The Annoyed Man wrote:FOR THE WIN!!!anygunanywhere wrote:As long as no one is offended and everyone gets a trophy everything will be fine.
anygunanywhere for president of the universe.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
The Annoyed Man wrote:FOR THE WIN!!!anygunanywhere wrote:As long as no one is offended and everyone gets a trophy everything will be fine.
anygunanywhere for president of the universe.
Breny414 wrote:
Obviously by joining this board I, too, support the 2nd Amendment.
What's OCT?Abraham wrote:Breny414,
C'mon, admit it, you're from "Moms Demand Action" aren't you?
The one think I'm certain of is you aren't from OCT...
He didnt know what he was talking about. This dog did it quite well...VMI77 wrote: The "this really exceptional woman" could do it line reminds me of a famous quote of Johnson's about women preaching:
"Sir, a woman's preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all."
from Boswell's Life of Johnson
Abraham,Abraham wrote:Breny414,
Leftists are few and far between on this board.
Given your penchant for leftist sloganeering, what do you hope to accomplish coming here?
Few accept your professed bona fides as a pro gun person.
What's your agenda coming here?
If you really care to learn more about shooting, guns and accessories, CHL questions, etc., you must appreciate those with these honest inquires are welcomed.
You however, seem to be a rather obvious contrivance.
Please, demonstrate I'm wrong.
What are you doing?Abraham wrote:Breny414,
Leftists are few and far between on this board.
Given your penchant for leftist sloganeering, what do you hope to accomplish coming here?
Few accept your professed bona fides as a pro gun person.
What's your agenda coming here?
If you really care to learn more about shooting, guns and accessories, CHL questions, etc., you must appreciate those with these honest inquires are welcomed.
You however, seem to be a rather obvious contrivance.
Please, demonstrate I'm wrong.
Breny414 wrote:Abraham,Abraham wrote:Breny414,
Leftists are few and far between on this board.
Given your penchant for leftist sloganeering, what do you hope to accomplish coming here?
Few accept your professed bona fides as a pro gun person.
What's your agenda coming here?
If you really care to learn more about shooting, guns and accessories, CHL questions, etc., you must appreciate those with these honest inquires are welcomed.
You however, seem to be a rather obvious contrivance.
Please, demonstrate I'm wrong.
my views on the women in the military and the 2nd amendment cause are mutually exclusive. One has nothing to do with the other. admittedly, they tend to usually break out along the same political lines for many folks, which to too bad.
My agenda for coming here is that I'm getting my CHL and stumbled across this site via the "waiting room." A Google search for "how long to get CHL" brought me here. So I joined.
I've been open and honest about my point of view, would you have it any other way? Should I be quiet and not contribute?
I don't think any of my posts have been contrived. I didn't initiate this discussion or contrive in any way to bring it up. There were several posts and counter posts that occurred before I gave an opinion.
I guess the phrase "free your mind" is leftist drivel of anti gunners... I will not use it again.
Regards,
Manually carrying an 8 inch round from one battery to another is hyperbole. The manual calls for two-man lift on that round. However, as the Fire Direction Officer of an M109A1 battery, I routinely had the gun section chiefs cross level projectile types across the battery. This could cause soldiers to pick up the roughly 90-100 pound projectiles and carry them 250 yards from one end of the battery to the other. Some would carry two, most would carry one. Current tactics are very different.MeMelYup wrote:That may be, but can they hump a 204 lb of HE round a hundred yards from battery 1 to battery 4 during a fire for effect? Been there and it is no fun. Especially with a center battery running low because they are firing the ranging rounds and need to borrow from other guns while the ammo people are getting another load of ammo.Breny414 wrote:Jago668, I understand the point. I do believe there is an ample supply of women who can... just a belief. whether or not recruiters ("your recruiter lied to you, son") will make sure the individual is qualified is another matter.
FWIW, I wasn't in infantry and I didn't want anything to do with infantry. when I got my orders and they said 3rd Infantry Division I was pretty bummed because I didn't know any better. Wound up in an artillery battalion. And I have no doubt that women can do that... cut the powder, pull the lanyard, etc, etc.