TexasCHLforum.com

And now the "tiara" amendment.

And a person who has "been convicted" (he doesn't say of what) is not eligible to have a license for five years, can then apply for and obtain a license in another state which would allow them to carry in TX, establishing a "loophole."

Seems to me that getting a license in another state would be predicated on not having inappropriate convictions.

Here comes the CHL badge amendment!

How do the LEOs detect that the license is valid?

"Holster with a built in slot"

Rodriguez is throwing with both hands, isn't he?

Thus far....fairly uneventful, the amendments that is. And just how many did Rodriguez author??? Groan, time for the printable sign amendment.

30.06.com is a "predatory group".

"Less Onerous" signs.

Doesn't change the "location requirements," WHAT LOCATION REQUIREMENTS??

And now 30.06.com is "predatory."

I'm so disappointed that nobody else has posted this:

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=TFwprS_L6tg[/youtube]

Seems to me that the Secretary is running through the votes faster and faster each time since she, and everyone else, already knows what the score is going to be... 20-11.

CoffeeNut wrote:

txglock21 wrote:

CoffeeNut wrote:Out of curiosity if these pass and the Governor signs how quickly can/will they take effect?

September 1, 2015...(if I'm not mistaken).

Thanks!

An amendment was added to push the date back. I believe it would now be 1/1/16.

You notice that all of these anti-gun folks have CHLs for themselves?

It's OK for me, but not for thee.

AJSully421 wrote:Seems to me that the Secretary is running through the votes faster and faster each time since she, and everyone else, already knows what the score is going to be... 20-11.

Noted, she almost did the whole roll without taking a breath.

AJSully421 wrote:You notice that all of these anti-gun folks have CHLs for themselves?

It's OK for me, but not for thee.

Has Estes been asking each Senator that during the debate?