Perhaps the bank's attempt at keeping the moron from reproducing?seamusTX wrote:You're welcome.
BTW, if you search the web for "exploding dye pack," you can see how many robbers stuff the loot down their pants and suffer injuries to their manhood. I don't seem them suing, either. Most states prohibit lawsuits for injuries suffered during the commission of a felony.
Sheesh. Bring a bag for the loot.![]()
- Jim
Houston man kills teen burglary suspect
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
- sjfcontrol
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6267
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
- Location: Flint, TX
Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget.
Never Forget.

Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect
Contrary to popular belief, you don't have to die to win the Darwin Award, just remove your genes from the pool. If an exploding dye pack does the job, you should be automatically nominated. 
- Scott in Houston
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:19 am
- Location: Houston
Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect
I'd be concerned about at least a civil suit based on this statement the home owner made in that article:
“I didn't want him to die,” he said. “I didn't want him to get away, but I didn't want to kill him either.”
Doesn't that leave many possibilities to the hands of scumbag attorneys? Anyway, the world has one less thief in it, but the civil options seem to be a possible issue here. Unless there is immunity to suit in this scenario that I'm not aware of.
“I didn't want him to die,” he said. “I didn't want him to get away, but I didn't want to kill him either.”
Doesn't that leave many possibilities to the hands of scumbag attorneys? Anyway, the world has one less thief in it, but the civil options seem to be a possible issue here. Unless there is immunity to suit in this scenario that I'm not aware of.
Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect
The Castle Doctrine helps protect the homeowner from lawsuits in the event of a justified shooting. While a lawyer could still file suit, they would be dumb in doing so as they know they would lose. So, any lawyer worth his salt will not take one of these cases.G192627 wrote:I'd be concerned about at least a civil suit based on this statement the home owner made in that article:
“I didn't want him to die,” he said. “I didn't want him to get away, but I didn't want to kill him either.”
Doesn't that leave many possibilities to the hands of scumbag attorneys? Anyway, the world has one less thief in it, but the civil options seem to be a possible issue here. Unless there is immunity to suit in this scenario that I'm not aware of.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect
Civil Practice and Remedies Code 83.001, immunity from liability for justifiable use of deadly force.
- Jim
- Jim
- Scott in Houston
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:19 am
- Location: Houston
Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect
Good to know! That is my 2nd biggest fear with regards to having to use force to protect myself.
Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect
Even if the criminal or his family don't have any money, I think you can ask the judge to make their attorney pay your attorney's costs, for being party to the frivolous lawsuit.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.