TexasCHLforum.com

jmra wrote:Can they do the 26 names on a sheet of paper like they did the other night?

I believe that rule was for limiting new AMENDMENTS to those that were on the Speaker's desk.

I think the only way to debate now is on the motion to(or not to) concur.

Charles L. Cotton wrote: I wanted the House to concur, but a vote not to concur was not a vote against HB910.

Chas.

Point taken.

I get that things are done a certain way, but it is hard to stomach when the face value is screaming otherwise. Here's to 11th hour recall and concurrence shenanigans

I do not have time to read 79 pages of message thread, and I do not know what votes were taken nor the significance of a yeah or nay for each vote.

Can someone please help me with any votes associated with Rep. Patricia Harless on SB11 and HB910? I'd like to know if she supported the right votes ...

The bold ones are those who switched direction on what is virtually the same language

Yea votes for hb910 with Dutton amendment 4/20


Yeas — Anderson, C .; Anderson, R.; Ashby; Aycock ; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, D.; Bonnen, G.; Burkett ; Burns; Burrows; Button; Capriglione; Clardy; Cook;
Craddick ...

he did. 6 passed and then they moved to vote to send it to 3rd reading and someone started yelling at the last split second.

move to passage and then "WHOAH WHOAH WHOAH!!!!" from the back. (for those not watching)

back on

From Rep. Dutton's earlier Parliamentary Inquiries, he has one more POO he is waiting to present "at the appropriate time" regarding the 36 hour rule and the moving of the SB11 from one calendar to another calendar. I think its safe to say between amendments and POO, there will be no vote before ...

Now M.F. wants to cry about language in the bill analysis. It shouldn't have any bearing if you can read the bill and vote on it.

Text of Amendment 1

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/84 ... 011H21.PDF" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

can a vote table amendments as in the senate?

He just said he was going to postpone 9!

The MDA "people" (and that's the best I can say after trying to have a cordial discussion with them) are still in their seats. At least they are wasting their evening as well.

Since they're so interested in this bill, why not slide in SB11 in as an amendment...

Not germane (among a bunch of reasons)

I understand that.

SB11 is essentially dead. Strauss isn't going to allow a vote on it.

Does everyone agree? Is there ANY life left in SB11

I'm holding my opinion ...

cprems wrote:Since they're so interested in this bill, why not slide in SB11 in as an amendment...

Not germane (among a bunch of reasons)