Page 2 of 2
Re: Milk jug ammo testing LONG DETAILED POST with pics
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:05 pm
by mctowalot
IMHO, every company should now be required to post the "smush factor" of their product on the box. Thanks for all of your hard work A.R.!
I'd really like to get some Corbon PowerBall .380 in your hands for the next test (I've been wondering about their smush factor for some time :)
Re: Milk jug ammo testing LONG DETAILED POST with pics
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:00 pm
by Mastodon
mctowalot wrote:IMHO, every company should now be required to post the "smush factor" of their product on the box. Thanks for all of your hard work A.R.!
I'd really like to get some Corbon PowerBall .380 in your hands for the next test (I've been wondering about their smush factor for some time :)
And every milk jug should be required to post caliber minimum.
Thanks again. I immediately found data applicable for me. Looking forward to the 38 sp j-frame data in the future.
Re: Milk jug ammo testing LONG DETAILED POST with pics
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:40 pm
by A-R
I might get out sometime this week to do the .38 Special. Gotta see how the week goes. Sick kids are throwing a monkey into the wrench quite regularly these days.
Re: Milk jug ammo testing LONG DETAILED POST with pics
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:44 am
by 03Lightningrocks
Wow!!! Impressive work. Thanks for sharing. The performance of the .380 rounds give me concerns.

Re: Milk jug ammo testing LONG DETAILED POST with pics
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:47 am
by jlangton
I'm very impressed by and comforted by the performance of the Win USA40 JHP's that are in my daily carry. Just tells me that this commonly available ammo that's reasonably priced will do the job if called upon.
JL
Re: Milk jug ammo testing LONG DETAILED POST with pics
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:13 pm
by A-R
OK, finally got around to positng some of the excess ammo for sale here
http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=32870" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;