Page 9 of 32
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:56 pm
by AJSully421
RHenriksen wrote:AJSully421 wrote:You notice that all of these anti-gun folks have CHLs for themselves?
It's OK for me, but not for thee.
Has Estes been asking each Senator that during the debate?
No, he is not asking... that would take balls. There have been several folks who have volunteered that info while they are openly opposing OC.
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:57 pm
by Ruark
What exactly does it mean to "table" the amendment? Vote on it later (which delays things)?
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:57 pm
by gregsauls
Too many folks fleeing the north and far west.... We can't indoctrinate them fast enough in the ways of Texas. Our position is being overrun. But we will hold ground.
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:58 pm
by TVGuy
Ruark wrote:What exactly does it mean to "table" the amendment? Vote on it later (which delays things)?
It's not part of the bill.
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:59 pm
by BigGuy
Very few CHL holders commit ADDITIONAL crimes???
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:00 pm
by ScooterSissy
I'm hearing the claim that "someone will grab that gun" (if it's not concealed) .
I wonder, does anyone know what the stats are on open carry weapons being grabbed by others in open carry states?
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:01 pm
by CJD
Ruark wrote:What exactly does it mean to "table" the amendment? Vote on it later (which delays things)?
It means it does not even get a vote. Basically voted "no" without even going to an actual vote.
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:01 pm
by locke_n_load
BigGuy wrote:Very few CHL holders commit ADDITIONAL crimes???
Was thinking that myself.
Apparently your rights end at the capitol property.
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:02 pm
by TVGuy
Video cut off at 5pm. Huh?
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:03 pm
by AJSully421
TVGuy wrote:Video cut off at 5pm. Huh?
Seems like it.
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:03 pm
by jerry_r60
It sounds like the no campus OC amendment might pass. If so, then if I heard the amendment to the amendment correct, it is better. Since the amendment says partially or completely open would be banned, I like the, "knowingly or intentionally" language to help protect the unintentional display.
I'd prefer no amendment but if it's going to pass, this does look like an improvement.
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:04 pm
by AJSully421
jerry_r60 wrote:It sounds like the no campus OC amendment might pass. If so, then if I heard the amendment to the amendment correct, it is better. Since the amendment says partially or completely open would be banned, I like the, "knowingly or intentionally" language to help protect the unintentional display.
I'd prefer no amendment but if it's going to pass, this does look like an improvement.
Agreed. If that is their intent... I will take it to get OC passed.
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:04 pm
by Charles L. Cotton
Sen. Whitmire has always been an arrogant ass, but he has voted with gun owners most of the time. Now he thinks he's so important that the law needs to be changed for his benefit.
The video feed just went dead in the middle of Whitmire's condescending rant on the floor of the Senate. This garbage!!!
Chas.
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:04 pm
by Pawpaw
AJSully421 wrote:TVGuy wrote:Video cut off at 5pm. Huh?
Seems like it.
Mine died too.
It's back up now.
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:05 pm
by jimlongley
Just as his rant was heading toward strident.
I was starting to think that maybe he had himself in mind.