obamacare upheld

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

The Mad Moderate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:31 am
Location: Marble Falls

Re: obamacare upheld

#151

Post by The Mad Moderate »

I for the most part support the ACA, I do not like the mandate but see it as necessary given the mandates put on the insurance companies. I think that in the near term rates will go up in the long term I think the costs will go down and be even more affordable. I think in 70 years the ACA will be looked at in the same way the Social Security Act is viewed now. This is not the death of freedom.
American by birth Texan by the grace of God

Not to be a republican at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head.
-Francois Guisot
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 22
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: obamacare upheld

#152

Post by VMI77 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:Washington, Adams, and Jefferson........and even Lincoln......would be rolling in their graves. They were all about stewardship and the preservation of liberty for their descendents. Not so this bunch of political rape artists.
Slowplay wrote:For our francophone friends: L'enfer est plein de bonnes volontés et désirs
Translated for those who are not: "Hades is full of good intentions and desires."

If Romney does not get elected and then follow through on his promise to gut and/or repeal Obamacare, we are doomed.
Or put another way,"the road to Hades is paved with good intentions."
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 22
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: obamacare upheld

#153

Post by VMI77 »

The Mad Moderate wrote:I for the most part support the ACA, I do not like the mandate but see it as necessary given the mandates put on the insurance companies. I think that in the near term rates will go up in the long term I think the costs will go down and be even more affordable. I think in 70 years the ACA will be looked at in the same way the Social Security Act is viewed now. This is not the death of freedom.

Come on...Social Security? It's on it's last legs. I doubt if I'll see a dime even If I live long enough to qualify. The younger generation considers it a ripoff. They're not going to pay higher and higher taxes to support us old codgers. SS is on the road to collapse....20 years at the outside.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com

mamabearCali
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 2214
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:14 pm
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: obamacare upheld

#154

Post by mamabearCali »

The Mad Moderate wrote:I for the most part support the ACA, I do not like the mandate but see it as necessary given the mandates put on the insurance companies. I think that in the near term rates will go up in the long term I think the costs will go down and be even more affordable. I think in 70 years the ACA will be looked at in the same way the Social Security Act is viewed now. This is not the death of freedom.

Oh you mean that thing my husband and I are forced to contribute to but will never EVER see a penny of.....yeah that is just how I hope lifesaving treatment is handled here in the US. :banghead:
SAHM to four precious children. Wife to a loving husband.

"The women of this country learned long ago those without swords can still die upon them!" Eowyn in LOTR Two Towers
User avatar

The Mad Moderate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:31 am
Location: Marble Falls

Re: obamacare upheld

#155

Post by The Mad Moderate »

mamabearCali wrote:
The Mad Moderate wrote:I for the most part support the ACA, I do not like the mandate but see it as necessary given the mandates put on the insurance companies. I think that in the near term rates will go up in the long term I think the costs will go down and be even more affordable. I think in 70 years the ACA will be looked at in the same way the Social Security Act is viewed now. This is not the death of freedom.

Oh you mean that thing my husband and I are forced to contribute to but will never EVER see a penny of.....yeah that is just how I hope lifesaving treatment is handled here in the US. :banghead:
Could I borrow your time travel device, I would really like to know the lottery numbers for next week.
American by birth Texan by the grace of God

Not to be a republican at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head.
-Francois Guisot
User avatar

74novaman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 14
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: obamacare upheld

#156

Post by 74novaman »

The Mad Moderate wrote: I think in 70 years the ACA will be looked at in the same way the Social Security Act is viewed now.
So as an inefficient system that far exceeds its projected costs and underacheives its stated goals, that is used as tax revenue today by Congress instead of secured for tomorrow?

You're right...if it survives it will probably be viewed exactly as social security is!
TANSTAAFL

mamabearCali
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 2214
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:14 pm
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: obamacare upheld

#157

Post by mamabearCali »

My husband and I won't be 70 for another 40 years. You must have the crystal ball to be able to garauntee that we will still have SS in that day and age. Me...I am not counting on it.
SAHM to four precious children. Wife to a loving husband.

"The women of this country learned long ago those without swords can still die upon them!" Eowyn in LOTR Two Towers
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 22
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: obamacare upheld

#158

Post by VMI77 »

The Mad Moderate wrote:
mamabearCali wrote:
The Mad Moderate wrote:I for the most part support the ACA, I do not like the mandate but see it as necessary given the mandates put on the insurance companies. I think that in the near term rates will go up in the long term I think the costs will go down and be even more affordable. I think in 70 years the ACA will be looked at in the same way the Social Security Act is viewed now. This is not the death of freedom.

Oh you mean that thing my husband and I are forced to contribute to but will never EVER see a penny of.....yeah that is just how I hope lifesaving treatment is handled here in the US. :banghead:
Could I borrow your time travel device, I would really like to know the lottery numbers for next week.

Check it out...those dastardly Arabs invented something called numbers and they enable people to tell when the amount of one thing is greater than another thing, such as when KNOWN future obligations exceed any realistic hope of future revenues.

Edited to add:

"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."

Margaret Thatcher
Last edited by VMI77 on Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

The Mad Moderate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:31 am
Location: Marble Falls

Re: obamacare upheld

#159

Post by The Mad Moderate »

mamabearCali wrote:My husband and I won't be 70 for another 40 years. You must have the crystal ball to be able to garauntee that we will still have SS in that day and age. Me...I am not counting on it.
I never said it was a guarantee, there are NO guarantees in life. I am not counting on it either, I plan accordingly and have supplemental accounts for that reason.
American by birth Texan by the grace of God

Not to be a republican at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head.
-Francois Guisot

mamabearCali
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 2214
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:14 pm
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: obamacare upheld

#160

Post by mamabearCali »

So I should be happy that my husband and I are getting ripped off to the tune of several hundred dollars each month? So happy that I want this to expand into my healthcare costs. Quite honestly, if the premiums don't go up dramatically then services will have to decrease and my family will be forced into yet again paying for our services and the fair shares of many other people as we try to keep out family heathy despite govt interference.
SAHM to four precious children. Wife to a loving husband.

"The women of this country learned long ago those without swords can still die upon them!" Eowyn in LOTR Two Towers
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 22
Posts: 26853
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: obamacare upheld

#161

Post by The Annoyed Man »

The Mad Moderate wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
The Mad Moderate wrote:
steveincowtown wrote:
The Mad Moderate wrote:And here I though the people on the site were smart. I cannot believe so many "smart" people are still buying into the lies of the right wing media machine.
This may be a useless exercise, and please don't see this as an attack, but could you enumerate and explain what right wing media lies that the other posters have bought in to? You could even just do the top three.


Such as:

#1> Do you believe this is NOT a tax?

You can choose the rest...


PS...In the future when you choose to call a group stupid, I would double check grammar and spelling before hitting the old submit button. ;-)
1. Yes it is a Tax I cannot dispute that.
2. There is no rationing of care http://www.politifact.com/ohio/statemen ... -can-rati/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
3.It is NOT a government takeover of healthcare http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... nment-tak/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
4. You will not go to jail for not buying health insurance http://www.politifact.com/virginia/stat ... lth-care-/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
5. There are and never will be "Death panels" http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... ath-panel/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That part in red is bull. Collections of the punishment tax will be via the IRS. What if you refuse to pay it? If there is no jail, then they cannot enforce the fine.......same as for any other tax.
By taking your tax refund or garnishing your wages. Having worked for the IRS it is relatively rare to end up in jail for not paying taxes, it happens but not as often as one thinks. Also I believe there are provisions in the bill that forbid it. But what does it matter what I say as you see me and 54% of americans an your enemy. I guess I ought to go crawl in a hole and die now since I am so un-American. Although something about he who is without sin casting the first stone or not throwing stones if you live in a glass house comes to mind. I call you the enemy of liberty for supporting the president who passed the Patriot Act, which striped far more liberty from us than Obama could ever dream of.
So, last year, my business, after paying all of its expenses and making a small contribution to my income (the rest of which comes from burning through savings while we build a business) netted a profit of almost exactly $2,500 after taxes (I get no refund) and after paying for my own healthcare out of pocket. It took 4 years to net a profit. Now you want to garnish that to pay for yours and others' stupid healthcare? That's why I've worked my tail off for the last 4 years to try and build a business? How jacked up is your moral compass exactly? You and your kind are the killers of entrepreneurship and the American dream.

I've got nothing more to say to you. The good news is that Romney will wax Obama's tail in November. I just donated $200 to his campaign not 10 minutes ago—the first political donation I've made in years. And God willing, he'll repeal this abortion of a tax bill.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

powerboatr
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2276
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:53 pm
Location: North East Texas

Re: obamacare upheld

#162

Post by powerboatr »

74novaman wrote:
The Mad Moderate wrote: I think in 70 years the ACA will be looked at in the same way the Social Security Act is viewed now.
So as an inefficient system that far exceeds its projected costs and underacheives its stated goals, that is used as tax revenue today by Congress instead of secured for tomorrow?

You're right...if it survives it will probably be viewed exactly as social security is!

we all know to well what happens when congress gets their grips on tax revenue.............
that is what is crippling the social security program, congress takes and takes but never returns....
Proud to have served for over 22 Years in the U.S. Navy Certificated FAA A&P technician since 1996
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 22
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: obamacare upheld

#163

Post by VMI77 »

mamabearCali wrote:So I should be happy that my husband and I are getting ripped off to the tune of several hundred dollars each month? So happy that I want this to expand into my healthcare costs. Quite honestly, if the premiums don't go up dramatically then services will have to decrease and my family will be forced into yet again paying for our services and the fair shares of many other people as we try to keep out family heathy despite govt interference.
It occurs to me that perhaps the non-behavior tax you should worry about is a tax on not sending your children to public schools. Granted, you pay school taxes, but the school has to forgo Federal matching funds without your children in attendance. Is that fair? --you're taking money right out of the school's pocket (using liberal logic here...the same kind that seems to hold that the government isn't taking your property when it withholds your tax refund).
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 11453
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: obamacare upheld

#164

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

:totap:
Last edited by 03Lightningrocks on Thu Jun 28, 2012 7:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 22
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: obamacare upheld

#165

Post by VMI77 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:So, last year, my business, after paying all of its expenses and making a small contribution to my income (the rest of which comes from burning through savings while we build a business) netted a profit of almost exactly $2,500 after taxes (I get no refund) and after paying for my own healthcare out of pocket. It took 4 years to net a profit. Now you want to garnish that to pay for yours and others' stupid healthcare? That's why I've worked my tail off for the last 4 years to try and build a business? How jacked up is your moral compass exactly? You and your kind are the killers of entrepreneurship and the American dream.
.
One thing liberals don't seem to understand is that once they've penalized responsibility and good decisions enough a lot of people are going to come to the conclusion that bad decisions and irresponsibility make more sense.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”