Re: ANTHONY KENNEDY IS RETIRING!
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:31 pm
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Unfortunately, I don't know enough about any lf the candidates to have a strong opinion other than being thankful Trump is the one doing the appointments and not Hillary.jason812 wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:28 pmI am cause I would have preferred Barrett but only time will tell how he pans out. At least it's not Hillary nominating a justice, you know what you would have gotten with her.mojo84 wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:23 pmI guess you are pretty disappointed.RoyGBiv wrote: Tue Jul 03, 2018 1:34 pm Re: Kavanaugh...
He's a non-starter for me...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/32411/ru ... en-shapiroKavanaugh upheld Obamacare in Sissel v. Department of Health and Human Services as well as in Seven-Sky v. Holder, in which he stated that the Obamacare penalties were actually “taxes.”
mojo84 wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:50 pmUnfortunately, I don't know enough about any lf the candidates to have a strong opinion other than being thankful Trump is the one doing the appointments and not Hillary.jason812 wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:28 pmI am cause I would have preferred Barrett but only time will tell how he pans out. At least it's not Hillary nominating a justice, you know what you would have gotten with her.mojo84 wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:23 pmI guess you are pretty disappointed.RoyGBiv wrote: Tue Jul 03, 2018 1:34 pm Re: Kavanaugh...
He's a non-starter for me...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/32411/ru ... en-shapiroKavanaugh upheld Obamacare in Sissel v. Department of Health and Human Services as well as in Seven-Sky v. Holder, in which he stated that the Obamacare penalties were actually “taxes.”
There's that plus, ain't none of 'em got the job yet; e.g., Pocahontas Warren has already publicly denounced Kavanaugh.03Lightningrocks wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:52 pmmojo84 wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:50 pmUnfortunately, I don't know enough about any lf the candidates to have a strong opinion other than being thankful Trump is the one doing the appointments and not Hillary.jason812 wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:28 pmI am cause I would have preferred Barrett but only time will tell how he pans out. At least it's not Hillary nominating a justice, you know what you would have gotten with her.mojo84 wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:23 pmI guess you are pretty disappointed.RoyGBiv wrote: Tue Jul 03, 2018 1:34 pm Re: Kavanaugh...
He's a non-starter for me...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/32411/ru ... en-shapiroKavanaugh upheld Obamacare in Sissel v. Department of Health and Human Services as well as in Seven-Sky v. Holder, in which he stated that the Obamacare penalties were actually “taxes.”![]()
![]()
![]()
I was truly expecting it to be. They were both qualified and I think it would have made the arguments dems are now putting forth harder to make. Just my 2 cents but that and another 5 buxs still won't buy a cup of fancy coffee.SewTexas wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:27 pm I was sort of hoping for one of the two women, but I'm good with this guy
yeh, that was pretty much my thinking. But that's a big reason why he wouldn't do it, 'ya know?03Lightningrocks wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:32 pmI was truly expecting it to be. They were both qualified and I think it would have made the arguments dems are now putting forth harder to make. Just my 2 cents but that and another 5 buxs still won't buy a cup of fancy coffee.SewTexas wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:27 pm I was sort of hoping for one of the two women, but I'm good with this guy
He has many women ceo's working under him in his private life and has always been known to promote strong women in his company. This was another reason I thought the two women had a better than average shot.SewTexas wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:36 pmyeh, that was pretty much my thinking. But that's a big reason why he wouldn't do it, 'ya know?03Lightningrocks wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:32 pmI was truly expecting it to be. They were both qualified and I think it would have made the arguments dems are now putting forth harder to make. Just my 2 cents but that and another 5 buxs still won't buy a cup of fancy coffee.SewTexas wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:27 pm I was sort of hoping for one of the two women, but I'm good with this guy
I think his next nominee will be one the the two women. Maybe he saved them for the eventuality that the democrats and rino's managed to shut this guy down. Trump is a tricky kind of smart.03Lightningrocks wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:39 pmHe has many women ceo's working under him in his private life and has always been known to promote strong women in his company. This was another reason I thought the two women had a better than average shot.SewTexas wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:36 pmyeh, that was pretty much my thinking. But that's a big reason why he wouldn't do it, 'ya know?03Lightningrocks wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:32 pmI was truly expecting it to be. They were both qualified and I think it would have made the arguments dems are now putting forth harder to make. Just my 2 cents but that and another 5 buxs still won't buy a cup of fancy coffee.SewTexas wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:27 pm I was sort of hoping for one of the two women, but I'm good with this guy
Haha... that was what I was just saying.jason812 wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:41 pm Maybe Barrett will be nominated as Ginsburg's replacement. You know the left will demand a woman.
That maybe President Trump's plan.jason812 wrote: Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:41 pm Maybe Barrett will be nominated as Ginsburg's replacement. You know the left will demand a woman.