Deadly Force even if Attacker is in Retreat

Discussion of other state's CHL's & reciprocity

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13577
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Deadly Force even if Attacker is in Retreat

Post by C-dub »

Sorry. lol
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13577
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Deadly Force even if Attacker is in Retreat

Post by C-dub »

boomerang wrote:I knew someone would say that. Fine. Get a partial refund. "rlol"

Chapter 9 allows for deadly force to "protect or recover" the property, not to stop the criminal from escaping. You can see it doesn't allow deadly force to stop a fleeing murderer or rapist.
It took me a bit, but what about this?

Sec. 9.03. CONFINEMENT AS JUSTIFIABLE FORCE. Confinement is justified when force is justified by this chapter if the actor takes reasonable measures to terminate the confinement as soon as he knows he safely can unless the person confined has been arrested for an offense.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
Bart
Senior Member
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:23 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart
Contact:

Re: Deadly Force even if Attacker is in Retreat

Post by Bart »

C-dub wrote:It took me a bit, but what about this?

Sec. 9.03. CONFINEMENT AS JUSTIFIABLE FORCE. Confinement is justified when force is justified by this chapter if the actor takes reasonable measures to terminate the confinement as soon as he knows he safely can unless the person confined has been arrested for an offense.
What about it?
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13577
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Deadly Force even if Attacker is in Retreat

Post by C-dub »

Bart wrote:
C-dub wrote:It took me a bit, but what about this?

Sec. 9.03. CONFINEMENT AS JUSTIFIABLE FORCE. Confinement is justified when force is justified by this chapter if the actor takes reasonable measures to terminate the confinement as soon as he knows he safely can unless the person confined has been arrested for an offense.
What about it?
It is in reply to the position that we could not prevent a murderer or rapist from fleeing. I'm not sure if this gives us a defense to doing so or not. That's what my question is asking?
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
Bart
Senior Member
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:23 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart
Contact:

Re: Deadly Force even if Attacker is in Retreat

Post by Bart »

It says confinement is justified when force is justified so that's not deadly force, but anyway where does it say force is justified to stop a murderer from running away?
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13577
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Deadly Force even if Attacker is in Retreat

Post by C-dub »

I'm wondering if the part where it says confinement is justified when force is justified. Force would have been justified in preventing the murder or rape, so I'm wondering if it would be justified in preventing the perpetrator from fleeing if you witnessed the act or came upon him just after completion of the act.

I'll admit that it might be a stretch.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
boomerang
Senior Member
Posts: 2629
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Deadly Force even if Attacker is in Retreat

Post by boomerang »

Back to my previous comment, I think students should ask for a refund if the instructor isn't teaching the law.
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"
Catfight
Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:56 pm

Re: Deadly Force even if Attacker is in Retreat

Post by Catfight »

TheArmedFarmer wrote:
he had spent two years awaiting trial on a first-degree murder charge.
Maybe there's a detail I'm missing here, but I wonder what happened to this man's right to a "speedy" trial?
They dont just sit in jail...most of the time is spent fighting by attorneys. Ive seen people at our jail go longer than that, but its their own fault as they try to find a legal loophole to exploit.
Texas CHL Instructor
NRA Certified Instructor - Pistol, Rifle, and HFS
TCLEOSE Certified Police Instructor
NRA Member
Post Reply

Return to “Other States”