TexasCHLforum.com

if you and others can get past your doomsday outlook and instead choose to be a part of efforts to regain recognition of the RIGHT to keep and bear arms.
This proves you don't have a clue. Charles and others have been fighting for our rights for decades. Guess who got you open carry?

Not all ...

if you and others can get past your doomsday outlook and instead choose to be a part of efforts to regain recognition of the RIGHT to keep and bear arms.
This proves you don't have a clue. Charles and others have been fighting for our rights for decades. Guess who got you open carry?

Not all ...

Evidently the Houston Zoo is not an amusement park: http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Houston-Zoo-forced-to-remove-no-guns-sign-by-6503473.php

"Houston Zoo forced to remove 'no guns' sign by city

At the behest of the City of Houston which was prompted by a prominent Texas gun ...

And again, clearly they did say that they were interested in the legal challenge to the Dallas zoo...
Is there a current legal challenge against the Dallas Zoo? If there is, I'd love to get a copy of it.

If not, via the link you provided, upon re-reading it I now have my answer as to "(in TX ...

Also see the following where Mr. Cotton has spent considerable efforts to put together a process for reporting:
http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=79315
That's interesting but unfortunately not applicable to Missouri law - which has no such avenue for someone like myself to pursue. :sad ...

If I read it correctly I think you may have it backwards . He said that he had an interest IN the Texas activities, specifically Dallas Zoo, but could offer pro bono assistance with regard to your situation.
(my bold above)

Thank you, but no, I read it accurately.
Here's his post:
"Previously ...

Also see the following where Mr. Cotton has spent considerable efforts to put together a process for reporting:
http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=79315
That's interesting but unfortunately not applicable to Missouri law - which has no such avenue for someone like myself to pursue. :sad:

Glockster wrote:If I read it correctly I think you may have it backwards. He said that he had an interest IN the Texas activities, specifically Dallas Zoo, but could offer pro bono assistance with regard to your situation.

(my bold above)

Thank you, but no, I read it accurately.

I currently have a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against me because of a filing by the St. Louis Zoo, because of my stated intention to carry a sidearm into the Zoo.

You can read more about it here: http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/showthread.php?130241-St-Louis-Zoo-communication-log-TRO ...

I currently have a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against me because of a filing by the St. Louis Zoo, because of my stated intention to carry a sidearm into the Zoo.

You can read more about it here: http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/showthread.php?130241-St-Louis-Zoo-communication-log-TRO ...

I currently have a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against me because of a filing by the St. Louis Zoo, because of my stated intention to carry a sidearm into the Zoo.

You can read more about it here: http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/showthread.php?130241-St-Louis-Zoo-communication-log-TRO ...