escapedNJ wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:escapedNJ wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:"I don't object to you supporting any candidate, but I have a strong objection to absurd allegations that the NRA doesn't do anything for NJ. Had you not made such unfounded statements, I wouldn't have posted on this thread."
I didn't say NRA has done nothing for NJ.. I said they have done very little. So I acknowledge they do some work in NJ. Just not enough... So no allegations have been made!
Now that's a distinction without a difference. No matter how much money is spent on advertising, organizing, rallies and infomercials, the NJ electorate does not vote for pro-gun candidates. Only Laughtenberg's death got him out of the Senate! Everyone in the country knew his was rabidly anti-gun, so no resources needed to be spent telling people about his stance on Second Amendment Rights.
As you acknowledged in another post, the NRA is funding or participating in 14 lawsuits in NJ trying to use the courts to protect Second Amendment rights. No other state has that many suits ongoing. We are putting money into lawsuits because that holds more promise.
So yes, the NRA is doing as much for NJ has we can with the resources we have available to the states. Remember, the battle at the federal level is paramount as a loss there could make state laws irrelevant.
Chas.
The 14 lawsuits are great.. but no one found out until they were mad.... Then they compare the NRA to local organizations that are organizing rallies with hundreds of people... Again I didn't say the NRA didn't do anything (Which you said you wouldn't of comment don this article). As a dues paying member I have a right to my opinion and the NRA has to understand the peoples perception. It's not on the people to change the perception but the organization too. There are plenty of organizations to donate money too, as I am members of many and I donate EVERY PAYCHECK to the NRA Civil Defense FUND!
Again this for dues paying members to get exposure to people that they could vote for and this person has a podcast that they can say... Yes I like his points or No I don't like his points instead of just whats on a paper. I think everyone wants to make an informed decision on who they are voting for. Not just pull the lever with someone that has a recognizable name or is a celebrity.
I'm going to weigh in here.......and I understand why you're pulling for NJ's RKBA.......but if there are more NRA lawsuits in NJ than in any other state, and there are
other states at
least as onerous toward the RKBA as NJ is (California, Connecticut, New York, Massachusetts, Illinois, just to name 5 of them), and if NJ is therefore getting the lion's share of NRA litigation money, then aren't you kind of urging NRA to ignore other states which need the NRA's attention, litigation efforts, and funding just as badly as NJ does, so that NJ can hog an even larger share of those resources? There are 49 other states in the Union, at least a half dozen of which are in the same boat as NJ......not to mention the fact that even in
relatively gun-friendly states (like Texas), there's always some yahoo trying to squash gun rights, and
that costs money.
This NJ issue doesn't pass the sniff test to me, and I don't think NRA should waste any more money there than it already is wasting. As Charles pointed out, as long as NJ keeps electing closet nazis and mafia bosses, the RKBA is
always going to be under heavy attack; and there is simply going to be a point beyond which there is no ROI for the NRA in NJ. Don't believe me? Look to Illinois, and how long and at what cost and maneuvering did it take to finally get concealed carry passed there.....AFTER
McDonald.....and it is STILL nearly impossible for the average Joe to get a CHL. And look at how the Illinois governor interfered and tried to derail the court's ruling? Do you seriously think that Christie won't do the same if backed into a corner? It is wasted money in NJ, and I think the NRA should
only involve itself in NJ litigation in cases where it is a slam-dunk to win.
The only
reasonable choice for a NJ gun-owner who strongly and unapologetically supports the 2nd Amendment is to vote with your feet, get the heck out of there, and move to someplace that is more rational.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT