Re: ORAL!!
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:21 am
No.WildBill wrote:If they are liable, they would be liable whether you had a CHL or not. If you had a CHL and did not carry would they be liable?Dragonfighter wrote:I realize this is treacherous ground I'm on, and I have struggled with this, but I am really starting to lean toward the POV that if you allow public access, you should not be able to restrict access by lawfully armed persons without some sort of express liability. IOW if anything happens to me, my family or for that matter anyone I may have been able to protect...you're liable.