TexasCHLforum.com

I really appreciate all of your thoughts, guys! Keep up the good work! Is there something besides the VM2 that might work well? (No need for more +1's on THAT particular holster. Once I try it this wkend, I'll know more).

I'm hopin' that a lady will pop in and give me some input. Didn't want to double post.

longtooth wrote:56 yr old male type frame. 5'10" 190 lb. I have a Sparks VM2 & conceal a full size Springfield or Kimber Pro. Really like it as does Charles. If you have a relatively straight body build (whether petite or fluffy) I think it would work well for ladies too. If you are slim wasted & full hips it would probably dig into your side.
You will like the K. Some 3" are a little particular about ammo though.

Son has the VM2 so I'll try it this wkend when I try the pistol. We'll soon know. My Comp-tac pulls the full size in really close (which works well) so it's a good match. I've gotten my curves back, however, so I fear that some "trial and error" may be ahead.

Thanks for the heads up on the 3" and ammo.

gigag04 wrote:I conceal a UC 2 OWB alot. It's pretty easy...and thats with a wilson combat mag sticking out.

Do you have a particular OWB that you like for the UC 2? If I go that way, it'd probably be Comp-Tac...but that's not set in stone.

Need some advice here. I'm considerin' gettin' either the Kimber Ultra Carry OR the CDP. Think that the 3" barrel combined with a slightly shorter grip might make the 1911 more concealable than my S&W 1911Sc.

If greater concealability is my objective on this 59 year old female-type body, which holster do you think might give me the most comfort combined with great concealability?

Since I haven't shot my son's yet, we both predict that I'll like it. SOOO...

Thanks, in advance, for your thoughts on the subject! Please feel free to include a link to the holster that you're recommending. That would be most appreciated, too!