TexasCHLforum.com

couzin wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote:

couzin wrote:While EOs can actually change the direction of a current Law or Statute that an agency follows - they are not supposed to do so unless Congress revisits the actual Law and modifies it in accordance with introduced legislation.

Yes, you are subject to executive orders when congress enacts legislation that includes language authorizing the president to amplify the scope of said legislation.

You do read all of the legislation passed by congress, don't you?

Anygunanywhere

Yep - I do - but you didn't read all of my text (emphasis mine above). BTW - here are the running totals of EOs by President:

GW Bush 268, so far
Clinton 363
G. Bush 165
Reagan 380
Carter 319
Ford 168
Nixon 345
Johnson 323
Kennedy 213
Eisenhower 481
Truman 893
FD Roosevelt 3,466

You are correct, sir. I must remember to read entire posts.

My apology.



People idolize FDR.

Sheesh!

Anygunanywhere

No apology needed. This whole thing just has me seeing red. I may be knee jerk reacting, but I really feel like we - the law-abiding, gun owning, hunting, target shooting, self-defense, private citizens - are really about to be royally scr....d!!

The government of the U.S. is about to fall into the hands of the majority inhabiting the effete East and West coasts and the now economically defunct Northern and Midwestern post-industrial states.

The question arises, once again, does the general populace south of the Mason-Dixon Line want to be a part of it?

Watch it!

Yeah!!!
Lumping everything north and sound is silly North Dakata Utah and Montana make us look like leftist , while
Virginia and Florida can't seem to decide if they are Red or Blue..

Effette !!!! Grrrrrr.

Um....

That's not what I was referring to.