?
I certainly don't condone the shooting of pellets at each other and especially not at non-participants. That is wrong and it needs to be dealt with - by the students parents (again, assuming the report is accurate). An arranged meeting among the students and parents who were involved and the principal should have been held and an action plan determined from there. At best, it should have been a mutually agreed approach and not a unilateral one from the principal. In addition, there are other levels of discipline possible including the suspension of bus riding privileges.
I could be absolutely wrong but I see these situations exactly in the same light as I do the ones where out of State people were punished for gun control infractions in places like D.C. and NJ. The goal is to "make an example.". If this hadn't involved guns, it would have been handled differently.
I'm very biased. I've had personal experience with school administrators acting on incorrect information and with malice. I do not assign divine qualities to anything that they say. They are humans just like the rest of us. I'm not sure that all of them believe that.
Edit - typo