data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b3ec/6b3ec18e344cf446f9a5f5e17bdd137b9eb7d5ba" alt="Confused :???:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fafb0/fafb0b3369e6bb89675ca93362ceef0b02eb5bd7" alt="I Agree :iagree:"
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
sjfcontrol wrote:jmra wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:apostate wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
JSThane wrote:sjfcontrol wrote:jmra wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:apostate wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Gentlemen, we need to get back on track and answer the OP. . . . . .Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.
If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.
I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.
Why do this?
Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.
Rant off.
The Annoyed Man wrote:Gentlemen, we need to get back on track and answer the OP. . . . . .Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.
If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.
I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.
Why do this?
Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.
Rant off.
. . . . .like this. . . . .
Yep03Lightningrocks wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:Gentlemen, we need to get back on track and answer the OP. . . . . .Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.
If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.
I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.
Why do this?
Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.
Rant off.
. . . . .like this. . . . .
Some threads are like train wrecks. You don't want to look, but you just can't help yourself...jmra wrote:Yep03Lightningrocks wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:Gentlemen, we need to get back on track and answer the OP. . . . . .Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.
If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.
I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.
Why do this?
Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.
Rant off.
. . . . .like this. . . . .
sjfcontrol wrote:Some threads are like train wrecks. You don't want to look, but you just can't help yourself...jmra wrote:Yep03Lightningrocks wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:Gentlemen, we need to get back on track and answer the OP. . . . . .Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.
If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.
I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.
Why do this?
Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.
Rant off.
. . . . .like this. . . . .
fishman wrote:In, andWait a minute, what am I agreeing to?
Ok like this?sjfcontrol wrote:fishman wrote:In, andWait a minute, what am I agreeing to?
You should'a quoted it…
Yepfishman wrote:Ok like this?sjfcontrol wrote:fishman wrote:In, andWait a minute, what am I agreeing to?
You should'a quoted it…
That would be it.jmra wrote:Yepfishman wrote:Ok like this?sjfcontrol wrote:fishman wrote:In, andWait a minute, what am I agreeing to?
You should'a quoted it…