WFAA gun discussions this week
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
- Location: North Texas
Re: WFAA gun discussions this week
They used the Aurora shooter as their example for requiring background checks for body armor. The shooter that passed background checks.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: WFAA gun discussions this week
You're not kidding! They why so many of us said we'd rather die quickly from a bullet than slowly cook to death.VMI77 wrote:None of it is pleasant to wear in Texas heat.RPBrown wrote:Most of the body armor they were talking about was Class 4. I don't have an issue with someone obtaining class 4 armor but that stuff is heavy and bulky. If I were to own any, it would be a class 2 or 3 I think.
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:52 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Re: WFAA gun discussions this week
From last night. . . after detailing that the law prevents BATFE from maintaining a database to reconcile gun serial numbers to purchasers and detailing that they have to go to the manufacturer, then to the wholeseller, then to the distributor, then to the FFL / storefront, then to the original purchaser in order to determine ownership. . .
BATFE Agent: Last year we did over 300,000 serial number lookups for criminal investigations.
Reporter: And you had to do all of those manually?
BATFE Agent: Yes
Me (from couch): You're darn right!
. . . I couldn't even muster a crocodile tear.
BATFE Agent: Last year we did over 300,000 serial number lookups for criminal investigations.
Reporter: And you had to do all of those manually?
BATFE Agent: Yes
Me (from couch): You're darn right!
. . . I couldn't even muster a crocodile tear.
Native Texian
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 6096
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
- Location: Victoria, Texas
Re: WFAA gun discussions this week
And what they're not telling you is how many paid off....I suspect not many.fickman wrote:From last night. . . after detailing that the law prevents BATFE from maintaining a database to reconcile gun serial numbers to purchasers and detailing that they have to go to the manufacturer, then to the wholeseller, then to the distributor, then to the FFL / storefront, then to the original purchaser in order to determine ownership. . .
BATFE Agent: Last year we did over 300,000 serial number lookups for criminal investigations.
Reporter: And you had to do all of those manually?
BATFE Agent: Yes
Me (from couch): You're darn right!
. . . I couldn't even muster a crocodile tear.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 9
- Posts: 9044
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
- Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)
Re: WFAA gun discussions this week
And some thought negative of me for indicating I detected a bit of agenda. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/853b9/853b9311dc7da32d4adef3f41bbb19f56604b471" alt="Smile5 :smilelol5:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/853b9/853b9311dc7da32d4adef3f41bbb19f56604b471" alt="Smile5 :smilelol5:"
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 6745
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
- Location: Hunt County
Re: WFAA gun discussions this week
Relax mojo... That's not the reason we think negative of you.
I still feel the first two episodes were remarkably balanced. Much better than the similar attempt a while back where the BG made it a point to shoot the GG first, every time.
I suppose it was just too much to hope that an ABC affiliate would maintain that balanced approach.
FWIW, You can see all of the episodes here: http://www.wfaa.com/search/Ready.%20Aim.%20Truth/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5627e/5627e958e8e7d87d2738092c74415280125fc58a" alt="Wink ;-)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/967ee/967ee870d1f8a76f4e1d67e277897d480551760e" alt="rlol "rlol""
I still feel the first two episodes were remarkably balanced. Much better than the similar attempt a while back where the BG made it a point to shoot the GG first, every time.
I suppose it was just too much to hope that an ABC affiliate would maintain that balanced approach.
FWIW, You can see all of the episodes here: http://www.wfaa.com/search/Ready.%20Aim.%20Truth/
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
Re: WFAA gun discussions this week
Pawpaw wrote:Relax mojo... That's not the reason we think negative of you.![]()
![]()
I still feel the first two episodes were remarkably balanced. Much better than the similar attempt a while back where the BG made it a point to shoot the GG first, every time.
I suppose it was just too much to hope that an ABC affiliate would maintain that balanced approach.
FWIW, You can see all of the episodes here: http://www.wfaa.com/search/Ready.%20Aim.%20Truth/
to be fair i think much of the slant of the story is due to the reporter covering the section, brett shipp is a good reporter and his two segments appeared very balanced....then they went on to different reporters that seemed to twist it a little more
Re: WFAA gun discussions this week
it would be more balanced if when the reporter discussed short barrel and full auto that they mention the length someone has to go through to get one and that the batfe has all their information PLUS a tax on the item.
You cant just walk out and buy a "machine gun" its very expensive and its registered.
You cant just walk out and buy a "machine gun" its very expensive and its registered.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 9
- Posts: 9044
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
- Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)
Re: WFAA gun discussions this week
Ouch! My sensitivities are injured. :)Pawpaw wrote:Relax mojo... That's not the reason we think negative of you.![]()
![]()
I still feel the first two episodes were remarkably balanced. Much better than the similar attempt a while back where the BG made it a point to shoot the GG first, every time.
I suppose it was just too much to hope that an ABC affiliate would maintain that balanced approach.
FWIW, You can see all of the episodes here: http://www.wfaa.com/search/Ready.%20Aim.%20Truth/
I agree about the first two episodes. It sounds like it took a deep dive on the third one. I haven't seen it yet. Will use your link and check them out.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
- Location: North Texas
Re: WFAA gun discussions this week
Wow. First two -- great. Balanced. The segment on safes wasn't bad either. Second two? I could barely get through. I didn't see the 5th one in that list of videos. Not too upset I'm missing it either.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14