TexasCHLforum.com

Still in shock. Charlie Kirk was one of the kindest persons and genuinely sought dialogue with anyone in the hope to share his faith in Christ, but to also change peoples minds and have open and honest discussions about the various issues. He did not compromise his beliefs, yet did so with gentleness and firmness.

Below is picture of the weapon used from OpenSourceIntelligenceMonitor on X:

...The rifle, a Mauser .30–06 Bolt-Action Hunting Rifle, was found wrapped in a towel inside a wooded area near the building where the shot which killed Kirk originated from, with the spent cartridge still inside the rifle as well as three unspent rounds of .30–06 Springfield. All cartridges in the rifle were engraved with wording expressing transgender and antifascist ideologies, according to the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1966177917076906219

Vol Texan wrote: Thu Sep 11, 2025 11:46 am

puma guy wrote: Thu Sep 11, 2025 9:53 am I have a theory about this shooting. I think it was an orchestrated effort with many involved. The two people taken into custody and questioned were distractions to let the real shooter escape while law enforcement dealt with the first guy and the second guy dressed in black and running away was a backup decoy. I read they found the rifle, an old military surplus Mauser, converted to .30/06 caliber. It still had the spent shell used to kill Charlie in the chamber and two unspent cartridges in the magazine. All three were engraved with anti-fascist and transgender ideology phrases. Further shot was taken right after Charlie Kirk was asked a question about transgenders. Just as he was answering he was shot. I'll go out on a limb and say the police need to look into the person who asked the question for any correlation.

Your ideas sound a bit reaching - but for the life of me I can't argue with your reasoning. Everything you said is within the realm of possibility, given the evil perpetuated by the American left.

As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote as a quote for Sherlock Holmes, "eliminate the impossible and whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth".

I may be way off, but those thoughts came to my mind as not out of the realm of possibility. As stated it's a theory and only that. I acknowledge history is full of odd coincidences.

Reported by Wall Street Journal and others, but unconfirmed officially, that ammunition engraved with transgender and antifascist ideology inside the rifle.

Once they catch or find out who the assassin is, they can dig into his family, friends, associates, online activity, etc. and see if anyone helped. But without any evidence either way, I would likely attribute it to an evil person being radicalized believing that speech is equivalent to violence. Just seeing posts of numerous people celebrating this, makes me sick knowing our country is full of evil people that think this is OK. I have even seen videos of people saying they would have killed Charlie Kirk if they could. Seeing lots of posts that are wanting other conservatives assassinated.

But I agree with a post by Chris Loesch that this was done by an amateur and not a professional hit. In part he states:

The weapon: an older Mauser bolt-action rifle in .30-06 Springfield, fired from the Losee Center rooftop. Distance: 131–200 yards, per mapping and video evidence.

The .30-06 is an old, trusted, flat-shooting round. From a 22-inch barrel, a 165-grain bullet at 2,700 fps drops ~2.7 inches at 131 yards, ~4.3 inches at 200. Used in WW2 and Korea sniper rifles, it’s deadly accurate at these ranges.

Charlie was fatally hit in the neck. A sniper’s analysis backs up what I have been saying that the shooter aimed for the head but didn’t account for that drop. It’s a shot any novice hunter could make, but a pro adjusts for drop. This was an amateur with a dark motive not some super spy.


https://x.com/ChrisLoesch/status/1966273289447243967

https://x.com/SpencerGuard/status/1966161674546868329