Search found 9 matches
- Thu May 27, 2021 3:54 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: HB 1927 (Unlicensed Carry) Signs
- Replies: 10
- Views: 18998
Re: HB 1927 (Unlicensed Carry) Signs
That is current law, not what will be in effect on September 1 when HB 1927 takes effect.
It is both current law and what will be in effect in September; HB 1927 makes no changes to the definition of "notice" contained in 30.05(b), but merely adds in 30.05(c) another way of providing "notice ...
- Thu May 27, 2021 3:09 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: HB 1927 (Unlicensed Carry) Signs
- Replies: 10
- Views: 18998
Re: HB 1927 (Unlicensed Carry) Signs
The verbiage and signage requirements added in Section 30.05(c) are not required in order to prohibit unlicensed carry of firearms; a simple "No Firearms Allowed" sign will suffice.
"Notice" under Section 30.05 can be as simple as "written communication" (with no further requirements; see 30.05(b ...
"Notice" under Section 30.05 can be as simple as "written communication" (with no further requirements; see 30.05(b ...
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 1:00 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: TX: 87R 2021 Session SB540 Con Carry
- Replies: 13
- Views: 21865
Re: TX: 87R 2021 Session SB540 Con Carry
This bill is a bit of a mess.
First, it adds language to 46.02 so that the current restrictions on unlicensed handgun carry apply only to people under twenty-one years of age, and open carry is only allowed in the same manner as for license holders.
However, it also amends 46.15(k) so that 46.02 ...
First, it adds language to 46.02 so that the current restrictions on unlicensed handgun carry apply only to people under twenty-one years of age, and open carry is only allowed in the same manner as for license holders.
However, it also amends 46.15(k) so that 46.02 ...
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 12:01 pm
- Forum: Closed Items
- Topic: Ammo trade (Want .22LR) have .223, 9mm, .45, and .308
- Replies: 12
- Views: 6150
Re: Ammo trade (Want .22LR) have .223, 9mm, .45, and .308
I've got some surplus .22 ammunition that I'd be happy to trade for 9mm, but I live in Houston.
- Tue Jul 16, 2019 12:12 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal
- Replies: 42
- Views: 60638
Re: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal
According to the filing (https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2 ... -FILED.pdf), the plaintiffs have standing as the heirs of one of the victims.K.Mooneyham wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 11:08 am
New question: what gives the plaintiff(s) standing to bring that lawsuit?
- Tue Jul 16, 2019 11:00 am
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal
- Replies: 42
- Views: 60638
Re: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal
It appears to be a federal district court, as the case has been assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon.K.Mooneyham wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2019 10:46 am Okay, I'll ask a completely simple question because the name of the court confuses me. Is the lawsuit filed in a NEVADA STATE COURT or A FEDERAL COURT?
- Mon May 20, 2019 10:18 am
- Forum: 2019 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: Post Mortem
- Replies: 19
- Views: 16761
Re: Post Mortem
If I understand the legislative schedule correctly, multiple bills which would benefit gun owners still have a chance at final passage or have already been sent to the governor, in addition to HB 302:
HB 121 provides that immediate departure from signed property upon oral 30.06/30.07 notice is a ...
HB 121 provides that immediate departure from signed property upon oral 30.06/30.07 notice is a ...
- Fri May 17, 2019 4:14 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: HB 2949 - Expedited Special License for Certain At-Risk Persons
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7935
Re: HB 2949 - Expedited Special License for Certain At-Risk Persons
This bill is dead, but SB 1691 is still alive and has a similar (albeit more limited) impact; it provides that if an applicant is protected by a protective order, DPS must either issue a license or give notification of denial "as soon as practicable," and the applicable license fee (original ...
- Sun Feb 10, 2019 12:24 am
- Forum: 2019 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 1165 - Smaller 30.06/07 Signs
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2819
Re: HB 1165 - Smaller 30.06/07 Signs
To clarify, this bill adds the pictogram and abridged text as an alternative to the current statutorily-required text, rather than as an additional requirement.