Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 3:13 pm
by txinvestigator
quicksaveme wrote:I know what you mean. But, I am not 100% on all the details that the news gave out. According to the 911 call, it didn't sound like he was justified. Although I would like to think he should not be penalized, he did go outside where he was perfectly safe inside.
The law allows you to use deadly force to protect a third person's property.

I guess we could all stay perfectly safe inside and never leave.

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:34 pm
by stevie_d_64
txinvestigator wrote:
quicksaveme wrote:I know what you mean. But, I am not 100% on all the details that the news gave out. According to the 911 call, it didn't sound like he was justified. Although I would like to think he should not be penalized, he did go outside where he was perfectly safe inside.
The law allows you to use deadly force to protect a third person's property.

I guess we could all stay perfectly safe inside and never leave.
If we did that, how would the UAV's flying around outside monitor our activities then???

http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_F ... hp?t=11672

:lol: