The original statement I responded to was "One does NOT lower the hammer on a revolver with a loaded chamber. " Given that situations change unexpectedly, especially with respect to range safety, and no one in their right mind is going to stuff a cocked revolver into a rug and toss it in the trunk to drive to a better location to fire it off, there is sometimes a need to lower the hammer on a loaded chamber. I do it fairly often with single action and double action revolvers used in single action mode for accuracy, for reasons as small as the wind blowing my target off the backer.G.C.Montgomery wrote:KD5NRH, TXI’s statement, “There is no need to cock a modern double action revolver,� is correct within the context of this discussion.
So is stuffing mags, but how many people admit to carrying an extra box of defensive ammo in the car just in case they have that time? Heck, I doubt I'll ever need the shotgun in the trunk, and doubt even more that I'll have time to get it if I do, but it's still there because I don't want my last words to be "if only I'd had a shotgun in the trunk."Now from the perspective of a defensive shooter, soldier or police officer, taking the time to cock the hammer is time you don’t have.
I can shoot DA pretty well, and it accounts for 90% or more of my practice with revolvers, but I can't get the sort of accuracy I can get SA; if I happen to have that extra split-second when pinpoint accuracy could make the difference, I don't want to be the one telling the victim's family, "Sorry, I could've had a decent shot at the shooter, but I don't practice firing my weapon in its most accurate mode." or worse, "I'm really sorry I shot your kid when he was getting away from the psycho, but I thought I could make that shot without hitting him." Unlikely? Sure, but it's pretty darn unlikely that I'll ever be attacked by three guys who square off in perfect IDPA-target form at an exact ten-yard distance from me too, but I practice that scenario, why not every one I can possibly set up on the range with the materials at hand?
Actually, neither quote appeared to be within the context of defensive shooting; this thread started about an administrative procedure, (decocking the 1911 after loading as prep for carry - I seriously doubt the OP was planning to decock after a reload under fire and wait until he had a shot to cock it) which is also what I would consider lowering the hammer of a drop-safe revolver to be.The fact that S&W. Colt, Taurus and others still tout the single-action triggers on their modern DA revolvers is irrelevant within the context of TXI’s statement and the discussion of modern revolvers for defensive shooting.
I'm pretty sure I acknowledged that when I brought it up.Oh, and the Blackhawk revolver is not a modern design.
And in the context of a blanket statement like "One does NOT lower the hammer on a revolver with a loaded chamber," there is nothing to exclude those people who would clearly have a need from time to time. Also, "There is no need to cock a modern double action revolver,� doesn't appear to exclude the folks who hunt or shoot silhouettes with Pythons, 460XVRs and other modern DA revolvers in SA mode. For that matter, the best feature of a DA for hunters, the ability to take a carefully aimed SA shot at a target that is unaware of your presence, and followup if need be with quick DA shots could be useful in a third-party defensive situation as well. (for that matter, I can think of a scenario or two where it might be useful in self defense too, but if we're going there, let's move it to another thread)Single-action revolvers like the Blackhawk are primarily marketed to collectors/enthusiasts, grown men who still like to play “Cowboys and Indians,� as well as hunters who believe the single-action frame is inherently stronger than that found in a double-action revolver for use with larger cartridges such as 454Casull.