![Hurry :hurry:](./images/smilies/hurray.gif)
![woohoo :woohoo](./images/smilies/woohoo.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Doh!Pawpaw wrote:Very carefully, re-read what I wrote. "99% of them give all the rest (in other words 1%) a bad name."Scott in Houston wrote:Call me jaded, but the percentage has got to be WAY higher than that, when it comes to government employees. I would guess that it is the other way around, 99% give 1% a bad name.Pawpaw wrote:Government employees are like lawyers... 99% of them give all the rest a bad name.
Don't forget "The Annoying Man".
Well, I hope you'll concede the possibility that both my wife and I are in the 1%.Scott in Houston wrote:Doh!Pawpaw wrote:Very carefully, re-read what I wrote. "99% of them give all the rest (in other words 1%) a bad name."Scott in Houston wrote:Call me jaded, but the percentage has got to be WAY higher than that, when it comes to government employees. I would guess that it is the other way around, 99% give 1% a bad name.Pawpaw wrote:Government employees are like lawyers... 99% of them give all the rest a bad name.
My bad.
The fact that you're on this forum already proves it.jmorris wrote:Well, I hope you'll concede the possibility that both my wife and I are in the 1%.Scott in Houston wrote:Doh!Pawpaw wrote:Very carefully, re-read what I wrote. "99% of them give all the rest (in other words 1%) a bad name."Scott in Houston wrote:Call me jaded, but the percentage has got to be WAY higher than that, when it comes to government employees. I would guess that it is the other way around, 99% give 1% a bad name.Pawpaw wrote:Government employees are like lawyers... 99% of them give all the rest a bad name.
My bad.