We can expect to see many other such incursions into our daily language. The ironic part is that the child would understand that much better than "long side down."
RPB wrote:Speaking of Newfangled Technology
I got this catalog in the mail
it has this ENERGY SAVING alarm clock
no electricity needed, but I didn't see the Energy Star Rating
no batteries are needed; NOT EVEN the rechargeable ones
It doesn't even use up the sun's solar power;
I'm glad, I was worried we might run out if everyone uses it
it has a crank knob on the back; you just wind it up
it even has an alarm you can wind up
I checked the schematics, it uses a "Mainspring"
what will they think of next?
I bet Obama might invest billions of tax dollars in this innovative company with this "new" "Green" technology.
[
Image ]
It has a major shortcoming in that you cannot set the alarm for more than 12 hours away.
I have attended many seminars over the years where the presenter warms up the crowd with a ten question test with answers that are "unanticipated" to encourage people to think outside the box or to demonstrate paradigm shifts. A lot of the answers feel like "gotchas" as you go through the test.
One of the questions that pops up over and over is also one that I use to gotcha the presenter back: "The year is 1955, it is about 8pm and you are very tired but you must be up at 9am the next day. You go to bed, setting your alarm for 9, how long will you be able to sleep before the alarm goes off?"
Of course most people used to today's technology will answer 13 hours, but the answer he is looking for is 1 hour because, according to him, the clock is a 12 hour clock and can only be set within the nearest 12 hours. The presenter is usually of the impression that there were only 12 hour clocks available in 1955.
The funny thing to me is that in 1955, for real, I actually had a 24 hour clock. I had had ham radio forced on my by my father, and I already thought in 24 hour time, and always have since. My alarm clock was a radio station "digital" clock that if you set it for 0900 at 2000 gave you a chance to rest 13 hours.
The presenter usually gets all puffed up at this point and tells me I am missing the whole point of the exercise, etc, etc, etc, at which point I tell him that if the exercise is poorly designed, then it's not getting the point across anyway.
-------------------
Anyway, I always wear my watch set for 24 hour time, and these days kids understand it when they look at it.